Redding Neck sizer die issue - anyone seen this?

ReaperDriver

Sergeant
Full Member
Minuteman
  • Sep 5, 2009
    1,331
    167
    60
    Vegas Baby!
    Ok, so I just got my reloading gear set up and made my 1st batch of 90 x .308 rounds last night to do some load development shooting today. I made up 30 each of 175SMK, 168 AMAX, and 155 SMK Palmas all using Federal once fired brass shot in this gun's chamber. All made using Redding S-type competition neck die set.

    Anyway, so the reloading process on Sunday goes fine and I chamber check the 1st 5 rounds to verify nothing is amiss. I neck sized only since the brass was only fired once as an original factory round. When I get to the range and start shooting, I find that 1 in 3 to 4 rounds won't chamber. The bolt will physically not close and I'm not willing to take a hammer to it to see how far I can go to chamber it. The ones that do chamber, seem normal - i.e. no excessive force needed to close the bolt, and they all shot normally.

    I loaded all my 175s and 168 to 2.815 OAL and the 155 were loaded to 2.780 OAL. I re-checked the ones that didn't chamber out on the range and they were the same OALs as the ones that did chamber fine. Plus there were no rifling marks on the bullet to show the bullet was seated too far out. Another Hide member who was out on the range with me suggested the shoulder was too far out and that was preventing it from chambering. But we all (him included) thought that was unlikely because it was only once fired brass and why would the shoulder already need to be bumped this early? However, we later confirmed that the shoulder was indeed the cause of the round not chambering. So now the next question is why?

    So, long story longer, after some detective work - we discovered that the bell in the neck sizer die was hanging up in the mouth as the round was going back out of the die after sizing the neck and that resistance was stretching the neck and shoulder out of specs. I wondered why there was little resistance while the case was going in the neck sizer bushing but I was having to really pull to get it back out. I felt I properly lubed the necks and the bushing - so I don't think that was the cause. I really verified the problem was the bell (ball) that screws over the depriming rod when I removed that and just neck sized some brass without depriming it. No resistance either way and the shoulder was not touched at all. IOW the shoulder was fine and well within spec to chamber because it wasn't being stretched on the way out by the neck bell.

    So (sorry for the novel) - did Redding put the wrong bell in my die set or are others seeing this same issue? Its very annoying because I have about 40 rounds to pull the bullet off of and completely body size the brass from scratch. Why would you go to the trouble of sizing the neck down to a spcific diameter and then have the bell just widen the case mouth out again as the shell is extracted from the neck bushing? I'd remove it completely, but its the only thing holding my depriming pin in place.
     
    Re: Redding Neck sizer die issue - anyone seen this?

    Same thing happend to my 308 neck sized rounds.thanks for posting this,i was trying to figure out what the hell?
     
    Re: Redding Neck sizer die issue - anyone seen this?

    <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: 81sfo</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Same thing happend to my 308 neck sized rounds.thanks for posting this,i was trying to figure out what the hell? </div></div>

    No worries - I'm a big fan of sharing knowledge, expecially fuck ups. Thanks to Hide member Sako308 for going above and beyond in helping diagnose this issue and get me back up and running by lending me a Redding decapping bell from a .280 something die set. Its too small to affect the .308 neck on the way back out. I'm going to contact Redding and ask WTF?

    Its at least nice to see I'm not the only one with this issue and that I'm not just doing something wrong.
     
    Re: Redding Neck sizer die issue - anyone seen this?

    Im new to the neck sizing deal and just bought an expensive Redding Comp die set too,but after having to pull 30 bullets out of the loaded rounds i neck sized,im pissed.Wish i could get more info on this issue too.
     
    Re: Redding Neck sizer die issue - anyone seen this?

    I'm going to contact Redding tomorrow and I'll let you know what I find out. My friend also has Redding dies and his has a substantially small bell in his .308 die than I do - but his is an older set. I wonder if redding changed something or if they have a batch of dies with the wrong part.

