Looking to get a suppressor for my 300wsm and 308. Some use on a 556 during pig hunts. Can anyone really break out the difference between the dead air nomad and sandman for me. Don’t see much from their website.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I've heard some good things about the EA Vox S. I'm kind of in the same boat and debating between Vox S and Nomad. Mostly to be mounted on 12.5" 6.5 Grendel or 8.5" 300 Blk.I was leaning towards the Nomad. I like the direct thread and keymod options. Anyone have other recommendations. My only experience is with the Surefire issued cans.
Sandman comes standard with Keymo mount and built like a tank for around the same pricepoint. Why ever go Nomad?
Ive got a sandman l. from my understanding a few of the differences are the materials they used and the dimensions. sandman is smaller in diameter. and the sandman series is built full auto rated. whatever you can throw at it itll take. the nomad on the other hand cant take the heat. its not full auto rated. great thing about these cans is if you are ok with their muzzle devices, one suppressor can work for all your rifles 300wm down to 556. and even if youre not ok with their muzzle devices other companies like son of liberty make compatible hider/brakes. When I shoot subs out of my Rem CSR with the sandman its movie quiet. If you search hard enough on youtube you can find videos of people shooting each to get a better idea of what "tone" they are. I would say my sandman has more of a mid range sound to it, with less or a high frequency pop. Thats all i got. Hope it helps.
Uh no...I have personally melted down a nomad in a destruction test... it's full auto rated I can assure you.
The difference as you pointed out, is the build materials and it's intended purpose.
The sandman series is meant to be able to live on a full auto SBR*. There is a big difference between a SBR and a full length rifle in terms of what the baffles need to be made out of in order to survive and function
I see what youre saying. but not everyone on the interwebs agree with you. some people state that the rating is different between the two.
Right off deadairs website it says the nomad has no barrel length restrictions.
You are right tho different materials for different intended purposes.
I honestly dont know, I can only repeat what other people have said in reviews. but you melting down a suppressor isnt a strong argument that its full auto rated.
.....the nomad cant take the heat that the sandman can.... bud. difference in materials.
Ive actually talked to dead air about this very topic and have done my best to communicate what they told me. I just emailed them in hopes to get something in writing from them and will post when I hear back. other than that I have zero desire to continue this back and forth with you. Good day sir.
Because Key-Mo is heavy and long and regular DA muzzle devices are also heavy themselves, leading to a mount/adapter weight penalty of a little over 8 oz. I could run Key-Mo on my Nomad, but it's just too heavy and bulky, not the best option out there for most uses IMO.
With the Nomad you get a shorter, lighter, quieter suppressor that can run direct thread, or a number of other QD or TOMB systems, most of which are fairly light/short, including Plan A, Plan B, YHM Kurtz, Area 419, Centrix, Xenomorph (soon), etc. Also if you do have a bunch of DA muzzle devices and don't mind the weight/handling impact, Key-Mo is still an option.
I honestly don't see any reason to go with a Sandman these days unless your main use is hammering rounds through MGs or SBRs as fast as you can.
These days for bolt gun use and slow fire AR, I'd probably go with the Nomad Ti. It's the same length/performance as a Nomad 30, but only weighs 9.6 oz in DT, which in comparison, is only about an oz heavier than a Key-Mo/brake combo by itself.
If it wasnt such a hassle I would consider trading off my Sandman for a Nomad Ti after looking further into it. Live and learn
If it wasn't such a hassle I would consider trading my Nomad 30 off for the Ti, but it is what it is. For the kind of shooting I do the difference in toughness really doesn't matter, mostly hunting/LR bolt gun and slow fire AR, my cans never get up to the ~800 deg level where Ti has problems.
As it is, I think I might just add a Nomad Ti to the top of the stack, it's not considered an addiction until you edge past 1 on your cans to hosts ratio right?
Sorry I missed this. I guess I need to turn on notifications or something. I've had my head down working on our new taper mount, and times are just crazy busy in general.
Here's my take on it all from the designer and how we positioned the Nomad and Sandman in the lineup:
For full auto, continuous, heavy shooting, there's just nothing that beats the Sandman. The KeyMount mounting system is welded into it and it doesn't come loose on the muzzle device when shooting. The stellite baffles handle erosion better than any other material out there. It also comes off when you want. It's known for very low backpressure and is very "friendly" for DI guns in that it allows for easy set up to get them hearing safe at the ejection port (i.e. changing out buffer weight, gas block adjustment, A5 buffer system, etc.). Many suppressors will require all of the above mods, where the Sandman-S or especially the -K may just require one of the above. That all depends on many factors, hence the term that it's "friendly" for hearing safe setup. The rifle is usually dialed in pretty quickly.
The Nomad will still take full auto fire and even sustained hard use. Heat is only the enemy in terms of baffle erosion. The 17-4 stainless is crazy strong, but will begin to wear before stellite will at those high temps. Note that it takes sustained high temps and firing schedules to see this, though. If you get a suppressor glowing red hot every time you're out shooting, then the Sandman is for you. I've ran many Nomads in full auto tests I can tell you that a few mag dump sessions of 4-6 straight mags of full auto use will begin to impinge the face of the blast baffle and you'll see roughness along the bore-line--but no increase in diameter of the bore due to wear. Otherwise, the Nomad will offer you more options. If you have a favorite mount on all of your rifles, then it let's you still run with that if the manufacturer provides an adapter for it.
