PRS Talk PRs finale

Was safety third involved.
dahliabunni-popcorn.gif
 
Last edited:
where can I find out what rifles / optics were used by the top 20?
If they have the info in their PRS profile, then this would be a good start:

 
  • Like
Reactions: BurtG
After shooting a lot of matches this year I found you see very few Schmidt’s. You see a lot of ZCO’s now which is what myself and my main two shooting partners all shoot. Leupold is definitely nice for the money but I’m not a fan. I personally have a ZCO 5-27, ATACR 7-35 and a Razor Gen 2 4.5-27 and would gladly shoot a match with either three.
 
After shooting a lot of matches this year I found you see very few Schmidt’s. You see a lot of ZCO’s now which is what myself and my main two shooting partners all shoot. Leupold is definitely nice for the money but I’m not a fan. I personally have a ZCO 5-27, ATACR 7-35 and a Razor Gen 2 4.5-27 and would gladly shoot a match with either three.
Yes I’m just surprised to see people winning when they compromise on scope selection
 
Well not very well anyhow or you would of been at the finale to see what the top 20 used…
Correct. Work and family takes my time.

It’s my favorites thing to do but can’t do it often. I’m a mid pack finisher. 20s-30s out of. 50-80 shooter one days. Last 2 day i shot I was 66 out of I think 200
 
Yes I’m just surprised to see people winning when they compromise on scope selection
I’m going to say after shooting in matches and in some squads and with some of the top shooters this year that if you give them about any scope within reason they would still finish towards the top.
 
Last edited:
the top spots are all sponsored, so who cares what they use, they are paid to use it and most would sell their souls for free anything

Like Team Gap is sponsored by Bushnell, they have a GAP reticle for them, I just got one of the "Team scopes" from them and it was broken out of the box, so why would you go with a sponsored shooter uses when they are being compensated to use it.

S&B are not sold as much here in the US Anymore, all the dealers gave up their dealerships because EURO Optics goes direct and the rest can't match the prices, so only Euro and a few legacy places sell them.


Because they stopped being used widely about 8+ years ago, they stopped innovating with a lot of stuff Comp shooters want. I still run a bunch of S&Bs but not nearly as much as I used too, all Zeiss and ZCo now really with the others mixed in.
 
I’m going to say after shooting in matches and in some squads and with some of the top shooters this year that if you have them about any scope within reason they would still finish towards the top.
I’m just mainly asking if AI made any headway versus the Mpa mdt etc With their new comp rifle they have now.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Rexwagon
the top spots are all sponsored, so who cares what they use, they are paid to use it and most would sell their souls for free anything

Like Team Gap is sponsored by Bushnell, they have a GAP reticle for them, I just got one of the "Team scopes" from them and it was broken out of the box, so why would you go with a sponsored shooter uses when they are being compensated to use it.

S&B are not sold as much here in the US Anymore, all the dealers gave up their dealerships because EURO Optics goes direct and the rest can't match the prices, so only Euro and a few legacy places sell them.


Because they stopped being used widely about 8+ years ago, they stopped innovating with a lot of stuff Comp shooters want. I still run a bunch of S&Bs but not nearly as much as I used too, all Zeiss and ZCo now really with the others mixed in.

This is the case for many of the top shooters but not all of them, Buschman who won it all is not sponsored by anyone and still loads all of his ammo on a lee press… Your point of not following what the top guys “recommend” is a valid one though in most cases as many of them have ulterior motives. However the fact they run the gear successfully is a testament of that gear being capable of performing at very high levels. Often times guys concerned about the performance level of a top tier optic are the ones that cant perform to the level requiring a mid tier one…
 
I thought we were talking about how anything but a Schmidt is a “compromise”….now we are are “mainly” talking about market penetration of AI chassis products?

This is a strong first effort bud. It might take a while to regain any credibility after this but I think with your extensive experience in 20-30th place, you have the persistence to claw your way back to relevance in at least one thread on the forum.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: b6graham
Yep, Jeff who tied for second is only sponsored by a gunsmith. He shoots the builds and optics he wants to.

Same here, I am not a top 20 shooter though. I have a smith who sponsors me and I run what I want. I give my honest opinion on gear to new shooters and save them headaches as much as possible. Contrary to hide belief most PRS guys are helpful and honest. There is a lot less money getting thrown around than many are lead to believe. It is concentrated at the very top and among industry insiders. Half the jersey logos are for aesthetics or very small discounts.
 
thought we were talking about how anything but a Schmidt is a “compromise”
No. Everything is a compromise unless it is a zero compromise.

now we are are “mainly” talking about market penetration of AI chassis products?
They have a complete comp rifle available now. I said. Nothing about chassis

This is a strong first effort bud. It might take a while to regain any credibility after this but I think with your extensive experience in 20-30th place
You should come to the mdt frostbite. I’m sure your shooting is akin to the accuracy of a godless communist ak47. While mine is more like a god fearing American mk 12



I have a hard time believing you shoot any matches with your prior comments. Another Internet forum know it all know nothing.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: b6graham
the top spots are all sponsored, so who cares what they use, they are paid to use it and most would sell their souls for free anything

Like Team Gap is sponsored by Bushnell, they have a GAP reticle for them, I just got one of the "Team scopes" from them and it was broken out of the box, so why would you go with a sponsored shooter uses when they are being compensated to use it.

S&B are not sold as much here in the US Anymore, all the dealers gave up their dealerships because EURO Optics goes direct and the rest can't match the prices, so only Euro and a few legacy places sell them.


Because they stopped being used widely about 8+ years ago, they stopped innovating with a lot of stuff Comp shooters want. I still run a bunch of S&Bs but not nearly as much as I used too, all Zeiss and ZCo now really with the others mixed in.
That all makes sense. Thanks.