• Having trouble using the site?

    Contact support
  • You Should Now Be Receiving Emails!

    The email issued mentioned earlier this week is now fixed! You may also have received previous emails that were meant to be sent over the last few days - apologies, this was a one time issue and shouldn't happen again!

Hunting & Fishing Shoot Slow----as fast as you can

Re: Shoot Slow----as fast as you can

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: MuleHunter</div><div class="ubbcode-body">No not at all. I understand the need for proper management. But you don't see me taking $10,000 from a dude in Africa to fly him over hear to shoot a Coyote in my back yard that i can do myself. You can justify it however you want but you know as well as i do that the guys going over there to shoot a big cat aren't doing it just to help out the locals. </div></div>

No justifcation is necessary it is the same as the money that is collected from elk and mule deer tags from the state. The money goes into habitat and such to help manage and help the species. The wolf is a great example of not being managed with science but with emotions and that has proved that does not work. Trying to compare africa to na game management is very apples and oranges. Those trophy fees that are charged there help the locals out with buying supplies they need and other wise would not get. And to suplimenet that they would just poach the big cats into extinction. Right now the cat populations are healthier than they have been before the start of market hunting and black market trading.
 
Re: Shoot Slow----as fast as you can

Cool video. Just proves stuff happens. I am all for trophy game hunting. If I had the financial resources, I would go after the Big Five in a heartbeat. I also agree the management model practiced in Africa has been proven to be very effective.

Shooting an animal "off of" a person under attack can indeed be risky business. We recently had a hunter killed in a grizzly bear attack. The autopsy confirmed the cause of death was a single round through the chest fired at the bear by the hunter's buddy. A bad deal all the way around.

As far as practicing for that type of event, our regional grizzly bear management team uses a prop that consists of a barrel on a cable system that comes right at the shooter.
 
Re: Shoot Slow----as fast as you can

Not that it really matters, but I don't think you'll find anywhere that will hunt lions for 10k. 14day hunts in Zambia go for around 45K depending on the outfitter.
 
Re: Shoot Slow----as fast as you can

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: MuleHunter</div><div class="ubbcode-body">How much of that does the state get to help 'management'?

There something wrong with a guy that wants to kill everything that breathes! Whats next beating puppies with kittens? </div></div>

I would guess sci or dallas safari club might have those answers. I have not the time or want to look it all up for you. Why do you shoot the cute little mule deer what did they ever do to you? It seems it has to do more with the fact you dont want or have enough money to do it. So is it bad i just go shoot pdogs and dont eat them? What makes one animal more important than another? It is reasoning like this is why we spend millions on horses when they could just be sent to a slaughter house. Animals are managed through science not ethics or emotion if that was the case PETA would be in charge. Just becasue some one shoots 1 lion they want to kill every thing? Now if they have the box of the truck filled with simba than hang them buy there balls. As long as all regulations and laws are followed i dont see an issue. compound Bow hunters think rifle hunters are blood thursty cock suckers Then traditional archery hunters hate compound bows. As an out doors group all we are doing is splitting our selves up to be picked group by group. This is no differnet do you hunt from a pickup thread it all depends on what part of the country you are from.
 
Re: Shoot Slow----as fast as you can

Most guys here will never face anything more risky than a coyote and that is a true shame.

Dangerous game is just like hunting, only much more of a primal experience. Not to mention a vivid reminder of where we really belong on the food chain.
Lots of guys talk big before they meet the monster on his own turf. Nobody does afterward.

As much as hunting is a rewarding and profound experience dangerous game is so much more.

Then there is Africa...Every warm blooded hunting male should have the right to (at least once) hunt the most amazing place on Earth. Among those that go to Africa you often hear there are those that have been back and those that are going back...True that.

Yogi Berra's quote helped inspire me and keep me focused.... "If you don't know where you are going, you'll end up someplace else".
You too can get to Africa on the average guy's wage...Just have to stay focused and want it bad enough.
You can do it well for about the price of a scoped AI.

Peace
 
Re: Shoot Slow----as fast as you can

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Kurt</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: MuleHunter</div><div class="ubbcode-body">How much of that does the state get to help 'management'?

There something wrong with a guy that wants to kill everything that breathes! Whats next beating puppies with kittens? </div></div>

I would guess sci or dallas safari club might have those answers. I have not the time or want to look it all up for you. Why do you shoot the cute little mule deer what did they ever do to you? It seems it has to do more with the fact you dont want or have enough money to do it. So is it bad i just go shoot pdogs and dont eat them? What makes one animal more important than another? It is reasoning like this is why we spend millions on horses when they could just be sent to a slaughter house. Animals are managed through science not ethics or emotion if that was the case PETA would be in charge. Just becasue some one shoots 1 lion they want to kill every thing? Now if they have the box of the truck filled with simba than hang them buy there balls. As long as all regulations and laws are followed i dont see an issue. compound Bow hunters think rifle hunters are blood thursty cock suckers Then traditional archery hunters hate compound bows. As an out doors group all we are doing is splitting our selves up to be picked group by group. This is no differnet do you hunt from a pickup thread it all depends on what part of the country you are from. </div></div>

Your post is full of many points, i don't know where to begin so i'll address them in order.