    In any event - if you don't have access to a smaller bell to hold your decapping pin in - the only way to avoid the problem again is to remove the neck bushing and then deprime all your brass. Then replace the neck bushing but remove the deprime pin and bell so you can neck size w/o screwing up the neck as the bell passes back through the mouth of the case. It adds a step, but I guess its better than nothing until Redding can get us the correct part.
     
    Re: Redding Neck sizer die issue - anyone seen this?

    Did you measure the size of the expander ball at all perchance to see if its too big?

    Second question would be, why run the the expander ball at all? The beauty of the bushing die is NOT using the ball IMO, That damn ball will knock you necks out of concentricity.

    I run my FL S-Type die without the expander ball, and use a bushing .003 less than the diameter of a loaded round.

    HTH
     
    • Like
    Reactions: crnokrug
    Re: Redding Neck sizer die issue - anyone seen this?

    <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: JLM</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Did you measure the size of the expander ball at all perchance to see if its too big?

    Second question would be, why run the the expander ball at all? The beauty of the bushing die is NOT using the ball IMO, That damn ball will knock you necks out of concentricity.

    I run my FL S-Type die without the expander ball, and use a bushing .003 less than the diameter of a loaded round.

    HTH</div></div>


    That is good advice. I put the expander ball back on ONLY to straighten out dented necks (very rarely).
     
    Re: Redding Neck sizer die issue - anyone seen this?

    Every set of S-type dies I have ever purchased (5 sets) has come with 2 "collars" to hold in the decapping pin. One is larger and an "expander" the other is considerably smaller and doesn't touch the case mouth. I suggest you re-check the box they came in and if not there, call redding and have one shipped.
     
    Re: Redding Neck sizer die issue - anyone seen this?

    You should have got a decapping pin retainer with the die so you can use it without the sizer button on the decapping rod.
    You may have to use a larger bushing so you just size the neck enough to hold a bullet and no size button to stretch the case.
    Then use a body die to do any body sizing required later on.
     
    Re: Redding Neck sizer die issue - anyone seen this?

    Ditch the expander ball and your problem will go away. Of course then you have to have the right size bushing. If you selected the bushing as redding suggests and have .001 to .003 neck tension w/o the expander then your golden.
     
    Re: Redding Neck sizer die issue - anyone seen this?

    <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: 19Scout77</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Every set of S-type dies I have ever purchased (5 sets) has come with 2 "collars" to hold in the decapping pin. One is larger and an "expander" the other is considerably smaller and doesn't touch the case mouth. I suggest you re-check the box they came in and if not there, call redding and have one shipped. </div></div>

    Ooops, never mind.
    blush.gif
    In my haste to unpack - I set the little baggy with the smaller collar on the workbench.

    I guess my 40 or so bullets to pull is my punishment for being a dumbass noob.
     
    Re: Redding Neck sizer die issue - anyone seen this?

    <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Tomekeuro85</div><div class="ubbcode-body">So lets say I have the FL S type busing die. I can take off the expander ball and the rounds will size fine at the proper neck diameter? </div></div>

    Well yes and no. YES if you pick the correct size bushing for whatever brass you are using, based upon that brass's neck thickness. NO, if you don't use the right bushing. The bushing size is what set the amount of neck tension.
     
    Re: Redding Neck sizer die issue - anyone seen this?

    I always figured the expander ball would mess up your neck sizing on its way out by expanding the neck beyond what you wanted. Somehow it doesn't work that way though, and it is nice to have the expander on there for when you size dented cases, especially since I use winchester brass and that stuff comes with the necks all out of round. However, I've never been able to figure out how to remove the expander ball. I've twisted on that thing until I'm blue in the face to no avail. After seeing these issues I might want to remove mine.
     
    Re: Redding Neck sizer die issue - anyone seen this?

    If you shake the die can you hear the bushing rattle a bit? It's supposed to float about three mils axially, IIRC.

    Another thing is no inside neck lube will eventually build up galled brass on the ball and cause the problem you're seeing.

