I couldn't agree more on one aspect. The glass. Its close enough that the % it is of top tier doesn't matter in 99% of the shooting conditions. I was convinced it would eventually inhibit me substantially UNTIL last month when I shot in KS match. It literally rained pretty hard the WHOLE day. I was in the top 10 after day one in those conditions...with a 308. Sure I was on fire...but you still have to be able to see the target and your misses.
I think this 4-20 I currently have is better than any other XTR2's Ive looked through. I was initially so excited with this scope I sold my SCR one and bought another with the H59...now Im wishing I wouldn't have after this last match. The rect is leaving me grasping at times. And my new 4-20 glass isn't as nice as this one. Close but you can tell as dusk as you mentioned. Again, ive been shooting matches for 10 years, ive shot in the dark 1 time....
Now where I would not technically disagree, but as yet it hasn't bit me, is the tracking/other components department. Ite pretty obvious some have bad glass examples. BUT I have yet to read ANY post on one not tracking. Even Killswitch engage test (
and the reason I went with XTR2) said it was boringly accurate and maybe the best tracker of the bunch he has tested. Ill take tracking 10/10 times over glass (ahem Athlon) all day every day...
As to the NF SHV, I think its over priced for the features, doesn't have F1 in 4-20 range, is 30mm tube, has a smaller FOV, dont like the knobs, less elevation travel, dont like the rect, the glass is a wash, and is too long. The only feature the SHV has the XTR2 doesn't is focus under 50m...Ive shot under 50m the same number of times Ive shot in the dark with this scope...ha. That 4-16 atacr on the other hand could be fun...
Bro that sucks. I have had or have seen all triggers go down sans 2. TT (they new give em time lol) and Tubbs. I hope you get your shit together lol I kid. Its tough to remember to clean the trigger...but Jewels are great if you keep the dust out of them.
Will be shooting In NE Breakneck in 2 weeks and CO Telluride in a month (both 308) then some team matches in June and July, then RO'in Mile High again unless my baby arrives early...hoping he likes it in there till August lol.
Thanks Steve I appreciate it. As a father of 2 with a nother on the way and working construction...matches are now my practice lol That's why this thread is even a thing. Gotta keep momma happy.
I shot a straight 6BR shooting 95s over 3k (gasp don't tell the internet ninjas on that 6br thread lol) with a long barrel. Check this thread for my load workup. I was having a time finding a node it jumped at well. Settled at 0.120 jump. The vertical is redic low. And yes load is on hot side. But Im over a grain (almost 5% under max) under flat primer pressure and I did the water test with no probs. For the second match in a row I had an SD of 3.5 and then 3 for 6 shots. The problem with the 95's is Im still giving up .2-.3 tenths of wind to everyone else on the squad. Cant wait for those 105's to ship.
http://www.snipershide.com/shooting...5-gr-berger-vld-jumping.6880447/#post-7031280
Now as for the stage, it was a hidden target stage. So there were 2 targets at the same distance on a steep hill at 500 yards. One above the other. You couldn't see the bottom one because the hill in front of it (at roughly 200 yds) hid it when you laid down prone. You could hit it if you aimed at the hill in front of you, and the bullet would arc over the hill, and drop down and impact. The problem was you couldn't lay down to try to find an aiming pt on hill blocking target off the clock, and if you moved when it was your turn, the aiming pt might be a miss. Since the target was hidden, if you missed, it would be impossible to make a correction for next shot. SO best option is to get a precise ref pt, like the corner of the higher target, and hold under that ref pt the distance the hidden target is below. We had a spotting scope on a tripod at the staging area so we measured the hidden target exactly 5.5 mils under the target you could see.
The normal plan is to dial the same distance for both targets, shoot the top one, aim under the top pt 5.5 mils (the center crosshair is now in a brush pile on hill pointing at hidden target) and shoot again. Easy peezy. Unless you cant hold under 5 mils because your rect only goes to 3 mils. So if I held to that plan, I would be air guessing/floating the final 2 mils. So I left my turret at 0 which meant I had to hold over 2 mils for both targets. Holding over 2 mils for the hidden target left 3 mils left for a ref pt to hold under. Lucky really and the numbers weren't exact but close enough to get hits. Essentially I was holding over 2 mils for both target as they were the same distance. Works great until you forget to hold over the 2 mil I didn't dial on the easy big huuuge target. ha
Regards,
DT