That's probably it.I wouldn't doubt 86% responding with approval... Probably higher and they toned down the numbers to make it look more believable.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
To enter, all you need to do is add an image of yourself at the range below!
Join the contestThat's probably it.I wouldn't doubt 86% responding with approval... Probably higher and they toned down the numbers to make it look more believable.
if you were in the military, did they rake you over the coals about your relationship? In my case, they actually make me sit before a committee who interrogated me because of the clearances I had back then.The only thing Russia ever did to me was give me my girlfriend and our beautiful child. Ukraine gave me corrupt politicians.
Checkmate OP
ALL of the many Russian-Americans I know except for two people think Putin is the greatest. As do their extended relations over there. And of those 2, one is married to a Ukrainian, and the other claims to be anti-Putin but is 100% pro-Russia/anti-Ukraine over this conflict.....so I'm not sure how "anti-Putin" she really is.Russian poll out today show Putin has an 86% approval rate...
again that's a bit hypocritical.What conflict have we fought since WWII where we weren’t getting shot at with Russian weapons?
I have zero problems arming the Ukrainians. The Russians set the president.
Have you seen Mariopol? There is nothing left. They raised the city exactly like they did in Grozny. You are the one with zero basis to assume everything is a military target, but everything IS a military target. We’ve watched the Russians do this before. It’s nothing new. This isn’t an antiseptic war with JDAMs. This is like a Nazi blitz. The object is not just to destroy Ukraine’s military, but to kill as many as possible to demoralize them. It’s backfiring. The Russian Army is demoralizing itself. Imagine if we were ordered into Canada and started destroying their cities and shelling their population. How do you think our moral would hold up?Wanton shelling? Thats a huge stretch, and your words imply that rockets are flying willy-nilly, just sending shit downrange. Where is this occurring? What facilities are shelled that have not been used as cover by the Ukranian army? Seriously, specifics. I am honestly listening, so give me facts that I can chew on. Where, when, evidence please.
Do I think opinions will change? Probably not, but I want to hear the detailed facts associated with this opinion as I am genuinely curious.
are you completely unaware that war has been going on since 2014? for fuck's sake dude. much of that destruction has existed since 2014..Have you seen Mariopol? There is nothing left. They raised the city exactly like they did in Grozny. You are the one with zero basis to assume everything is a military target, but everything IS a military target. We’ve watched the Russians do this before. It’s nothing new. This isn’t an antiseptic war with JDAMs. This is like a Nazi blitz. The object is not just to destroy Ukraine’s military, but to kill as many as possible to demoralize them. It’s backfiring. The Russian Army is demoralizing itself. Imagine if we were ordered into Canada and started destroying their cities and shelling their population. How do you think our moral would hold up?
Wake up.
not, it is butt the fuck out and don't let corrupt intelligence and policy makers lure you into funding or fighting another war.Who gives two shits about hypocrisy? It's a ridiculous standard. I guess just the blame America Firsters, left and right, when it suits them.
I need actual data. Find the info and post it here please.Have you seen Mariopol? There is nothing left. They raised the city exactly like they did in Grozny. You are the one with zero basis to assume everything is a military target, but everything IS a military target. We’ve watched the Russians do this before. It’s nothing new. This isn’t an antiseptic war with JDAMs. This is like a Nazi blitz. The object is not just to destroy Ukraine’s military, but to kill as many as possible to demoralize them. It’s backfiring. The Russian Army is demoralizing itself. Imagine if we were ordered into Canada and started destroying their cities and shelling their population. How do you think our moral would hold up?
Wake up.
the propaganda is so shameless. Ukraine is even doing photo ops of their soldiers hugging puppies and kittens, aimed exactly at the bleeding heart types here.not, it is butt the fuck out and don't let corrupt intelligence and policy makers lure you into funding or fighting another war.
too late.
Is that supposed to be funny?I need actual data. Find the info and post it here please.
funny how you sit on a throne of moral authority built upon a pile of corpses, and dare to point fingers.Who gives two shits about hypocrisy? It's a ridiculous standard. I guess just the blame America Firsters, left and right, when it suits them.
The level of propaganda is absolutely insane. I wonder how much of the emotion we have here on both sides of this argument here are a result of massaged information. If we think this isn’t happening we are wrong. Even we on this forum are tearing each other apart - for what?the propaganda is so shameless. Ukraine is even doing photo ops of their soldiers hugging puppies and kittens, aimed exactly at the bleeding heart types here.
WTF are you even talking about? Which throne am I on, where did I get my corpses, and what fingers am I pointing? I am merely saying that truth that, in matters of state, the strong do as they will, and the weak suffer what they must. Hypocrisy has nothing to do with it. Neither does moral authority.funny how you sit on a throne of moral authority built upon a pile of corpses, and dare to point fingers.
