Not by blood, but by beliefs.....here I am.
I nominate myself as chief of the right wing death squads.
Can I run the helicopter wing? I’ll rename it Pinochet airlines!
I also can pay tribute to you, my commandant, in…. ears.
Sirhr
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not by blood, but by beliefs.....here I am.
I nominate myself as chief of the right wing death squads.
Nah, let Herrera gut the agency. His first job should be setting up a big bonfire for all the records that they supposedly don't have... And imprisonment/execution for all the wormy fucks who compiled it.
Then use ATF agents to kick the doors of anti-gun politicians in states that violate the 2A.
Mike
Noses are better if we are going on the Pinochet theme. It's close to Pinocchio.Can I run the helicopter wing? I’ll rename it Pinochet airlines!
I also can pay tribute to you, my commandant, in…. ears.
Sirhr
Noses are better if we are going on the Pinochet theme. It's close to Pinocchio.
Some food for thought on the Tulsi nomination below.....
I’m sorry folks, we are going to have to wait to understand the thinking behind this one. I have absolutely no idea. Mrs Gabbard has never led any organization of scale, nor held any position of intelligence review that I am aware of.
Other than being a campaign surrogate (via RFK Jr) and very close friend of Tucker Carlson, who I’m told is one of a small group organizing the cabinet appointments; together with Donald Trump Jr, Vivek Ramaswamy, Elon Musk and Robert F Kennedy Jr. (currently living in Mar-a-Lago); I’m not sure what would be the plan for Tulsi Gabbard (maybe with guidance from Ric Grenell?). Like everyone else, I’m puzzled.
I read every sentence of that announcement carefully. I don’t see mention of a skillset attributable to IC organization or large institutional leadership. However, maybe it is Tulsi Gabbard’s inherent sense toward protecting constitutional freedom that is of great value. Gabbard does express a solid strain of Rand Paul type libertarianism.
I am aware that everyone associated with the intelligence position decision-making on the transition team believes the Intelligence Community (IC) is a worthy, important and valuable construct, unfortunately led by corrupt individuals. Newly appointed National Security Advisor Mike Waltz is one of many who hold this opinion.
President Trump Announces Nomination of Tulsi Gabbard to Director of National IntelligenceThe transition team earnestly believe the honorable IC ‘rank and file’ paradigm; a type of thinking/wish-casting that I dropped many years ago. As a consequence, perhaps they believe that changing the faceplates will stop the silo engineers from using the weapons within it. Frankly, I’m just not sure.
Le otorgo su deseo.Can I run the helicopter wing? I’ll rename it Pinochet airlines!
I also can pay tribute to you, my commandant, in…. ears.
Sirhr
She's not the only one with no exprience running a huge department with no experience making budgets, etc, etc. These will either be homeruns or they're going to be absolute failure. I don't think there is any inbetween. Of course, if one cannot make a good decision based on getting fed th proper information; it doesn't matter if they have experience or not.Some food for thought on the Tulsi nomination below.....
President Trump Announces Nomination of Tulsi Gabbard to Director of National Intelligence
This is what I hope happensI'd go with Tulsi in a heartbeat. I trust her much more than 90% in the GOP.
She knows some don't trust her and I think she's out to prove them wrong.
UH-60s aren't big enough.Just get me a fleet of Blackhawks and some pipe hitters to help load them and I will have your swamp clean as a whistle faster than you can say “flying lesson, Mr. Secretary??”
And your streets cleaner than if Ned Flanders were in charge!!!
And noses it is!!
Sirhr
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...-rubio-seats-vacated-trump-cabinet-positions/Two people close to DeSantis told Politico that he would likely look to Florida Lt. Gov. Jeanette Nunez, Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody, former Florida House Speaker Jose Oliva, or DeSantis’s chief of staff James Uthmeier as possible replacements.
DeSantis hasn’t indicated who he might select as an interim senator. He could appoint himself, as there have been mumblings that he would be interested in running in 2028 anyway. His term as governor ends in 2026, and he is term-limited.
There is one scenario in which DeSantis could work with Nunez to resign as governor, which would allow her to ascend to becoming governor and appoint him directly to the Senate seat, which would bypass DeSantis’s need to wait to run.
