• Win a RIX Storm S3 Thermal Imaging Scope!

    To enter, all you need to do is add an image of yourself at the range below!

    Join the contest

PortaJohn

pgqvj3imPZjE.jpeg
 
 
  • Like
Reactions: gigamortis
WTF

 
  • Angry
Reactions: gigamortis
I don't know what to think of Ben lately. I used to really enjoy the daily show he does on YouTube. However, over the last year or two, I haven't been as religious about keeping up with it.

He seems to be taking a more MSM approach with what he reports on and is willing to say that is controversial. Uses a lot of polls and information sources that many would find questionable. He doesn't seem to be willing to talk about adverse reactions/deaths. I don't think he has ever taken voter fraud seriously. Usually says it was more of policy changes that got more people to vote and lopsided media coverage. (Which is also true) But he never really suggests any nefarious acts. He talked about 2000 Mules today. Summed up, he said the that the procedures used may have been illegal, but it does not make the votes fraudulent, but its suspicous. He questioned why didnt 2000 mules not track down the mules, catch them on video multiple drop boxes or release the information on the non profits paying the mules. All information I'd like to know too...

It's a very dry lawyer-like approach to topics that doesn't seem to take into account the greater picture of information and events. I get that its just part of growing a large business using the heavily censored online platforms with the most market share. I can imagine they are very careful about what they say and how they say it. Just makes me less interested in his content.