Rittenhouse trial: Jury ends third day of deliberations without a verdict

[Animal357]

Rittenhouse trial: Jury ends third day of deliberations without a verdict: LIVE UPDATES

Jurors in the Kyle Rittenhouse trial have resumed deliberations Thursday.

www.foxnews.com

This is a slam dunk for an acquittal. The fact that deliberations are even going on is a bad sign. WTF is wrong with these jurors??

Why did the judge not end the case once the "victim" admitted that he point a gun at Rittenhouse?

 

[Desert_Racer]

There is nothing to deliberate on. Unless, of course, the jury is full of cowards who would rather burn a now 18 year old kid in order to save their own skin from the mob.

 

[Texascbr]

My prediction as a lawyer who did criminal defense work in a past life to include a televised trial. I suspect we will get a verdict tomorrow so everyone can be done with this before the weekend. Even in a slam dunk case the jury does not want to rush out with a verdict and give the appearance that they did not give proceedings proper consideration.

Of course if i was on the panel and returning with a not guilty, I might consider waiting till Monday so not to give a charge going into a weekend where more people may decided to go out and riot.

 

[_Windrider_]

My prediction as a lawyer who did criminal defense work in a past life to include a televised trial. I suspect we will get a verdict tomorrow so everyone can be done with this before the weekend. Even in a slam dunk case the jury does not want to rush out with a verdict and give the appearance that they did not give proceedings proper consideration.

Of course if i was on the panel and returning with a not guilty, I might consider waiting till Monday so not to give a charge going into a weekend where more people may decided to go out and riot.

My guess. Hung jury.

 

[candyx]

My prediction as a lawyer who did criminal defense work in a past life to include a televised trial. I suspect we will get a verdict tomorrow so everyone can be done with this before the weekend. Even in a slam dunk case the jury does not want to rush out with a verdict and give the appearance that they did not give proceedings proper consideration.

Of course if i was on the panel and returning with a not guilty, I might consider waiting till Monday so not to give a charge going into a weekend where more people may decided to go out and riot.

Sat on a jury for a gun related case for a couple of days, when we hit the jury room within 10 seconds who's for guilty on the one charge and not guilty on the other. Fives minutes elapse time the most, everyone just wanted to go home.

 

[diverdon]

My prediction as a lawyer who did criminal defense work in a past life to include a televised trial. I suspect we will get a verdict tomorrow so everyone can be done with this before the weekend. Even in a slam dunk case the jury does not want to rush out with a verdict and give the appearance that they did not give proceedings proper consideration.

Of course if i was on the panel and returning with a not guilty, I might consider waiting till Monday so not to give a charge going into a weekend where more people may decided to go out and riot.

In the televised trial you were involved in did the prosecution use a rifle to threaten the jury? Were the jurors in that trial made to know that if they returned the wrong verdict their neighborhood would burn?

If they acquit I'll be proud of them. If I was on the jury ide have my wife and kids in another state living under another name. I'll be impressed if they aquit.