    I switched to the carbide ball and use dry neck lube without any issues of this type. And I gage every round to make sure the shoulder isn't being distorted. A Wilson gage is invaluable this way although it won't tell you if the case is out of spec for the chamber shape, just that the datum on the shoulder is in spec wrt the casehead. Same thing with a LNL headspace gage but it's more of a pita to gage every round with.

    If you're chamfering the necks prior to sizing you might want to look very carefully under magnification at the outer rim of the mouth to see if a 'large' build-up of brass, more than a burr, is being created. I've seen this happen and it can cause the neck to be substantially oversized increasing drag on the ball. It's possible to see evidence of a bit of a collapsed and distorted outer edge to the case mouth as well.

    HTH
     
    Re: Redding Neck sizer die issue - anyone seen this?

    I just use a cheap Lee full length sizer
    wink.gif


    If you're not turning case necks to a uniform thickness, I think the bushing die is just screwing you up more, especially without the expander ball.

    I have a Redding type S, but quit using it when I noticed a DECREASE in accuracy after switching to it. Accuracy came back when I went back to the "cheap" Lee die I bought as a stopgap until my Redding showed up off backorder.

    YMMV - especially with turned neck cases.

    Donuts anybody?
     
    Re: Redding Neck sizer die issue - anyone seen this?

    There is a lot more to using bushing dies than just running a case into them without regard for bushing size, neck thickness, and expander usage(or not). The bushing dies can help with many things including brass life. I have used cases beyond 50 reloads and give most of the credit to the bushing dies and proper use.

    If you take the time to troubleshoot the issue like the original poster did; you will achieve good results.

    You should pick a bushing that is .001" to .003" or so smaller than "loaded" outside neck diameter. If you do this with an expander, you will (most often) not have the shoulder stretch issue. I use an expander in mine and have not had a shoulder stretch problem in thousands of rounds. I have also run them without the expander and had no problems. I went back to the expander to improve consistency and it seems to have helped a bit, likely because I do not turn necks.

    Just my dumb-assed opinion.
    laugh.gif
     
    Re: Redding Neck sizer die issue - anyone seen this?

    Are you using the right size bushing ? Most Federal brass is on the thick side. If your bushing is too small and sizes the ID to .303 then you will need more force to remove the expander ball than if sized to .307. Take out the expander ball and size the neck and measure the ID, then you will see if you need a larger bushing. I bet this is your problem. I prefer to use the expander ball, unless the brass is neck turned. I believe the neck tension has to be more uniform using the expander ball. You can also measure the expander ball and see if it is too small.

    david
     
    Re: Redding Neck sizer die issue - anyone seen this?

    <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Rafael</div><div class="ubbcode-body">There is a lot more to using bushing dies than just running a case into them without regard for bushing size, neck thickness, and expander usage(or not). The bushing dies can help with many things including brass life. I have used cases beyond 50 reloads and give most of the credit to the bushing dies and proper use.

    If you take the time to troubleshoot the issue like the original poster did; you will achieve good results.

    You should pick a bushing that is .001" to .003" or so smaller than "loaded" outside neck diameter. If you do this with an expander, you will (most often) not have the shoulder stretch issue. I use an expander in mine and have not had a shoulder stretch problem in thousands of rounds. I have also run them without the expander and had no problems. I went back to the expander to improve consistency and it seems to have helped a bit, likely because I do not turn necks.

    Just my dumb-assed opinion.
    laugh.gif
    </div></div>

    Raf, that's interesting. Back to the ball and do you get better concentricity or what do you feel its accomplishing for you?
     
    Re: Redding Neck sizer die issue - anyone seen this?

