The rear integral base for my Ruger M77 MkII is too narrow for some rings to be able to tighten on it. Rings that can't tighten on the rear work fine on the front integral base. The difference in width of the integrals bases is big enough for the eye to detect (after buying it of course). Any ideas (besides sell the gun)?
The rear Ruger-supplied ring that came with the gun when new is just a bit too loose to tighten properly ... it seems tight, but if you really twist on it (or fire the gun ... it's a 300 Win Mag) it will move. Some Burris I tried next didn't fit at all (10 years ago), but Redfields did, and being "high" ones they work fine with the 4.5-14x40mm I had on it. Now I'm switching to a 1.5-5x, along with a new stock (had the skeleton stock before), and wanted to use low mounts. Redfield doesn't make rings now that Leupold owns that name. The new Leupold low mounts I just bought are WAY too loose on the rear integral base, the ring just rattles around when tightened all the way. Any ideas for other rings, or a clever way to still use the Leupold ones?
The rear Ruger-supplied ring that came with the gun when new is just a bit too loose to tighten properly ... it seems tight, but if you really twist on it (or fire the gun ... it's a 300 Win Mag) it will move. Some Burris I tried next didn't fit at all (10 years ago), but Redfields did, and being "high" ones they work fine with the 4.5-14x40mm I had on it. Now I'm switching to a 1.5-5x, along with a new stock (had the skeleton stock before), and wanted to use low mounts. Redfield doesn't make rings now that Leupold owns that name. The new Leupold low mounts I just bought are WAY too loose on the rear integral base, the ring just rattles around when tightened all the way. Any ideas for other rings, or a clever way to still use the Leupold ones?