And I just asserted that, in your lifetime you didn't receive any education that prevented you from making stupid talking points right here with me. So if I'm retarded, welcome to the Think Tank, genius.
Nothing wrong with ignoring the dip shits.
That's a cool story, but mine wasn't. I said exactly what I meant, in an unmistakable way.
No, it's true - Ignoring people in a conversation that you invited, doesn't *make* you weak at all. It's actually a symptom, not the problem, itself. Fragile people should just know better before they mix in, is all.
(which arguably, they do, hence the use of the feature)
I can walk buy a new stand and not pick up anything I don't want... It's called glossing over like water on a duck's back. I don't go tell the store owner to go hide those magazines. I don't tell the cable or TV station to stop playing TV shows I don't care for I simply just skip over them.
You most certainly invited yourself here. Special kind of stupid doest even cut it. We ignore fucktards for the same reason we turn off sirens. If the sirens constantly blares for no reason. It needs removed. Simple simple.
I guess you really haven't figured out how discussion forums work, or what happens when people respond to other people's posts."That you invited."
Yeah, in the way that adults do. You may not watch "The View", but do you demand it to be taken off the air? (not that you wouldn't, if you weren't pretending that you love freedom, for talking points)
False conclusion.
I bet if I squeezed your nose, it would honk.
My point has plenty of merit, in that those schools are not the same today, because none of the levels of education that precedes them, is the same. Simple as. That's why I took exception to the person touting their "classical education". Nobody in this room has a "classical education", in the "classical" sense - almost guaranteed. The initial comment was in reply to the seeming hatred for education, in general. Because yeah, if there's a choice between listening to an educated take, vs some internet rando, whose verbose soliloquys sound like they've been search engine optimized for the Fox News aficianado, then there's no doubt about who is more likely to get an ear. They've still got to make their case, but at least it's cohesive.
Do you not find it exhausting having to defend your comments and ego 24/7? Do you get some weird thrill out of derailing every thread?
If your willing to pay me in the form of small rifle primers then I will do anything.........................and I do mean anything!
You are a product of your own ego.
I don't know of anyone who isn't a product of their own ego. You seem to be rather supportive of the 45th POTUS. I have a hard time believing that you aren't OK with (at least some) people being ego-driven, on that basis, alone. My issue is more with people who don't aspire to be all that they can be - or even worse, disappointment, if what we're witnessing today, is full potential.
"Saying things about people you don't know..."
Ok, there is a rack with nothing but gay porn in it. Assuming you don't like gay porn{substitute straight porn in example if GP is your thing}, do you go look at the rack? There are people here who post nothing but gay porn{or straight porn whatever no judgment for that}. You want to look at it feel free. It doesn't make you virtuous. A masochist maybe, but not virtuous. Not that you are not virtuous, but it has nothing to do with what fucktards ramblings you decided to try and decipher online.
You plan on getting again........every year.
Hey Fauci...You plan on getting again........every year.
www.statnews.com
An interesting read:
Next-generation Covid-19 vaccines are supposed to be better. Some experts worry they could be worse
Some scientists are increasingly concerned that, because of a quirk of our own biology, future iterations of Covid-19 vaccines might not always be quite as effective as they are today.
I posted these thoughts of mine a while back. It may be worth a read (or not) for someone that missed it.The emotional hook is B.S. What is after it is possibly 100% true, 100% biased, or somewhere in between. ITs up to the end user to do his research, use his common sense and reach his own conclusions.
So, now i see they are saying "up to 90% effective." What the fuck is that even supposed to mean....
1600 flu cases in the U.S this year. 860k people tested for Flu. Did COVID end the Flu, or is it the flu?
Did you forget about some of the Karen ranting earlier in this thread? Because Karen was redefined there was one such post that had me howling it was one of the best of the last 12 months on any topic in the Bear Pit.
Don’t bring that kind of common sense logic here. That is uncalled for in this unprecedented time... Just think of the kids lives for Christ’s sake.
Lol, remember you're talking about immediate side effects... No one even knows what the next 6+ months looks like.
