-
Having trouble using the site?
Contact support
PortaJohn
- Thread starter Lowlight
- Start date
-
- Tags
It's probably futile to ask what the manufacturers are going to invent to reverse the gene mutation. After all, there's no motivation for them to correct or reverse anything because they cannot be sued.
This is kind of thinking is why drugs should remain illegal.
That's great news for people with student loan debt! Let's spread the news for those that want the student loan debt erased. Move to the Ukraine! Shout out to all those psych majors living in the mother's basement!
Completely wrong, there is substantially less energy in prairie grass than corn, ie you can’t make chicken dumplings out of chicken shit.
All things considered (crackdown on the truckers protest and what not yet now calling for lethal aid and more to Ukraine ) … I doubt I ever seen’t a more ironic last name, bordering on fuckin sarcastic..
www.thegatewaypundit.com
EXCLUSIVE: Canada's Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland's Grandfather Was a Nazi and She Admires George Soros. It's No Surprise She's Labeling Freedom-Loving Canadians Terrorists | The Gateway Pundit | by Joe Hoft
On Monday Canada’s Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Finance, Chrystia Freeland, announced crowdfunding for Canadian freedom protesters and truck drivers will be considered ‘terrorist financing.’ This comes as no surprise since her grandfather was a highly connected Nazi and she’s close to...
www.thegatewaypundit.com
doesn't appear that way, "prairie biomass would yield 51 percent more energy per acre than ethanol from corn grown on fertile land"
Mixed Prairie Grasses Better Source of Biofuel Than Corn Ethanol and Soybean Biodiesel
Fuels made from prairie biomass reduce carbon dioxide levels in atmosphere
www.nsf.gov
Prairie grass or switchgrass yields more than 540 percent more energy than the energy needed to produce and convert it to ethanol, making the grassy weed a far superior source for biofuels than corn ethanol, reports a study published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS).
Well not only did House pass it, but Senate RINOS (McConnell) are jumping on board and praising it. Anyone who votes "no" will be criticized as being "anti-Ukranian support".
Couple of problems.doesn't appear that way, "prairie biomass would yield 51 percent more energy per acre than ethanol from corn grown on fertile land"
Mixed Prairie Grasses Better Source of Biofuel Than Corn Ethanol and Soybean Biodiesel
Fuels made from prairie biomass reduce carbon dioxide levels in atmosphere
Prairie grass or switchgrass yields more than 540 percent more energy than the energy needed to produce and convert it to ethanol, making the grassy weed a far superior source for biofuels than corn ethanol, reports a study published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS).
1 one must take other crops out of rotation to plant switchgrass.
2 what other use/market of switchgrass is there?
3 in truth we don't need ethanol when we are sitting on a couple of oceans of oil.
The last one was proven with the last President.
I can imagine where the prices would have been if he was still there.
R
because they don't take muslim migrants and don't push lgbt to kids.
Need to hope and pray that Manchin and Sinema vote against it in the senate without any of the Rino’s going for it… My fear is that they’ll all virtue signal Ukraine Ukraine Ukraine, we need to provide the aid to them, oh, and we’re giving more money to the department of defense as well… Sure hope they grow some balls and reject it
From the same people that tell you C02 is a
They have been talking about for 10 years and can’t get a plant built due to the simple fact that cellulose digesters work better in thedoesn't appear that way, "prairie biomass would yield 51 percent more energy per acre than ethanol from corn grown on fertile land"
Mixed Prairie Grasses Better Source of Biofuel Than Corn Ethanol and Soybean Biodiesel
Fuels made from prairie biomass reduce carbon dioxide levels in atmosphere
Prairie grass or switchgrass yields more than 540 percent more energy than the energy needed to produce and convert it to ethanol, making the grassy weed a far superior source for biofuels than corn ethanol, reports a study published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS).
Fascinating, you pull up an article that from 2006 on this great idea of using biomass grass in theory. Why has no one done it yet? Are those of us in ag too stupid to find more profitable crops? This bullshit has been floating around forever by the same idiots who think that carbon is a pollutant.doesn't appear that way, "prairie biomass would yield 51 percent more energy per acre than ethanol from corn grown on fertile land"
Mixed Prairie Grasses Better Source of Biofuel Than Corn Ethanol and Soybean Biodiesel
Fuels made from prairie biomass reduce carbon dioxide levels in atmosphere
Prairie grass or switchgrass yields more than 540 percent more energy than the energy needed to produce and convert it to ethanol, making the grassy weed a far superior source for biofuels than corn ethanol, reports a study published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS).
BREAKING NEWS: Hunter Biden Firm Rosemont Seneca Invested In A Company Linked To Ukraine Biological Labs - The True Defender !
Biden’s company Rosemont Seneca provided capital for the companies behind the creation of Biolabs in Ukraine. We have heard from the US State Department that there were US-funded Biolabs in Ukraine. Later, on Wednesday, Jen Psaki stated that there weren’t US-funded Biolabs in Ukraine. Join The...
thetruedefender.com
Switch Grass (and a variety or other widely touted options) didn't take off for many reasons. (and is the comparison against the corn grain the stover or both?) Corn stover is a arguably a much more realistic if not not cost effective option.