    <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: al redneck</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Are you using the right size bushing ? Most Federal brass is on the thick side. If your bushing is too small and sizes the ID to .303 then you will need more force to remove the expander ball than if sized to .307. Take out the expander ball and size the neck and measure the ID, then you will see if you need a larger bushing. I bet this is your problem. I prefer to use the expander ball, unless the brass is neck turned. I believe the neck tension has to be more uniform using the expander ball. You can also measure the expander ball and see if it is too small.

    david </div></div>

    I'm pretty sure I'm using the right bushings. I measured the loaded Federal brass (factory round) and it measured right at about .3385 so I used the .336 bushing to go slightly less than .003 smaller as per the instructions and tips I've read. The FC brass has a fairly thick case mouth wall however (compared to my Win, BHA, Rem, etc brass) so I think the expander ball was just too thick and caused the brass to stretch on the way out. The case wall thickness on the FC brass was avg of .0150-.0155 whereas my Win and BHA brass is about .0140, so a fairly big difference.

    I think I'm going to try without the expander ball and see what happens with the accuracy. I get the idea that the expander ball will true up the case roundness from the inside, but unless it has a significant dent in the mouth, I would think the bushing itself would round the mouth out as well.

    And yes, I made sure the bushing rattled a bit to keep it free floating in the die.

    edit: I also measured the other loaded rounds like the Win and BHA and the neck diameter is about .334, so I plan to use the .332 neck bushing when loading that brass. Am I on the right track?
     
    Re: Redding Neck sizer die issue - anyone seen this?

    I concur with Rafael.

    After much research and trial & error, I have found the use of the correct size bushing & CARBIDE EXPANDER BALL (not the one that ships with the die) is the ticket.
    By using the Redding carbide expander ball you do not have to worry about lube on the necks and it is free floating so that it is always perfectly centered.

    Doc76251 raised an excellent point in his "How To" Thread that is a sticky in the reloading section.
    He states that by using the bushing die you only push the flaws and imperfections to the inside of the case neck.
    I have found that by using the carbide ball with the bushing dies you are able to eliminate that issue.
    It is also my personal opinion that this meathod also serves to uniform the necks.
     
    Re: Redding Neck sizer die issue - anyone seen this?

    I use the FL S die in 308 also. With the expander ball I always felt like I was over working my brass. But when I didn't use it I wondered how the dings and flat spots on the case mouth were going to get straightened out. This subject came up at the F-Class nationals in Sacramento a few years ago. Got a tip from a member of the US Plama team. He told me to use a .003 under bushing and take the expander ball and turn it down until I feel it just brush the inside of the neck. It has been a a while since I did this so I can't remeber how many thousands we machined off. I have had excellant resulsts with this setup. Gave me consistant neck tension.
     
    Re: Redding Neck sizer die issue - anyone seen this?

    <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: 264shooter</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I use the FL S die in 308 also. With the expander ball I always felt like I was over working my brass. But when I didn't use it I wondered how the dings and flat spots on the case mouth were going to get straightened out. This subject came up at the F-Class nationals in Sacramento a few years ago. Got a tip from a member of the US Plama team. He told me to use a .003 under bushing and take the expander ball and turn it down until I feel it just brush the inside of the neck. It has been a a while since I did this so I can't remeber how many thousands we machined off. I have had excellant resulsts with this setup. Gave me consistant neck tension. </div></div>

    I assume that would only work if you use the same brand of brass each time, right?
     
    Re: Redding Neck sizer die issue - anyone seen this?

    264 Shooter, I think if you changed bushings to match the neck thickness, your expander ball should remain the same since you are shooting (!) for .003 tension no matter what the thickness of thr brass neck might be.. JMHO
     
    Re: Redding Neck sizer die issue - anyone seen this?

    The flat spots in the case mouth is my main concern for this setup. This rifle gets some pretty rough duty and the brass gets beat up. It works for me.<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: former naval person</div><div class="ubbcode-body">264 Shooter, I think if you changed bushings to match the neck thickness, your expander ball should remain the same since you are shooting (!) for .003 tension no matter what the thickness of thr brass neck might be.. JMHO </div></div>
     
    Re: Redding Neck sizer die issue - anyone seen this?

    <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Rafael</div><div class="ubbcode-body">JLM;
    Runout stayed about the same.... but seating force, which I equate to neck tension, became more consistent. </div></div>

    Interesting, I shall try that. Carbide ball?

