Put here so members , if they own a T36, understand what has happened.
PSA: If you own a TommyBuilt T36 you now own a machine gun (ATF ruling).
- Thread starter craigos
- Start date
Put here so members , if they own a T36, understand what has happened.
Well if it’s going to be illegal in a semi auto state, you may as make it full auto then 
#dontcomply
#dontcomply
Is there anyone working at the ATF who possesses a single ounce of brains when it comes to the subject of firearms? Or are they all "experts" in alcohol and tobacco?
With that train of thought, everyone that made that determination should be arrested for prostitution. Each of them possesses the ability to be a whore.
Does the ATF have reason to believe the existing design will actually operate in full auto?
yes but the irony is the changes TB made are the same HK made to the SL8 to make it semi only. Its ATF up to its old tricks.
Maybe she can get something done. One reason she got kicked off a Congressional steering committee as soon as Biden was elected.
Yeah that’s going nowhere, if not because of who introduced it, let alone the dems have no intent on slowing down the gun control push.
I can't comply with anymore of this bullshit and still pretend I'm free and have Rights. Either America stands for something or it's just a sham and in that case, it's a free for all, last man standing "if I get you before you get me" sort of shit.
If you insist on burning down the country, I'll bring the matches.
Personally I wanna see their 5000 people go door to door enforcing some of this bullshit on millions of Americans unwilling to comply. I was hoping they'd make braces their last stand. They'll need warrants for every house. Think about that. Just tell them "FUCK NO" and what are they gonna do? Demand it in writing? "I sold it" "I lost it" "left it somewhere, sorry" "come back he ain't here" "it's in the safe, forgot combo (when it's actually not)" --this could take all goddamn century!
They couldn't stop the pot heads or fags, not pretending they can stop a whole country of armed citizens backed up with 2A Rights many are willing to die for.
If you insist on burning down the country, I'll bring the matches.
Personally I wanna see their 5000 people go door to door enforcing some of this bullshit on millions of Americans unwilling to comply. I was hoping they'd make braces their last stand. They'll need warrants for every house. Think about that. Just tell them "FUCK NO" and what are they gonna do? Demand it in writing? "I sold it" "I lost it" "left it somewhere, sorry" "come back he ain't here" "it's in the safe, forgot combo (when it's actually not)" --this could take all goddamn century!
They couldn't stop the pot heads or fags, not pretending they can stop a whole country of armed citizens backed up with 2A Rights many are willing to die for.
I think that means you can't be liable for possessing one prior to the ruling, but now with the ruling you are liable going forward. It isn't a blanket immunity as you suggest. They have done similar bullshit things with all sorts of goods and substances, but that has always been how it shakes out.
I read that different but since I don't own one I wasn't going to comment. I read that as "I made a firearm and expect you to pay $225 to fix my error."
How was it an error? The ATF reclassified his product as a machine gun despite using the same mechanism of the factory delivered H&K product, end of story. The ATF is going after little fish before they come for the whales.
That's what I've been looking for. The process on how a design/model gets approved. I misunderstood the age of the design.
I dont recall exactly what happened it was long ago, but a friend bought a semi auto copy of a S&W 76
and I believe he had to return it due to a BATF ruling.
and I believe he had to return it due to a BATF ruling.
So by making this ruling, is the ATF allowing those who own these receivers to register them as a Class 3 firearm? If so, doesn't that throw out previous rulings by the ATF?
not if they were made after 86.....but as a company...they should have taken this to court
Similar threads