It's also quieter than the Sandman-S and is lighter. It has a super efficient baffle stack that is not a standard cone design. It redirects gas into secondary chambers and it also allows that gas to return back across the bore-line to impede reverse flow back down the bore. The net effect is backpressure that is on par with the Sandman-S (which is awesome as mentioned above), while still being efficient at the muzzle. Many suppressors that are super efficient at the muzzle will massively drive up backpressure (i.e. the Omega 300). You'll also find that the Nomad works incredibly well on subsonic ammo and shines even more as the pressure goes up with supersonic cartridges.
The Nomad's baffle structure is like a lattice bridge where it directs the forces to reinforced points. The welded joints you see between the baffle sections are super thick and that's where all the hoop stress is diverted. That's why it has a higher caliber rating than the Sandman series (300 Norma Mag).
I hope that helps answer some questions!
Todd Magee
Dead Air Engineering
I've had my head down working on our new taper mount, and times are just crazy busy in general.
Do tell us more about this, please!
Sorry I missed this. I guess I need to turn on notifications or something. I've had my head down working on our new taper mount, and times are just crazy busy in general.
Here's my take on it all from the designer and how we positioned the Nomad and Sandman in the lineup:
For full auto, continuous, heavy shooting, there's just nothing that beats the Sandman. The KeyMount mounting system is welded into it and it doesn't come loose on the muzzle device when shooting. The stellite baffles handle erosion better than any other material out there. It also comes off when you want. It's known for very low backpressure and is very "friendly" for DI guns in that it allows for easy set up to get them hearing safe at the ejection port (i.e. changing out buffer weight, gas block adjustment, A5 buffer system, etc.). Many suppressors will require all of the above mods, where the Sandman-S or especially the -K may just require one of the above. That all depends on many factors, hence the term that it's "friendly" for hearing safe setup. The rifle is usually dialed in pretty quickly.
The Nomad will still take full auto fire and even sustained hard use. Heat is only the enemy in terms of baffle erosion. The 17-4 stainless is crazy strong, but will begin to wear before stellite will at those high temps. Note that it takes sustained high temps and firing schedules to see this, though. If you get a suppressor glowing red hot every time you're out shooting, then the Sandman is for you. I've ran many Nomads in full auto tests I can tell you that a few mag dump sessions of 4-6 straight mags of full auto use will begin to impinge the face of the blast baffle and you'll see roughness along the bore-line--but no increase in diameter of the bore due to wear. Otherwise, the Nomad will offer you more options. If you have a favorite mount on all of your rifles, then it let's you still run with that if the manufacturer provides an adapter for it.
It's also quieter than the Sandman-S and is lighter. It has a super efficient baffle stack that is not a standard cone design. It redirects gas into secondary chambers and it also allows that gas to return back across the bore-line to impede reverse flow back down the bore. The net effect is backpressure that is on par with the Sandman-S (which is awesome as mentioned above), while still being efficient at the muzzle. Many suppressors that are super efficient at the muzzle will massively drive up backpressure (i.e. the Omega 300). You'll also find that the Nomad works incredibly well on subsonic ammo and shines even more as the pressure goes up with supersonic cartridges.
The Nomad's baffle structure is like a lattice bridge where it directs the forces to reinforced points. The welded joints you see between the baffle sections are super thick and that's where all the hoop stress is diverted. That's why it has a higher caliber rating than the Sandman series (300 Norma Mag).
I hope that helps answer some questions!
Todd Magee
Dead Air Engineering
I went Nomad-L plus EBrake for better sound suppression and recoil and muzzle rise reduction. It’s a beast. Long and heavy. The Nomad Ti sure was sexy but I went with big Bertha.
These are the cans i'm considering as well. Am leaning more towards Ti. Is the Nomad TI "louder" than the Nomad-L? Apologies for the noob question
Yes, the Nomad Ti is there same length as the Nomad 30, and meters very similarly:
The Nomad L is longer, heavier and quieter than the Nomad 30 or Nomad Ti.
Db is not everything in a can, it helps, don't get me wrong. If the Ti is something you are interested in for a specific purpose, like hunting, then get it. Should still wear hearing protection even with cans, cans are still not exactly hearing safe. You can just get away with a lesser NRR rating.
As long as you buy a quality can (TBAC, Dead Air or Silencer Co) you shouldn't have any bad experience with either a medium sized can or a long can. Only length that you will probably not be happy, and would not get as a first time buyer is what are sometimes referred to as K cans. Such as the Sandman K, or a TBAC Ultra 5. These are short cans, that help knock down some of the noise, but is still unpleasant to hear. I do not own one, and IMO, it is for people that have all the other cans they could want and want something to make a small package.
Thanks for the input and I concur with your statement that while cans help in reducing decibels, ear protection is vital as well. That being said, as an average hunter who does not own sbr or auto rifles (at this time), i'm researching/looking for something that meets my current needs and I think the Ti may be the "perfect fit" as it is light and I will strictly use it only for semi-auto and hunting rifles.
The Nomad 30 is a nice size/performance combo for those uses, and I like mine. Buying now I'd go with the Ti as it has the length and performance of the original Nomad with a 30% weight reduction... Definitely a plus for anything you are hanging on your muzzle and toting around, possibly swinging and shooting unsupported.
Yes. Can Cerakote just about anything. But naked Ti is sexy when it gets hot and starts to turn colors.