    You don't anneal your Lapua at all do you? I can see where NT might get flaky after than many reloads. But man the brass sure LASTS don't it
    smile.gif
     
    Re: Redding Neck sizer die issue - anyone seen this?

    <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: 264shooter</div><div class="ubbcode-body">The flat spots in the case mouth is my main concern for this setup. This rifle gets some pretty rough duty and the brass gets beat up. It works for me. </div></div>

    What are the flat spots from, out of curiosity? Gas gun?
     
    Re: Redding Neck sizer die issue - anyone seen this?

    I have been meaning to try the carbide-ball, am using the standard expander currently.

    No, I don't anneal so far but am interested in it.
    My latest batch of 500 Lapua cases is only on it's 4th firing, but I notice more consistent seating pressure from case to case when I use the expander.

    ReaperDriver;
    I hope you don't mind the side discussion. None of us intend to interrupt your thread but your circumstances are somewhat related given we are all working with the same dies.
     
    Re: Redding Neck sizer die issue - anyone seen this?

    The flat spots in the case mouth come rapid bolt operation, brass landing on the gruond bouncing off rocks and concrete. Getting stepped on when I transition from target to target. Just rough use in competition.
     
    Re: Redding Neck sizer die issue - anyone seen this?

    <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Rafael</div><div class="ubbcode-body">
    ReaperDriver;
    I hope you don't mind the side discussion. None of us intend to interrupt your thread but your circumstances are somewhat related given we are all working with the same dies. </div></div>

    No worries at all. I always learn something from the different threads going.
     
    Re: Redding Neck sizer die issue - anyone seen this?

    <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: 264shooter</div><div class="ubbcode-body">The flat spots in the case mouth come rapid bolt operation, brass landing on the gruond bouncing off rocks and concrete. Getting stepped on when I transition from target to target. Just rough use in competition. </div></div>

    gotcha!
     
    Re: Redding Neck sizer die issue - anyone seen thi

    <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Rafael</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I have been meaning to try the carbide-ball, am using the standard expander currently.

    ReaperDriver;
    I hope you don't mind the side discussion. None of us intend to interrupt your thread but your circumstances are somewhat related given we are all working with the same dies. </div></div>
    I'll add to the dissension. I almost jumped in earlier on the discussion of using an expander. I saw a posting sometime back in which someone was using the carbide expander, mainly because it's a <span style="font-style: italic">floating</span> design. He was undersizing his necks by 0.001" and then using the expander to <span style="font-style: italic">uniform</span> them, <span style="font-style: italic">moving the imperfections to the exterior</span>.
     
    Re: Redding Neck sizer die issue - anyone seen this?

    This might sound stupid, but how the hell do you get the size button off? I can't twist that sucker off by hand. I've thought about using pliers but don't want to mess up the size button or the rod it is screwed onto.
     
    Re: Redding Neck sizer die issue - anyone seen this?

    <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Falar</div><div class="ubbcode-body">This might sound stupid, but how the hell do you get the size button off? I can't twist that sucker off by hand. I've thought about using pliers but don't want to mess up the size button or the rod it is screwed onto. </div></div>

    I used pliers with a piece of leather. It really just took a bare bit a pressure with the pliers to get it to turn. Don't sweat it.
     
    Re: Redding Neck sizer die issue - anyone seen thi

    <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Rafael</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Has anyone ever done a runout comparison between the two types of expanders? I would think that both "could" work against you in the right circumstances. </div></div>
    Don't just leave us hanging.
    confused.gif

    I'd really like to hear your thinking on "work against"; any new scenarios?

    <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Rafael</div><div class="ubbcode-body">...I notice more consistent seating pressure from case to case when I use the expander.</div></div>
    Would you correlate the consistent pressure to the<span style="font-style: italic"> imperfections having been forced to the exterior</span> of the case neck? Thoughts on other causes.

    Thanks for sharing.
     