I think his mandate is going to be to build back the human component.So, back to Pete H as SecDef. I'm still really curious about this one. Absolutely NOBODY I know dislikes this man and his service to Our Republic. However, many I've spoken with agree that there is a LOT more to being SecDef. Many said Kash Patel should have been it. Universally people I've spoken to seem to think that it takes a combination scientist and businessman to be in SecDef position. Lot's of financials and understanding of technology and where it's going.
I seriously hope he can rise to that as I do not know if he's got anything in his background to pull from with budgets, line items, and pretty hard core understanding of the tech involved in building something like the new B-21. I wish nothing but the best for Pete though, as he's been in DJT's camp since he won in 2016 and I don't see him backstabbing Trump the way Mattis did. Perhaps, at this time it's more important to have that trust than some super brain!!!
One thing is for sure, he'll be infinitely better than the guy in there now.
Than fire Rubio from State and appoint someone good.Don't be surprised if Ron DeSantis resigns as governor and ends up being appointed to fill Rubio's seat.
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...-rubio-seats-vacated-trump-cabinet-positions/
Rubio's innate hatred of communism is more than enough.Than fire Rubio from State and appoint someone good.
Some food for thought on the Tulsi nomination below.....
President Trump Announces Nomination of Tulsi Gabbard to Director of National Intelligence
He seems a little too Neocon for me.Rubio's innate hatred of communism is more than enough.
It's a fire that burns hot in a way few Americans can understand.
She's not the only one with no exprience running a huge department with no experience making budgets, etc, etc. These will either be homeruns or they're going to be absolute failure. I don't think there is any inbetween. Of course, if one cannot make a good decision based on getting fed th proper information; it doesn't matter if they have experience or not.
The Secretary of State is our foreign secretary/minister. As such internal affairs aren't his concern.Problem about certain communist haters they only see them outside our borders when the real threat is actually inside our boborders.
Radcliffe was DNI during the election steal in 2020.One thing I will say is between Kash, Tulsi, and J. Ratcliffe, the deep state is going to be on the defense. What that means, who knows; but none of those three are cool with what's been going on with regards to Constitutional violations, weaponization against citizens, etc.
I get that but Rubio would be too “adventuresome outside our borders and probably get giddy at being fawned over by other heads of state.The Secretary of State is our foreign secretary/minister. As such internal affairs aren't his concern.
The Secretaries of Justice and Homeland Security have what you want.
I too am skeptical of her. She CLAIMS she saw the light on 2A....but did she really? I highly doubt it; but, maybe I'm wrong.I haven’t forgot it was only a short time ago she was talking single payer health care, banning ARs and posing for glossy pictures with the WEF.
I expect something from Chieu Hoi VC before they can be trusted.
Let’s see her dismantle the federal highway camera pole citizen surveillance system on day one.
That's not the vibe I get. Guess we will soon see....I get that but Rubio would be too “adventuresome outside our borders and probably get giddy at being fawned over by other heads of state.
I bet he advocates for continued involvement in Ukraine and the ME.
I want the state department only doing ceremonial shit until we straighten out our internal problems.
That sir is a great point. And now making me question MY source on him. Of course, I’ve suspected my source a former USN officer is full of it 40% of the time.Radcliffe was DNI during the election steal in 2020.
With all his signals intel at hand he couldn’t catch any of the shenanigans?
Was he complicit?
He does seem to vote with the wind at times. I had high hopes for him; but man some of his votes are in line with the other side. He has a B average on the liberty scale; but yikes, the rest of those in AR are awful. I had high hopes for Westerman too; but he's failed in a number of areas as well.Not surprised my homey …Cotton Top Tom didn’t want included in any of Trumps choices ….yet !
His mom and pops have been grooming him to be the President since the first grade. He’s now the number 3 Republican in the Senate , figure he’ll ride it out until ?? It would be hard to find much dirt on him now , except smoozing with the elites.
He should stay where he is. He's as neocon/interventionist as it gets.Not surprised my homey …Cotton Top Tom didn’t want included in any of Trumps choices ….yet !
His mom and pops have been grooming him to be the President since the first grade. He’s now the number 3 Republican in the Senate , figure he’ll ride it out until ?? It would be hard to find much dirt on him now , except smoozing with the elites.
Boozman and Westerman are both worthless as tits on a boar hog. French Hill & Womack same-sameHe does seem to vote with the wind at times. I had high hopes for him; but man some of his votes are in line with the other side. He has a B average on the liberty scale; but yikes, the rest of those in AR are awful. I had high hopes for Westerman too; but he's failed in a number of areas as well.