It’s never been any different. Rape, pillage and plunder. And outright genocide. But it’s different this time because it’s happening when we are alive and the media says we must care above our own borders and national security. Who cared here about Amin? Or Pol Pot? Or Sudan, Chad or the Congo? Never mind South America. Or human trafficking. Why is Ukraine now so special that it earns our attention?name one war in history where common citizens didnt feel the brunt of it. it goes back millenia.
US just calls it collateral damage and shrugs their shoulders.![]()
if the "weak" are suffering, it is only because of zelensky and the corrupt western powers that baited putin into acting, and then failed to admit their mistakes and give in to somewhat reasonable demands (basically stop killing ethnic russians in eastern ukraine).WTF are you even talking about? Which throne am I on, where did I get my corpses, and what fingers am I pointing? I am merely saying that truth that, in matters of state, the strong do as they will, and the weak suffer what they must. Hypocrisy has nothing to do with it. Neither does moral authority.
Because the global media industrial complex tells us what to care about and support, and they are very convincing.It’s never been any different. Rape, pillage and plunder. And outright genocide. But it’s different this time because it’s happening when we are alive and the media says we must care above our own borders and national security. Who cared here about Amin? Or Pol Pot? Or Sudan, Chad or the Congo? Never mind South America. Or human trafficking. Why is Ukraine now so special that it earns our attention?
they told us that the serbs were to blame, and so we believed them.Because the global media industrial complex tells us what to care about and support, and they are very convincing.
They could honestly be making most of it up. everything we see could be edited and CGI. there is no way for me to know whats real or not unless I see it with my own 2 eyes. they control information so well there would be no way for contradictory information to propogate and if it did they would make it out to be fake.
I haven’t watched tv in 7-8 years other than a few minutes when I go see my family few times a year. It’s pretty great not having it.Here's the way I look at it. If I got up tomorrow and Putin had taken Ukraine, I still wouldn't care. If Ukraine had successfully repelled the Russian army, no cares given. I personally don't support either side and think we have way bigger issues to deal with here at home. See, I'm not a karen or a ken. I'm all for personal choice and letting those two work it out.
And, FWIW, Europe is more concerned with keeping their asses warm, which is why Russian NG supplies have not only resumed, but increased around 20%. The US is posturing with sanctions as they have contracts to uphold. Russian oil is still coming into the US and at a faster rate than before because they want the contract fulfilled. I'd take most world news with a grain of salt. The only thing television is good for anymore is background noise. Maybe a weather report, but that will change by lunch time anyway.
Would love to get rid of it, but I have a wife who glues her ass to the couch with her Hallmark on.I have watched tv in 7-8 years other than a few minutes when I go see my family few times a year. It’s pretty great not having it.
UghWould love to get rid of it, but I have a wife who glues her ass to the couch with her Hallmark on.
are you completely unaware that war has been going on since 2014? for fuck's sake dude. much of that destruction has existed since 2014..
![]()
Caught in the Crossfire in Eastern Ukraine
Battles in eastern Ukraine have surged anew, with the civilian population suffering dozens of deaths from ongoing rocket attacks.www.theatlantic.com
if the "weak" are suffering, it is only because of zelensky and the corrupt western powers that baited putin into acting, and then failed to admit their mistakes and give in to somewhat reasonable demands (basically stop killing ethnic russians in eastern ukraine).
instead, they chose to give the nazis even more powerful weapons, well before russia invaded.
what were the nazi battalions going to do with those javelins?
we see now, don't we, except it would have been directed entirely on the folks that live and fight in the donbas region.
graham said he was doing it and it is all on video. he told them he was going to give them what they need to destroy the enemy once and for all, and they were gearing up for it.
that is was just one story from 2015. much has happened since then.Umm... no. "Much" is too strong of an adjective. Most of the photos in that report were of Donetsk. He was referring to Mariupol
Between your pictures and these, it would seem that wherever the Russians go in Ukraine they turn to shit.
View attachment 7840311
View attachment 7840315
View attachment 7840316
View attachment 7840328
View attachment 7840330View attachment 7840329
I respectfully disagree with your statement.
or the made up chemical weapon attacks in syria by the blue hats or white hats or whoever. when Obama tried to pull an Iraq in syria and Putin stepped in and said nope.they told us that the serbs were to blame, and so we believed them.
then wikileaks showed that the cia flipped a coin on who we would blame and target with our morally authorized killings.
i mean, a row of bodies in a ditch can be whoever they say it is. serbs they fingered had been working with the cia already.