    Re: Redding Neck sizer die issue - anyone seen thi

    <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">If the correct bushing has been selected, the size
    button
    will just barely touch the inside of the case neck when it is withdrawn.
    For most reloaders</div></div>

    Isn't their idea of the correct bushing .001 under loaded round diameter thou? Seems like most guys here go at least .002 or even .003. I'm running a .335 with Lapua for instance, which is right around .003 smaller than loaded neck diameter.

    I tried just ONE case (sample size WAY to small lol) with the ball and it certainly doesn't just 'kiss' the inside with the .335.

     
    Re: Redding Neck sizer die issue - anyone seen thi

    <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Winchester 69</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Rafael</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Has anyone ever done a runout comparison between the two types of expanders? I would think that both "could" work against you in the right circumstances. </div></div>
    Don't just leave us hanging.
    confused.gif

    I'd really like to hear your thinking on "work against"; any new scenarios?

    <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Rafael</div><div class="ubbcode-body">...I notice more consistent seating pressure from case to case when I use the expander.</div></div>
    Would you correlate the consistent pressure to the<span style="font-style: italic"> imperfections having been forced to the exterior</span> of the case neck? Thoughts on other causes.

    Thanks for sharing. </div></div>

    Sorry, man.
    laugh.gif
    Do remember though...... I am theorizing here.
    I was thinking that the standard expander might help create a straighter neck since it has a longer bearing surface and will force variances to conform to the rest of the I.D as it pulls through.
    This means I am suggesting the ball can wobble around on its way out of the neck following the path of least resistance which can vary based on neck wall inconsistencies and the like. This "could" mean more seated runout using the ball.

    On the other side of the argument, the balls short bearing surface should certaily result in less drag and possibly less shoulder distortion like the OP experienced.

    As to my perceived seating pressure consistency increase.......
    Your statement of inconsistencies being forced to the outside sounds reasonable.
    The term "inconsistencies" should include both variances within a single case AND case-to-case neck thickness variation. The latter was my main reason for trying it.

    I doubt these are new thoughts to most of you.
     
    Re: Redding Neck sizer die issue - anyone seen thi

    <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: JLM</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">If the correct bushing has been selected, the size
    button
    will just barely touch the inside of the case neck when it is withdrawn.
    For most reloaders</div></div>

    Isn't their idea of the correct bushing .001 under loaded round diameter thou? Seems like most guys here go at least .002 or even .003. I'm running a .335 with Lapua for instance, which is right around .003 smaller than loaded neck diameter.

    I tried just ONE case (sample size WAY to small lol) with the ball and it certainly doesn't just 'kiss' the inside with the .335.

    </div></div>
    Same here.... I tried to run the expander ball through a case sized to .336 and it would not even enter the case mouth.
     
    Re: Redding Neck sizer die issue - anyone seen thi

    All expanders have to go through an already sized neck.
    Whether you are using a full lenght or bushing die, the sizing button or ball enters the case first.
    Then the neck is sized and the button / ball always has to come back up through the neck on the down stroke.

    This shouldn't be on any significance because the button or ball is intended to be the same diameter as the projectile.
    If it is, the neck tension should be damn near perfect.
     
    Re: Redding Neck sizer die issue - anyone seen thi

    <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Winchester 69</div><div class="ubbcode-body">As I read the original post, the case had been sized with a bushing only, and the neck was smaller than the button. </div></div>

    Yes. I just went out and remeasured the button with a set of good digital calipers and the button diameter comes out to .3075. I was using fairly thick wall neck cases (FC) and after neck-sizing them down based on the recommendations both from Redding and here (bushing .001 to .003 smaller than a loaded round) - the button was really yanking on the necks from the inside on its way out on the downstroke. That is what caused the shoulders to end up being stretched causing the rounds not to chamber.

    I since pulled all those bullets and ran all that brass back through the body die and then again through the neck die and reloaded all the bullets. I shot them today and they all did great. I also ran a whole new set of brass through using only the decapping pin retainer, rather than the neck expander ball and they all worked perfectly fine. There were even a few with some dented mouths that the neck bushing put back into round quite nicely without the expander button present.