Re: Savage receiver FIXED - need to remove barrel
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: turbo54</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: okrebel92</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I think my favorite quote applys here nicely--- "The absence of evidence is not the evidence absence" -Carl Sagen
OP, think of that one a bit before you pop off with a "your wrong" rant. Just because you cant see the damage, doesn't mean it's not there. A good comparison to what you did is when your doing fence work and forget wire cutters and you have to cut bailing wire or barb wire. (Some of city folks may have no clue what i'm talking about.
) You bend the wire back and forth repeatedly until it gets hot and "work hards" and it breaks. Basicly, when you bend or warp metal back and forth, it's changing the structure and strength of the metal on a molecular level. Granted, you didn't bend it back and forth repeaditly, but when your dealing with pressures 30,000 times the pressure of psig, it amplifies the effects of the weakend metal 1000 times
more. just my .02 backed up with facts.
I see a come to jesus meeting with darwin coming soon. LMAO! </div></div>
Facts? 30,000 times "psig" (which I can only assume you mean gage pressure, which is
basically 14.5 psia) is 435,000 psi, which is clearly incorrect. I don't like assuming meanings, but what else can I do? We all know 308 winchester pressures are WELL in excess of 30,000 psig OR 30,000 psia.
Is it also a fact the issue is amplified "1000 times"? Is that a linear relationship? A constant? Inverse? Exponential? Sorry dude, but you can't just pull a number out of your @$$ and call it a fact. As we say where I come from: that dog don't hunt. If im wrong, produce some quantifiable data and references.
As a professional engineer (yes, I have my PE), it REALLY irks me how so many of you are pontificating and prostletizing such ridiculous anecdotal and WRONG information. I am impartial. Look back at the other thread where I stated that for $200, he should just buy a new action. Its very difficult to bend metal, then straighten it back to where it originally was. He made a stupid mistake. I WILL call out anyone in this forum for misinformation and not understanding engineering principles - particularly when they are making
claims of an engineering type. </div></div>
I meant to say MORE than 30,000 psig (there's your fact 1 so I'm not pulling it out of my ass) As far as a relationship between the two numbers that I threw out there, it's not an inverse proportion (duh!) I doubt it would be a linear relationship due to the amount of variables and no constants. I would say it would be closer to an exponential relationship if it were to be any "set type" of relationship. In no way am I trying to "pontificate or proselytize <span style="font-size: 8pt">(<-correct spelling)</span> ridiculous anecdotal and WRONG information." I have my degree in Thermodynamic controls and applications, and I also deal with pressure readings every day. Just because you are a PE doesn't mean you're an expert or the only one with an advanced degree. What I said about the metals properties changing under stress and heat is a FACT and you know it. Are you disagreeing that the the integrity of the receiver is not more dangerous at 30,000psi vs. 14.5psi based on what he has done?? I ball-parked an estimate of 1000 based on what I have experienced in my field and what metal tends to do at different temps and pressures. Furthermore, I'm not trying to get in a pissing match with you, but you sure as hell come across as another stuck-up engineer who seems to think that he knows everything just because he's a "PE".....
And one more thing, define "making claims of an engineering type"... I'd love to hear that one.