The object is not just to destroy Ukraine’s military, but to kill as many as possible to demoralize them.
that is was just one story from 2015. much has happened since then.
no doubt there is new destruction, and no doubt the ukes are setting up in civilian areas and near churches and schools, just like isis and palestinians.
you mean the Khazar mafia rule Ukraine.because we dont simp for Neo-Nazi states?.......weird flex but ok......
1. Sending troops to UkrainePlease tell us exactly how this was started by Russia. In detail.
I am sorry I clearly made a mistake here, americans obviously do not have a concept of border keeping. Nevermind this question, I have no time to explain what borders mean.Please do explain how Ukraine is faulty for keeping its borders.
This clearly went over their heads.Funny, but...
Seriously though... I've looked it up and it ain't in there.
It appears that it was offered as part of the negotiations for German Reunification in February 1990, and the assurances were quite strong at the time, but by May, 1990, Gorbachev apparently conceded, "nations could choose which military alliances they would join”, in turn for an American promise to, “seek to avoid doing anything that would damage [the USSR’s] position in the world.”
By September, even that last assurance didn't make it into the final agreement.
So in the early days of the negotiation it was offered and how that offer would look was intently discussed, but as the negotiations dragged on, the Soviet Union was growing weaker in reality and thus at the negotiating table. The US realized they didn't need to offer the USSR such a wide concession and the deal turned more favorably to the United States/NATO interests.
The final deal that was agreed to did not include a commitment to not expand NATO. By the time the treaty was ratified, the USSR wouldn't have been able to hold on to Germany anyways. There was nothing the West needed to concede to anyways. But there were some concessions...
-Germany could not have a nuclear arsenal of its own.
-Germany could not commit acts tending to and undertaken with the intent to disturb the peaceful relations between nations, especially to prepare for aggressive war.
-Germany would undertake to reduce the personnel strength of the armed forces of the united Germany to 370,000 (ground, air and naval forces) within three to four years.
-Among other things....
But no mention of NATO is made.
Here is the document for review:
Or perhaps I am looking at the wrong document? Is there another agreement that this promise applies to?
This clearly went over their heads.
Please explain everything to them like they were 3 years old. One of them pointed this out to me and it has been a great help.
They just cannot register that much text at a time. Maybe add some funny pictures too, they are really keen on those
Some set their minds against something, and nothing will change it.
I am curious if I misread the dang thing or if I am missing some magic document somewhere. I'd genuinely like to know.
You need to let go of the idea that Biden is making any dicesions. You'll then realize our situation is much worse than you had thought.It would be a pleasant fiction to believe that Biden was not an incoherent, incontinent and incompetent fool, but was truly a hidden mastermind capable of out witting "The Vladimir Putin" by turning Ukraine into a giant bear trap.
Unfortunately, I am reminded that there may be truth to the notion that he needs a diaper from time to time and that fiction is quickly dispelled.
Lol. Go fuck yourself you little imbecile.No. I’m genuinely serious. They are a large number of people here that believe different than you. This is your opportunity to change their mind.
You don’t know what the fuck you’re talking about! Where were you stationed during the Yugo civil war? We’re you there? Have you witnessed genocide and ethnic cleansing?they told us that the serbs were to blame, and so we believed them.
then wikileaks showed that the cia flipped a coin on who we would blame and target with our morally authorized killings.
i mean, a row of bodies in a ditch can be whoever they say it is. serbs they fingered had been working with the cia already.
On who's morals/principals we are led to believe?You don’t know what the fuck you’re talking about! Where were you stationed during the Yugo civil war? We’re you there? Have you witnessed genocide and ethnic cleansing?
Just because there aren’t any “good guys” doesn’t mean the right thing to do is watch. Sometimes there are no good or clear choices, so the just man relies on his morals and principals. Some don’t got ‘em.
We are all being played.On who's morals/principals we are led to believe?
How many lies have been fed to the populace in order to get the agenda the government wants?
Who gets to decide which of these world events gets our attention? There's conflict every where. Which ones do we need to get involved in? Those of national security? Well, that line is abused as much as being called a racist
Here, let me help you. I have even added some that you would agree with. The first one is particularly good.Lol. Go fuck yourself you little imbecile.
I would no sooner try to change the minds of the idiots who think Russia is justified in pulverizing their neighbor, than argue with a Taliban about the supremacy of Islam. It’s all the people reading this drivel I’m posting for, because if you read this shit you would think Ukraine attacked Russia.
I do stand on mountains of corpses, mostly in Former Yugoslavia. I know what this is, because IVE BEEN IN IT.
We agree that we should not get directly involved. There is only hysterics and propaganda on one side that does not believe their lying eyes.
Mariupol is not in the Russian breakaway provinces. Just near them. It WAS a beautiful and historic city.
![]()
Now it’s gone.
![]()
Data? What a fucking moron.