Considering what a back stabbing piece of shit that Wray became , anyone would probably be better.And in another bid to further the "rumor mill," Newsmax is reporting on an interesting one... Kash Patel to replace Christopher Wray at the FBI!
Hmmmmmmmm......
An Infantry Officer with multiple combat deployments who shoots straight is far better than any SECDEF we’ve had in a long, long time. Most of them have been lawyers, senior advisors, and more political types with little ground-truth experience.I like Pete Hegseth as a person. As far as I know he hasn’t been corrupted …..yet.
Didn’t see this coming , hopefully he does an awesome job .
Considering the last handful of Secretaries the bar has been pretty low !
Very interestingAn Infantry Officer with multiple combat deployments who shoots straight is far better than any SECDEF we’ve had in a long, long time. Most of them have been lawyers, senior advisors, and more political types with little ground-truth experience.
From 1947-1997, we had these guys...
James Vincent Forrestal: After the highly-classified Majestic-12 committee hearings, they committed SECDEF Forrestal to a mental hospital against his will, denied his family access to him, then he “jumped out the window”. (In consequence of this, they named an Aircraft Carrier after him, CV-59, the same one that John McCain was on during the famous 1967 fire incident caused by an F-4B's Zuni rocket misfire.)
Louis Johnson (fired by Truman due to lack of confidence and replaced with Gen Marshall)
George C. Marshall: Famous among gun guys for his post-WWII AAR analyses that were controversial about what % of soldiers actually returned fire or engaged the enemy, soldier’s load, and various Infantry-related topics.
Rob Lovett
Charles E. Wilson
Neil H. McElroy
Thomas S. Gates Jr. (SECDEF during establishment of the nuke triad and Francis Gary Powers U-2 shoot-down over USSR)
Robert McNamara: JFK appointee, whiz kids, F-111 try-service fiasco, Gulf of Tonkin incident, Vietnam escalation under LBJ.
Clark Clifford: Oversaw the USS Liberty Investigation before he was SECDEF and said they ran every possible scenario and still couldn’t understand how they attacked the ship. Continued most of McNamara’s policies, but was opposed to escalation of Vietnam already in 1965. He was later part of the BCCI international criminal money-laundering banking scandal used by elites to evade regulatory interference from the nations.
Melvin Laird: Instituted gradual reforms with service budget caps and force structures under those caps, decentralized leadership, cut total military force size from 3.5 million in FY69 to 2.3 million in FY73. Was in the Pentagon for the B-1A, F-15, F-16, A-10, and Los Angeles Nuke Sub contract starts. Henry Kissinger bypassed Laird to the JCS and undermined his leadership, by isolating him from the President as much as possible.
Elliot Richardson: Brief stint as SECDEF under Nixon before becoming US AG
Bill Clements: Acting SECDEF after Richardson went to AG
James R. Schlesinger: Revised US policy on NATO, proposing they bear more share of the conventional forces counter to the USSR, and not rely on US nuclear weapons as their main deterrence and strategy. He pushed for increased defense spending by NATO countries during his time from 1973-1975. Evacuation of Saigon and SS Mayaguez happened under his time as SECDEF.
Donald Rumsfeld: Was brought in as the youngest SECDEF (43) after the "Halloween massacre" under Ford, along with George H.W. Bush as Director of CIA. He oversaw transition to an all-volunteer force, expansion of conventional and strategic forces, the Space Shuttle Program, and SALT II treaty.
Harold Brown: SECDEF under Jimmy Carter. Oversaw cancellation of B-1A but ordered USAF to continue its funded development. Emphasized existing nuclear triad programs to include B-52/ALCM combo instead of the Mach 2 B-1A/ALCM. Advanced Technology Bomber development was funded, as was initial MX/MIRV nuke missile to replace Minuteman and Titan missiles.
He also pushed for more NATO build-up among the NATO nations, and was part of the surrendering of the US claims on the Panama Canal Zone we built.
