Furman,
There are lots of choices out there that might meet your needs. The more expensive ones will provide higher level ballistics information for your shots, while others, like the Leica 2400 or Sig 2200 are more basic in those terms, but do not lack in terms of ranging performance. Just depends what your needs are. In terms of false ranges, a smaller beam divergence is probably the best way to ensure you hit what you are aiming at, and not hitting something else. Leica's (and Vec x) have a very small divergence, smallest in class IIRC, and the laser's shape is optimized to minimize 'close range' accidental hits. The Sigs divergence is about twice the size and is round, but they have settings (last range etc.) that help minimize close range accidental hits.
There are a bunch of other things to consider in terms of workflow, glass etc. I have a review on the 2700b on this board that might help, but I'll also be in Northern Indiana in a few days with the Leica 2700 and the Sig 2400 BDX, doing some (hopefully!) snow testing for a review...though mother nature seems like she may not cooperate. Anyway, not sure if you are anywhere near South Bend, but if you are, you are welcome to come check them out in the field if that would help.