Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Just wondering what would be considered the better scope.
Of course it’s subjective but I’m still interested in hearing various opinions.
Though the AMR reticle seems an improvement over the Horus family of reticles, I have been leery of Kahles scopes since I had catastrophic failures on two different Kahles-manufactured Swarovski scopes in the 90's (the STANAG mounts sheared off one scope that was used on a special receiver AUG and the other scope's reticle rotated within the tube). The 6 month round-trip to Austria to fix each scope wasn't pleasant.
Nothing in this life is perfect, but the PM II is close (laughing).
Kahles turn around time to Austria is about 4-5 weeks right now. Far cry from 6 months 15+ years ago.
My turn around time on the Schmidt and Bender was 2 days, not including the shipping back and forth.
My turn around time on the Schmidt and Bender was 2 days, not including the shipping back and forth.
WOW this looks like a great debate!
I have S&B, Premier, and the Kahles. I’m sure whatever one you get you will love. We have been getting great feedback on the Kahles 6-24x with the MSR and the AMR reticles.
I have tested the Kahles glass to the Premier, S&B and the Nightforce BEAST and the Kahles did just as good in my opinion. A common statement I get from guys that own both S&B and the Kahles “At times they feel the Kahles see better and at other times they feel the S&B sees better.”
![]()
Mike @ CSTACTICAL