Caspar Weinberger 1981-1987: Reagan’s SECDEF who oversaw increased defense spending, reactivation of the B-1 program as the B-1B, increased force modernization, standards, deployment OPTEMPO, Joint Rapid Deployment Forces with the invasion of Grenada in Oct ’83, a simple plan to crush the Soviets by out-spending them in defense and overwhelming their capacity to keep pace with the US with the SDI program (as opposed to previous SECDEF/WH détente). 600-ship Navy, more nukes, more bombers, more fighters, more tanks, upgraded systems, missiles, and strengthening of NATO, Japan, and South Korea. Iran-Contra Affair
Frank Carlucci: He was Rumsfeld’s roommate at Princeton, went to Harvard, then into the State Dept. Filled in for Weinberger as SECDEF after Caspar resigned to take care of his wife. Carlucci part of Carlyle Group and PNAC, board of trustees for RAND, with holdings in General Dynamics, Westinghouse, and was Director of Wackenhut.
Dick Cheney: SECDEF under Bush41 from 1989-1993, where he slashed the budget and reduced US military personnel from 2.2 million to 1.8 million by ’93, while overseeing massive Base Realignment And Closures (BRAC). SECDEF during Just Cause invasion of Panama in Dec ’89 to oust Manuel Noriega.
Desert Storm 1991 campaign that saw the most decisive 20th Century military victory over the 4th-largest army in the world, measured in days. Was very supportive of smart plans for the invasion, and not impressed with some of the dumb ones. Component commanders were Vietnam vets who didn’t want their hands tied, went to the WH stating up front they wanted to go in with gloves off and end it quickly, which both Cheney and President Bush fully supported.
Council on Foreign Relations Director, Halliburton board member and CEO, and JINSA board of advisors.
Les Aspin: SECDEF under Clinton from 1993-1994. Don’t Ask-Don’t Tell, bottom-up review (lol), peacekeeping focus, weakness, females in combat duty positions shoved onto the force, downgraded SDI, emphasized environmental clean-up for NATO and NATO Partners for Peace. Aspin argued in-favor of Russian President Boris Yeltsin who wanted against NATO expansion, while Eastern Europe all were scrambling to join the alliance in fear of the inevitable. In Sep 1993, Les Aspin denied requests from Colin Powell and US TF Commander in Somalia for AC-130 and armor support in the “get Aidid” mission assigned to them.
William Perry: Weak, more appeasement, get rid of SDI, Rwanda, cut the DoD budget. More BRAC base closings announced in 1995. Continued to push Nunn-Lugar threat reduction act, which was used to also disarm Ukraine of conventional weapons. START II treaty proponent.
And any anti-MAGA Leftist has a problem with that, then they need to be scrutinized and looked at hard. McCarthyism? You GD right.patriot act needs to go away. it has never been anything but an ignore the constitution song. yea,ok foreigners even legals should prob be subjected to deep scrutiny esp chinese and ME. they shouldn't be given citizen's rights. if properly investigated and vetted to become citizens then drop the scrutiny on them. the only right illegals should have is the right to leave with the clothes on their backs nothing else. don't leave? stay in prison forever. that looks to be working in el salvador with their gangs. resist jail? extreme terminal rendition.
looking like the rinos are going to fight him on approval of most of his appointments. don't know the law. is an instant recall election in their state or an impeachment move in their state a possibility?
Agree. If the RINO’s are blocking what I’d call pretty much a mandate to clean this place up, then they need to be recalled ASAP….3 months or less. I’m not saying we cannot have discussion; but RINOs are absolutely disgusting and have no ethical standard. Hell, I’ll give democrat/commies credit, they follow their orders…sometimes too well. But these RINOs are the same RINOs that have been stabbing constituents in back for the better part of 2 decades…time to go.looking like the rinos are going to fight him on approval of most of his appointments. don't know the law. is an instant recall election in their state or an impeachment move in their state a possibility?
If the RINOs adopt an opposition posture out of the gate, Trump and his team can remind people of that in the mid-terms.Agree. If the RINO’s are blocking what I’d call pretty much a mandate to clean this place up, then they need to be recalled ASAP….3 months or less. I’m not saying we cannot have discussion; but RINOs are absolutely disgusting and have no ethical standard. Hell, I’ll give democrat/commies credit, they follow their orders…sometimes too well. But these RINOs are the same RINOs that have been stabbing constituents in back for the better part of 2 decades…time to go.
Same with the young ones….Katie Britt…gotta go baby…gotta go.
Learn more below about how you can win. First challenge coming soon!
View thread