Hahaha he thought he was gone get some and he got caught!!
Talk about taking one for the team she went on at least 3 dates with him...
Stand by for the INCEL lashing out.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
To enter, all you need to do is add an image of yourself at the range below!
Join the contestHahaha he thought he was gone get some and he got caught!!
Talk about taking one for the team she went on at least 3 dates with him...
Imagine that. 30% more currency in circulation than a year ago. How could there be inflation?![]()
True to a large degree, or at least it should be, but more likely is that oil prices are rising in anticipation of supply issues given the atrocious policies of the new government, and so far that is the biggest driver of inflation across the board. Pent up. demand is also going to be an issue, of course, especially y/y given the almost zero demand for travel twelve months ago. But once again, in the last twenty years it doesn't seem like the velocity of money has really changed much, yet the supply has increased immensely, and we don't yet see the corresponding inflation we should, so reducing it to a single factor this month seems unwise.Those that took Econ 101 will remember that the velocity of money is also a factor. If the Fed adds 30% to the currency "in circulation" (a bit of an ambiguous term) but velocity decreases by more than 30% because, oh, people are forced to stay home and stream Netflix shows, then one will actually experience deflation.
The real fun happens later when all that pent-up demand pops loose, or when supplies dwindle for certain items and effectively a market turns into a bidding war, or when the concept of rational market behavior is proven incorrect and dislocations occur. We're probably experiencing all of those things currently, and it's probably going to get worse as emotional people continue to react to situations they do not want to deal with but cannot ignore.
True to a large degree, or at least it should be, but more likely is that oil prices are rising in anticipation of supply issues given the atrocious policies of the new government, and so far that is the biggest driver of inflation across the board. Pent up. demand is also going to be an issue, of course, especially y/y given the almost zero demand for travel twelve months ago. But once again, in the last twenty years it doesn't seem like the velocity of money has really changed much, yet the supply has increased immensely, and we don't yet see the corresponding inflation we should, so reducing it to a single factor this month seems unwise.
So yes, you are right. But the fed number for the velocity of money is GDP/M2, so it just finishes the equation V=PT/M where PT=GDP. So it isn't something measured independently. I was certainly sloppy with my words there. What I was referring to was that it doesn't appear that other things that determine what we perceive as the velocity of money, like savings rate etc, aggregate demand, etc have changed much over time, which is the conundrum I consistently allude to.I'm going to challenge your statement that "in the last twenty years it doesn't seem like the velocity of money has really changed much":
View attachment 7604195
Looks to me like it's dropped substantially over that timeframe. The drop just in the past year alone was huge. That's why adding 30% to the money supply in the past year/month/day/nanosecond doesn't spark inflation.
What's the number I heard in the radio last week - something like 60% of all stimulus money got parked in savings accounts? I don't know if I'm recalling this correctly (or if it was properly stated), but it plays into this overall theme that has hampered recovery since 2009 - those who are net savers aren't spending money, and those who are in debt cannot afford to add any more debt. There are obvious exceptions to this in the current market - plenty of money is being spent on houses and pickup trucks - but overall, that represents relatively few participants in the economy. Kinda tough to juice up the economy when less than 10% of the population can afford to engage in commerce beyond the bare necessities.
And with that, we've way overshot the boundaries of expected discourse in this thread![]()
but pizzagate is a conspiracy theory, so just ignore it.
I know a liberal, he said he voted for Trump when I was pointing out what a psychopathic liar Hillary was in 2016, but he keeps his TV remote J&B Welded to CNN 14 hours a day.classic
![]()
Max 3 shells, legal time stops 30 min after sunset and driving to a foot locker parking lot would be hunting over bait.I know a liberal, he said he voted for Trump when I was pointing out what a psychopathic liar Hillary was in 2016, but he keeps his TV remote J&B Welded to CNN 14 hours a day.
Since he's Jewish I once tried talking him into buying an AR15, claiming he of all people should appreciate the 2nd A. He not only declined but he also later blamed Sandy Hook in general and me and others in particular as black rifle owners for the incident.
This summer, when Antifa was burning down cities and were even rioting in nearby Austin, he called and asked me if removing the plug from his pump dove gun was legal as he said he felt defenseless.
So yes, you are right. But the fed number for the velocity of money is GDP/M2, so it just finishes the equation V=PT/M where PT=GDP. So it isn't something measured independently. I was certainly sloppy with my words there. What I was referring to was that it doesn't appear that other things that determine what we perceive as the velocity of money, like savings rate etc, aggregate demand, etc have changed much over time, which is the conundrum I consistently allude to.
You may be right about who, and how many can afford, but I'd argue otherwise, to wit there has been a great flattening of the sense of "luxury goods" over that period. Whereas in, say the '50s, there was a huge disconnect between what the elite had, air travel, television, opera, and what the common man had, radio, baseball, at this point we all have iphones, flat screens and garbage sports, while the differences come in the ability to amass capital, not how to enjoy it.
I think that both of these things, how the fundamental above equation holds up, and how the flattening or steepening of the "luxury curve" changes are going to be interesting, and going to determine what of what we knew was right, and what was wrong.
I should have told him his 3 shell max was plenty if he followed his candidate Biden's advise and just stepped out on the porch and shot of couple blasts in the air.Max 3 shells, legal time stops 30 min after sunset and driving to a foot locker parking lot would be hunting over bait.
She's got that 1000 cock stare.
Right, so what we are saying is that the propensity to spend has gone from 96.5% down to 93%, roughly, over that time period. When viewed from that angle, the change is much less significant, and it is the spending side that we would expect to look like the velocity of money, at least intuitively, to some degree. Meanwhile, M2 has gone from roughly 7 to 20, or almost tripling. All I am saying is that inflation, either measurable or perceived, doesn't really look like that scenario describes.Savings rate is another interesting stat to explore:
View attachment 7604245
Oh, crap, that's a complete mess with the spike at the start of the pandemic. Let's remove that so we can better see the trend in "normal" times:
View attachment 7604248
Ah, that's better. It's a noisy data set, but it's pretty easy to see that the trend went from something in the 3.5% range pre-2008 recession to roughly double that afterwards. Is that significant? Hard to say - but it probably has a substantial deflationary influence that's going to counteract some of the money that's being "printed".
Things like auto sales are interesting - we go from selling ~15 million vehicles/year in the 1970s to ~17 million today, despite the population being roughly 50% higher today than 45 years ago. Now, we've got different demographics and vehicles last longer and a whole bunch of other relevant differences, so it's not a "neat" comparison and I wouldn't use just this one set of stats as the basis for a claim that automobiles are less affordable. But it certainly hints at a narrowing of the car market.
Anyways, the whole point is that it's not sufficient to look at a simple stat like M2 supply going up by X% in Y time and start doing the chicken-little inflation dance. But it's also not a bad idea to play some what-ifs and wonder what happens if all that fresh money supply gets combined with a 2007-level of savings (or lack thereof) or late-1990s levels of money velocity. Could get messy!
Question is, are you willing to find the answer, or stick it out to fix what you can?Who is John Galt?