The only bullet I've used in 6.5 is the 120 Nosler ballistic tip in my 6.5 wsm, I'm not pushing it to the max, I'm only pushing it to 3160 fps. I've shot 3 Michigan whitetails that all were drt. Ranges were 165 to 370 yards.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
To enter, all you need to do is add an image of yourself at the range below! Subscribers get more entries, check out the plans below for a better chance of winning!
Join the contest SubscribeI want to try the Barnes LRX 127gr but since my gun loves heavy stuff I would imagine the accuracy will be less than the loads above. Won't know till I try it!
Does anyone have experience with the Berger 130 hybrid on deer? I have been shooting them all summer in my 6.5x47.
In my 6.5 SAUM, I have had good success with both 127 LRX (2 moose and a handful of caribou) and 139 Scenar's ( 1 moose and a few caribou). I have not had anything walk away.
Panhandle Precision has a write up and video of hunts using them on antelope and deer. http://panhandleprecision.com/berger-6-5-mm-130-grain-ar-hybrid/Does anyone have experience with the Berger 130 hybrid on deer? I have been shooting them all summer in my 6.5x47.
I sure wouldn't write the LRX off until you try it, it has been a very accurate bullet in my rifle. Also, as you can see in the pic below, it's not really much (if any) shorter than the heavier jacketed bullets.
View attachment 6953682
L - R: 127gr LRX, 130gr NAB, 140gr NAB, 140gr NCC, 143gr ELDx.
I like bonded bullets for elk and crossover antelope to elk hunting. Nos Accubonds haven't let me down terminal performance wise, and they are aerodynamically slick enough for my purposes. I used a 140gr NAB on a cow elk last year, through the lungs, nicked the scapula and out the other side, 20 yds later it was down.
I finally got to try the 127gr LRX on an Antelope today, nice performance, of course I intentionally put it through bone, so that's to be expected with a mono. Still, I was pleased with the performance, I might try it out on a cow this year if I can't get a bull.... On the other hand, I'm not sure I want to mess with success, the Accubond already gives me everything I want in a hunting bullet.
I'm surprised to hear these bad reports on the 143gr ELDx, most folks I've talked to around here that have put them into deer sized game seem to have good things to say.
We run 143 ELDX in 260’s and 6.5’s. The 260 shoots a bit faster with good results. The 6.5 CM I have mixed feeling about right now. May need to crank the speeds up.
What are the 143 ELDX users running for speed. These are running about 2700 FPS. But on the slow side I’m thinking
Winchester Expedition 142 Nosler Long Range AccuBonds 6.5 Creedmoor, extremely accurate out of my Savage 11 Long Range Hunter, measured velocity 2727 fps average at 6600 feet. I have killed Elk and Pronghorn with the std AccuBond (7mm 140gr.) believe the Winchester load should do the job very well.
Just curious if you've used them on coyotes or similar.The 139gr Scenar is one of the best big game bullets you'll ever use.
That ain't a guess...….
I have used them on Caribou, DRT...I will hopefully have some results on pronghorn from the Berger 130 OTM to post up here in a couple weeks. My daughter will be shooting them in her 22" 6.5SLR @ 2888fps. I know they sure are accurate.
I had great results 200 eld x 30cal 787 yard shot threw shoulder broke it opened up and went on back side of far shoulder found in hide dis amazing. But I did forget I had some bad results with 7mm 150 eld x not doing great at all close rangeI too will be switching from the 147 eld-x. Sure they killed the whitetail, but most anything will with a good shot. It’s placement that matters. However. Some bullets are better at killing than others. I harvested two whitetail where the round entered between a rib and exited between a rib without hitting a bone, I’m fairly certain that both of those rounds didn’t expand at all. Again, yes it killed them, but there are better ways to go about it. From my experience, I can’t whole heartedly recommend the eld-x as a hunting round.
I too will be switching from the 147 eld-x. Sure they killed the whitetail, but most anything will with a good shot. It’s placement that matters. However. Some bullets are better at killing than others. I harvested two whitetail where the round entered between a rib and exited between a rib without hitting a bone, I’m fairly certain that both of those rounds didn’t expand at all. Again, yes it killed them, but there are better ways to go about it. From my experience, I can’t whole heartedly recommend the eld-x as a hunting round.
Yeah, my fault! Edited the original message, good catch. I was using the Precision Hunter 143 eld-x factory ammo.Did you mean 143 ELD-X or 147 ELD-M? Many have claimed to get mixed or bad results with 143 ELD-X but the ELD-Ms so far seem to be have a good track record with very few if any negative claimed results on terminal performance...
They don’t exit on a moose forward to rear but broadside they will.127 LRX. Havent recovered one yet from any elk or deer the old lady has shot. Shots have been from 60 to 400yds. No splinters or lead spattered meat to throw away.
edited to add: its a .260 rem