There's a chart someone posted. I think that number is much higher, like 99.6....and some change.
-
Having trouble using the site?
Contact support
ROE VS WADE OVERTURNED!!!!!!
- Thread starter 7.62willdo
- Start date
Sir, with respect, would you really want your daughter to give birth to that child? Irrespective of the potential birth defects given by incest. That is sooooo traumatic to the mother.
I DO NOT condone abortion. My post is for discussion regarding the absurdity of abortion in 2022, as well as how we are being given a bullshit bill of goods by men and women who will RULE our lives by the Bullshit decisions they make on the HIGHEST COURT OF THE LAND. Say what you will, but those fuckers flat out lied. I don’t care which WAY THEY LIED, only that the men and women who are entrusted with rulings effecting us each and every day, gave bullshit testimony in front of you, me and all of America.
Integrity is paramount! Anything you have can be taken from you. Your wealth, your health, your land, your possessions.
Your integrity YOU have to GIVE. No one can take that. Those two fuckers on the court gave it up to hen they stated that they were good with ROE V WADE. Don’t give a fuck about roe or wade….but seriously worried about the Supreme Court integrity and what it means for me down the line.
So……Mr God Almighty, apparently you have Devine knowledge of when life begins …..pls extol your vast knowledge upon the rest of us peons and explain IN LEGAL TERMS ACCEPTED BY THE REST OF SOCIETY when life begins. In the womb? When the sperm meets the egg? When the fetus can sustain itself? 2 weeks? First trimester? Second trimester? We will then conform , all of us in the United States, to your ruling. If you get it wrong, sucks to be you. But you can explain that I’m sure sure with your superior knowledge and deity to the man above.
No jurisdiction in the country offers the death penalty for incest, and only the UCMJ offers the death penalty for rape. That punishment hasn't been used since WWII, and likely wouldn't survive a modern legal challenge.
So if we're not killing people who commit those crimes, why kill innocent third parties to the crime?
How far do we take it? Can a rape victim kill a co-worker who uses the same cologne as her attacker? Smell is the strongest emotional trigger.
It's not like rape victims are over the ordeal in 9 months. For most, it is a life changing event, and a delineation point on their lives.
Killing a child would only add to their emotional damage unless they are a sociopath/psychopath.
You asked for a legal source, he immediately cited it, and you think you're winning???
Leftys should pay royalties to Morris Albert for creating an entire ideology from the first five words of his biggest song.
Exactly. If someone murder a preggo woman and she had a fertilized embryo ... they would get charged for both murders.
Fucking retard! The decision was NOT ABOUT LIFE INCEPTION. It was bout rights. Since you like to quote constitutional law. Show me where in the constitution it specifically says RIGHT TO ABORTION.
Calling yourself a retard isn't a good look bro ... just take the L
- Nov 3, 2010
- 9,702
- 20,404
- Nov 3, 2010
- 9,702
- 20,404
- Nov 3, 2010
- 9,702
- 20,404
Show me a 4 month old ,or a 4 year old, that can sustain itself, truly independently. Heck I work with plenty of 40 year olds who would be dead in two weeks in the wild in summer. If viability is the acid test, why would taking their lives be immoral? Why can’t I make omelets out of bald eagle or sea turtle eggs? They can’t fly or swim, can’t eat or hunt. Same clump of cells early on. All of us in THESE UNITED STATES protect these ANIMALS by FEDERAL law. No such federal law exists for unborn humans. Splain that one to me.
The answer for me is all of these things: the eagle, the turtle, the baby, will grow to maturity given time and PROPER CARE.
Non viable pregnancy, sure, life saving surgery or medical treatment for mom, sure; it’s just not the right time for me, sorry that’s just wrong.
Last edited:
- Nov 3, 2010
- 9,702
- 20,404
Are you sure dumbass? I think you need to brush up on your reading comprehension bud
Little week bro. Says All persons BORN or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside
- Nov 3, 2010
- 9,702
- 20,404
Ok....I have an admission to make.
I absolutely believe, that a woman should have a right to kill her unborn child.
In the event she wants to abort her child, they should have a lottery. All parties involved should have their names put in a hat, mother, father, doctor, nurses, oh and the star of the show, the baby.
Whoever has their name picked out of the hat, dies by the same means they would use on baby.
I absolutely believe, that a woman should have a right to kill her unborn child.
In the event she wants to abort her child, they should have a lottery. All parties involved should have their names put in a hat, mother, father, doctor, nurses, oh and the star of the show, the baby.
Whoever has their name picked out of the hat, dies by the same means they would use on baby.
first off, you don't know how the questions or sample was compiled. Last poll I saw out of quinnipiac said a majority, including dems, wanted to restrict abortion after a certain time period. we can all find polls.
no luck needed, let the states decide
Same brah! If you are gonna quote law, ya gotta get it right…. The amendment says BORN. WE TALKING SHIT STILL IN THE WOMB YO
Come on brah…. You da one quoted constitution…. Bring more than thatdis you bro?
If most people support abortion, why are leftys butt hurt over letting the states decide?
Can't be a lefty w/o being a hypocrite.
nuke the whales.
step 2: stop paying single mothers to have more kids. no more welfare babies.
So much this.
If I put an ad in the local paper saying I'd pay $1,000/week to cut my lawn, my phone would blow up with people wanting that deal.
When government advertises it will pay welfare whores to raise bastard kids in fatherless homes, people sign up.
US Gov’t TOTALLY fucked the first two. No question. Last one…. You make the call. Not saying right or wrong… jus sayin I ain’t judgin on the last.
when i lived in the hood, one of my neighbors was already taking care of one of her sister's kids when she took in another one.
she told me her sister keep having kids and claiming them for benefits, but she won't take care of them.
being their aunt, she didn't have the heart to turn them away or let the state take them and give them to sex traffickers or something.
No democrats did it to all three.
The biggest political lie is the parties switched.
Antebellum democrats used the government to force people to pick their crops and said slaves didn't really count as people, so it was legal to kill them.
Modern democrats use government to force people to pay for their health-care,welfare, and other freebies, and say unborn babies don't really count as people,so it's legal to kill them.
Nothing has changed, democrats have ALWAYS lived at the expense of others.
So ill see you Monday
in honor of the most infamous defender of the "right" to murder children and one of the most influential haters of the US Constitution
Ya might wanted take a look at the job ,BEFORE committing . I made that mistake once with my combine........corn ,full of morning glories is a nightmare. Needless to say,I've never not looked at a crop before I committed myself since.
Dats mah auntee y’all. Donts be dissing mah aunteeeee. She done do raistid me yo!
Ahh, the elusive auntie of the American ghettos.
Excellent analysis by James Pinkerton. Him and Nolte at Breitbart are two of the best journalistic minds out there right now. Journalism as it should be.
www.breitbart.com
Worth the read.
Sirhr
Pinkerton: The Supreme Court Confirmed That the Constitution’s Solution for Abortion Is Federalism
The Supreme Court’s Dobbs decision is both smaller than it looks and bigger than it looks. But its underlying solution to the abortion debate is huge.
www.breitbart.com
Worth the read.
Sirhr
Similar threads
