Oh yeah, there's also the more recent issue of them not replacing barrel reamers frequently enough and many 6.5 Creedmoor barrels having short chambers that won't properly chamber Hornady factory ammo...experienced that one myself.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Oh yeah, there's also the more recent issue of them not replacing barrel reamers frequently enough and many 6.5 Creedmoor barrels having short chambers that won't properly chamber Hornady factory ammo...experienced that one myself.
But for all of savages quirks, they are still a company while Remington is nothing now
But for all of savages quirks, they are still a company while Remington is nothing now
I'll never forget nearly breaking a tooth when keeping my head on the stock and ejecting a case in a K31. I had crept up on the stock without realizing it. Wouldn't be an issue running a modern chassis with cheek rest but in general with the straight pull rifles I've played with there is no gently ejecting a spent case. You pull until you overcome the force needed to unlock the bolt and then it's moving 100 mph until it hits the bolt stop. Maybe this one is smoother/softer. It definitely has some neat features and I'm excited to see how they work out.
Possible victim at 0:15:
Turns out the Axis rifles at least shoot decently, even if they still feel/operate like a cheap rifle. The Remington 783's that tried to compete with Savage shot worse than any other rifle's I've tried, including cheap AR's.But for all of savages quirks, they are still a company while Remington is nothing now
I like how the first advantage he lists is that you can keep your head on the stock and eyes through the scope, and then proceeds to do neither for the next 3 minutes.Kind of hard to tell if the action is stiff from being new, or just naturally a stiff design. It sure seems like that guy had to really pull on it. Hmmm....
Maybe he meant 3 MOA haha. Definitely need video evidence of thatI like how the first advantage he lists is that you can keep your head on the stock and eyes through the scope, and then proceeds to do neither for the next 3 minutes.
As to the 3 rounds on a 3" plate at 700 yards..
Video or it didn't happen.
I like how the first advantage he lists is that you can keep your head on the stock and eyes through the scope, and then proceeds to do neither for the next 3 minutes.
As to the 3 rounds on a 3" plate at 700 yards..
Video or it didn't happen.
3 MOA at 700 feet.Maybe he meant 3 MOA haha. Definitely need video evidence of that
And it’s fully ambidextrous. Bolt flips from right to left in seconds.
Post 50, 38 seconds in. You can also adjust the bolt angle.Is this true? I can't find more info on this? That would be awesome.
Is this true? I can't find more info on this? That would be awesome.
I hate the accutrigger. A piece of paperclip and a dot of silicon keeps mine pulled back, leaving a crisp trigger <1lb.
Straight pull action seems superfluous, but the barrel sleeve might be nice.
Now can it shoot like my K31Looks a lot like a Swiss K-31 design as well. Kind of a Heym-Swiss hybrid.
Hopefully (if they have half a brain between all the executives) they will retain the inlet and barrel dimensions already in use by the after market, to drive the sales of their rifle.
That being said, I still remember when their first long range rifle came out...with proprietary magazines. When asked (at SHOT) why they didn't use the common AICS mag, I got a dumbfounded, blank look. Smdh...
Haha I thought the same thing . Maybe he’s just to use to movement of a regular bolt action, but definitely actions didn’t line up with words. And off hand 3” @700yards? I don’t know him but I have a meter pegging at bs with that. (Unless video)I like how the first advantage he lists is that you can keep your head on the stock and eyes through the scope, and then proceeds to do neither for the next 3 minutes.
As to the 3 rounds on a 3" plate at 700 yards..
Video or it didn't happen.
Typically when you see that, it means they don't shoot multiple targets much (or movers).Haha I thought the same thing . Maybe he’s just to use to movement of a regular bolt action, but definitely actions didn’t line up with words. And off hand 3” @700yards? I don’t know him but I have a meter pegging at bs with that. (Unless video)
Is that how they make 300 Win Mag brass?In the immortal words of Fletch, “It’s all ball bearings nowadays.”
For those wondering about the safety factor of not having a bolt flying back into your face, check out this test—those dang ball bearings held at over 157k psi.
Heym SR30 bolt: 10,700 bar test
Sort of want. The follow up should be a precision rimfire.
Having shot a Fortner and regular turn bolt in an NRL comp, there’s no real discernible advantage to the straight pull
It would be a great option at less than half the cost of an Anschutz 1727 or 1827Now THIS I could get behind. Straight pull makes more sense in a rimfire. Should be a smoother pull due to not needing to overcome as much pressure to open bolt, and no risk of broken teeth.
Now THIS I could get behind. Straight pull makes more sense in a rimfire. Should be a smoother pull due to not needing to overcome as much pressure to open bolt, and no risk of broken teeth.
How well did the PWS/VQ Smmmit or Browning T bolt sell?Now THIS I could get behind. Straight pull makes more sense in a rimfire. Should be a smoother pull due to not needing to overcome as much pressure to open bolt, and no risk of broken teeth.
How well did the PWS/VQ Smmmit or Browning T bolt sell?
How well did the PWS/VQ Smmmit or Browning T bolt sell?
You're making my point. Two, recent made, US market, straight pull rimfire rifles that have not sold in enough quantity to gain traction.That. Is a valid question.
But how many Americans have ever purchased a straighr pull?
Outside of my pair of k31s I have never seen one in the wild.