The Dept of Energy was pouring money into any company with a good Biofuels story and most were just that.
This was especially the case around 15 years ago.
The cellulosic biofuels require C5 converting yeasts and enzymes (unlike corn based ethanol) as well as some form of pretreatment, which was arguably one of the biggest challenges.
Only a handful of companies had/have C5 converting ethanologens.
The fermentation technology does exist but the ethanol produced is not cost effective.
70% of US corn goes to animal feed. The food vs fuel claim was and is total bullshit.
Food grade corn is generally grown on contracts and not impacted. The #2 yellow dent corn that is most prevalent across the Midwest can be utilized for ethanol with the the protein still recovered for animal feed as dried distillers grains.
I believe most of the ICM built plants were 2.8+ gallons per bushel of corn.
Ethanol utilizes the starch not the protein so we aren't losing the feed value of the grain.
Grain (Corn) production/handling/logistics is very efficient and understood unlike biomass.
How do you handle and store cellulosic biomass? Baling required additional field passes and huge space requirements for storage.
Can you dry the grass or stover and bale it when fighting rain and snow and muddy fields?
Ever seen mass bale storage sites go up in flames from spontaneous combustion?
What if you your cropping and tillage plans require "X" amount of residue based on your soil type and slope? Can you be in compliance and still harvest the biomass?
I would love for cellulosic ethanol to be commercially viable and I would also like conventional starch based ethanol to be more efficient.
Unfortunately, reality often limits our aspirations!
not fascinating at all given that was the time much of this was being discussed. As we know, politics played a big role in this. Point still stands, it's a better source than corn which is what the primary point was to the video posted
Either way, it was the big start to the green bs we have today. I'm an oil guy, drill it till it's empty as that will aid our country best.
Bear with me here:
www.foxnews.com
Regardless of whether we do or don't have these labs, and whether or not they are weapons oriented or cleanup from USSR - matters not. What does matter is "the press" is no longer believable - at anything. Anything the press says...put a logical "NOT" bar across the top and you'll be just as likely to have the real story. THIS is the travesty of the liberal press...they destroyed themselves (that part I have no problem with), but they really destroyed journalism and the "free press" as envisioned by Benjamin Franklin, et al.
The free press was supposed to keep the government honest...until the government obviously figured out they could make them a propaganda machine on steriods. Admittedly, the press has always had a bent one way or another; but, now...it's just pure propaganda for marxism.
US vows to halt gaslighting after Russia asks UN Security Council for special meeting on ‘biolabs' in Ukraine
Russia and China are doubling down on claims that the United States is conducting biological weapons research in “biolabs” across war-torn Ukraine – assertions that leaders in Washington and Kyiv have called absurd.
www.foxnews.com
Regardless of whether we do or don't have these labs, and whether or not they are weapons oriented or cleanup from USSR - matters not. What does matter is "the press" is no longer believable - at anything. Anything the press says...put a logical "NOT" bar across the top and you'll be just as likely to have the real story. THIS is the travesty of the liberal press...they destroyed themselves (that part I have no problem with), but they really destroyed journalism and the "free press" as envisioned by Benjamin Franklin, et al.
The free press was supposed to keep the government honest...until the government obviously figured out they could make them a propaganda machine on steriods. Admittedly, the press has always had a bent one way or another; but, now...it's just pure propaganda for marxism.
So, a crack-addicted pedophile linked to a bioweapon lab. What could possibly go wrong?BREAKING NEWS: Hunter Biden Firm Rosemont Seneca Invested In A Company Linked To Ukraine Biological Labs - The True Defender !
Biden’s company Rosemont Seneca provided capital for the companies behind the creation of Biolabs in Ukraine. We have heard from the US State Department that there were US-funded Biolabs in Ukraine. Later, on Wednesday, Jen Psaki stated that there weren’t US-funded Biolabs in Ukraine. Join The...
Last edited:
I’d call him a liar but he’s just a stupid twit that just repeats whatever Obama tells him to say. But he fucks that up too!
Last edited:
yeah, i guess forgot about calling the existence of biolabs in ukraine a conspiracy theory, just 7 or 8 days ago.Bear with me here:
US vows to halt gaslighting after Russia asks UN Security Council for special meeting on ‘biolabs' in Ukraine
Russia and China are doubling down on claims that the United States is conducting biological weapons research in “biolabs” across war-torn Ukraine – assertions that leaders in Washington and Kyiv have called absurd.
Regardless of whether we do or don't have these labs, and whether or not they are weapons oriented or cleanup from USSR - matters not. What does matter is "the press" is no longer believable - at anything. Anything the press says...put a logical "NOT" bar across the top and you'll be just as likely to have the real story. THIS is the travesty of the liberal press...they destroyed themselves (that part I have no problem with), but they really destroyed journalism and the "free press" as envisioned by Benjamin Franklin, et al.
The free press was supposed to keep the government honest...until the government obviously figured out they could make them a propaganda machine on steriods. Admittedly, the press has always had a bent one way or another; but, now...it's just pure propaganda for marxism.
