Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I asked them a few days ago.Any chance this reticle might be making it to the 3-20x50 (not the ultra short)? Do we know which scopes this reticle will be available in besides the 5-25?
How nicely vague of S&B, but I'm not surprisedI asked them a few days ago.
“Thank you for your message. The Grid will be available from April on in our most popular scope 5-25x56. We haven´t made a final decision yet, which scope models will have the Grid reticle.”
Fun little interview from Shot Show 2019
At 30 seconds he explains why they put the grid over the main horizontal stadia, for multiple targets at different distances (he mentions 400, 600 and 800) you would dial for the 600y and hold over for 800y but hold under for 400y at least I think that is what he is saying. I don't shoot comps but I'm trying to wrap my head around why? If I'm not going to dial for each target, why not leave my scope at zero and hold over for all the other targets downrange? Seems like I'd get more confused with which target I dialed for and then all the others which I held for but maybe it is a better/quicker way.
That's me in the video. Let me try to explain. In a stressful situation like under the clock in a match, It is easy to get lost counting down the hold overs. So, if we dial the middle target then you have less distance from center to count making it easier and much faster. Ideally, you would still dial for every target if you can but that isn't always allowed or useful in short time stages.
I didn't know you were a Schmidt rep, that's good to know. When you say that it is much easier and faster to hold you're saying that moving the scope that extra mil or two if you didn't dial elevation is going to be harder and slower? Maybe I'm just not seeing it, a through the scope video showing how this would work would be helpful, I'm not saying you're wrong, I'm just trying to wrap my head around how having 2 mils of grid above the main horizontal stadia is truly going to make that much of a difference.
I didn't know you were a Schmidt rep, that's good to know. When you say that it is much easier and faster to hold you're saying that moving the scope that extra mil or two if you didn't dial elevation is going to be harder and slower? Maybe I'm just not seeing it, a through the scope video showing how this would work would be helpful, I'm not saying you're wrong, I'm just trying to wrap my head around how having 2 mils of grid above the main horizontal stadia is truly going to make that much of a difference.
That does help a lot, thank you for your patience with me. The stable vs. unstable positions also make a lot of sense, and then add stress due to time constraints, etc. and I can begin to see how this might benefit. Looking forward to more pics and vids as well. Now if only you could convince your German counterparts to put the reticle in the 3-27 and 3-20's, but to be honest I'm thrilled the 3-20 is going to get the MSR2 soon.In a match scenario it is easy to get lost counting down the tree. I've personally found myself counting my holds a few times to make sure it was correct. However, when you only have 2 mils or so to count from center, it's much easier and faster. You might also have to take in consideration the shooting position. From prone it's not too hard to count down, but the more unstable the position the harder it can be to stay focused on counting. I hope that helps.
Totally agree it’s a great idea and I love the reticle. Dial the middle target and hold under and over for the other ones.That's me in the video. Let me try to explain. In a stressful situation like under the clock in a match, It is easy to get lost counting down the hold overs. So, if we dial the middle target then you have less distance from center to count making it easier and much faster. Ideally, you would still dial for every target if you can but that isn't always allowed or useful in short time stages.
I completely understand the frustration. It will be April of this year, 2019. GRID reticles are on order and just need to come in and be assembled.Pardon the bluntness but April of what year. Their track record with product releases leaves much to be desired
At 30 seconds he explains why they put the grid over the main horizontal stadia, for multiple targets at different distances (he mentions 400, 600 and 800) you would dial for the 600y and hold over for 800y but hold under for 400y at least I think that is what he is saying. I don't shoot comps but I'm trying to wrap my head around why? If I'm not going to dial for each target, why not leave my scope at zero and hold over for all the other targets downrange? Seems like I'd get more confused with which target I dialed for and then all the others which I held for but maybe it is a better/quicker way.
Just to expound a little. Another reason to dial a middle target is if it’s a mover. It’s much easier to hit a mover when it’s at the center of your reticle than having to hold elevation and wind. So
static target: 300
Mover: 450
Static target: 650
It would be easier to hold under, hold center, hold over, in that scenario.
Reticle is only available in 5-25. That will be a hiccup for a lot of people with 3-27.
If true, I have no understanding of the thought process at S&B. I would never buy another 5-25 unless they correct the optical issues at the lower magnifications.
I love the two I have but it is price uncompetitive at $3.5K . You get what...a new reticle with the same optics and turrets. Their product management team needs to understand the landscape today.
I don't understand why they don't introduce it in a better optical design like the 3-27.
Just my 2 cents
I hear what you're saying Nik and completely agree, but that being said I bet they still sell a ton of them. As long as people keep buying the 5-25 Schmidt has no reason to revamp it, though I wish they would.If true, I have no understanding of the thought process at S&B. I would never buy another 5-25 unless they correct the optical issues at the lower magnifications.
I love the two I have but it is price uncompetitive at $3.5K . You get what...a new reticle with the same optics and turrets. Their product management team needs to understand the landscape today.
I don't understand why they don't introduce it in a better optical design like the 3-27.
Just my 2 cents
I hear what you're saying Nik and completely agree, but that being said I bet they still sell a ton of them. As long as people keep buying the 5-25 Schmidt has no reason to revamp it, though I wish they would.
David, any idea when the MSR2 reticles in the 3-20's and 3-27 will make it to our shores?
I hear what you're saying Nik and completely agree, but that being said I bet they still sell a ton of them. As long as people keep buying the 5-25 Schmidt has no reason to revamp it, though I wish they would.
David, any idea when the MSR2 reticles in the 3-20's and 3-27 will make it to our shores?
I can tell you that nothing beats the 5-25 PMII for an NRL .22 stick. I have the Gen IIXR reticle on that one and it is a hell of a combination.
I am considering selling my 5-25 with Gen2XR reticle for the new GRID scope. The new NF MilXT reticle in the 7-35 is also a contender.
@Nik H
That's funny. I have a NF 7-35 on my Vudoo .22 right now.
I can't get the S&B to work with the left handed action on my Vudoo. Smashing my hand into the illumination knob.
What I see happening long term is selling the NF and TT.
Running a S&B 3-27 MSR2 on the AI, a 5-20US MSR on SR25, and order a 3-20MSR2 without illumination for the Vudoo