1) There is no suprise that when a trophy hunting guide service charges large amounts for a trophy animal they are pocketing most of the profits. My statement was a Rhetorical question. If i buy a $75 tag here in Washington and then pay an outfitter $3,000 to take me on a hunt, who is getting the remainder of the money? Not the state wildlife program. Im not saying that guides don't work hard or earn their money i just think its a flimsy argument to say that that money is going towards protecting the animal.

2) I kill those cute little mule deer for 2 reasons. One, i love the meat. It feeds my family all year and it is ethical to kill to eat. In fact i personnaly feel that if a man wants to eat meat its better to go harvest it yourself than to buy meat from the store from an animal that has most likely been mistreated or pumped with things that i don't want in my body or my kid's body. The second, I'll admit the racks are beautiful to look at and i never get tired of looking at antlers, but its a side benefit not primarily what im after (not to mention mature bucks equal bigger bodies equals more meat) but i would not kill something for the soul purpose of punching a knotch in my belt, or for the adreniline rush, or the excitement of killing, or putting my life in danger. Not to mention that it puts me outside in some beautiful country for days on end with spectacular scenery.

3) Prarie dogs. If i owned a ranch and my lively hood was tied up in the welfare of my cattle or horses and my livestock were breaking ankles in prarie dog holes than yes, i would shoot them and get rid of them like any other pest or like rats in my home. Would i drive miles away and line up on a prarie dog town and spend a weekend exterminating them just because they are 'fun to kill', NO. I don't go out into the woods and shoot anything that moves either. If i had a friend that owned a ranch and needed help with his pest problem then ya, i would help.

4) What makes one animal more important than another? Good question. We should be good stewards of our natural recources. Where one animal threatens the extinction of another should we step in? I think so but i think it could also be handled locally. To me its like the Wolf population that is getting out of hand in the states. Do we have a responsibility to the animals that the wolves are decimating to step in? I think so. Should we spend a fortune just to kill several animals for no <span style="text-decoration: underline">useful</span> purpose other than bragging rights or for the thrill? No i don't think we should. Emotions have nothing to do with it. Ethics are vital. It's what seperates us from psycho's. If you have no Ethics or Emotions what are you?

5) <span style="color: #FF0000">Now if they have the box of the truck filled with simba than hang them buy there balls.</span> Careful dude because that sounds like your personal Ethics.

To sum up. I think a man should only hunt to feed his family or protect his way of life. To hunt for the thrill of the kill to ME (again i know people don't agree with me) is wrong. I am not putting myself on a pedestal as a moral authority either. I think everyone has the right to make there own decisions but i also believe we will be held accountable for them. If most of the guys that go over there are being honest with themselves they go for the danger or thrill of it. That is why they call it the Dangerous Five. I don't think we should treat our lives or the lives of animals with disrespect. Its an issue to me of Sanctity of life, both mine and theirs. If the ruling government decides through science and ethics (i think the two go hand in hand) that they have a predator problem and a responsibility to fix it why cant it be handled locally like we do in our local states? I think those guys go over there for the thrill and then to make it politicly correct, or so they can feel justified, they say they are doing it for conservation, which i think is BS. We don't have to agree but i only defended my position because i felt like i was expected to.

p.s. I only commented on this subject further after getting the green light from the OP.
 
Re: Shoot Slow----as fast as you can

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: MuleHunter</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Kurt</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: MuleHunter</div><div class="ubbcode-body">How much of that does the state get to help 'management'?

There something wrong with a guy that wants to kill everything that breathes! Whats next beating puppies with kittens? </div></div>

I would guess sci or dallas safari club might have those answers. I have not the time or want to look it all up for you. Why do you shoot the cute little mule deer what did they ever do to you? It seems it has to do more with the fact you dont want or have enough money to do it. So is it bad i just go shoot pdogs and dont eat them? What makes one animal more important than another? It is reasoning like this is why we spend millions on horses when they could just be sent to a slaughter house. Animals are managed through science not ethics or emotion if that was the case PETA would be in charge. Just becasue some one shoots 1 lion they want to kill every thing? Now if they have the box of the truck filled with simba than hang them buy there balls. As long as all regulations and laws are followed i dont see an issue. compound Bow hunters think rifle hunters are blood thursty cock suckers Then traditional archery hunters hate compound bows. As an out doors group all we are doing is splitting our selves up to be picked group by group. This is no differnet do you hunt from a pickup thread it all depends on what part of the country you are from. </div></div>

Your post is full of many points, i don't know where to begin so i'll address them in order.

1) There is no suprise that when a trophy hunting guide service charges large amounts for a trophy animal they are pocketing most of the profits. My statement was a Rhetorical question. If i buy a $75 tag here in Washington and then pay an outfitter $3,000 to take me on a hunt, who is getting the remainder of the money? Not the state wildlife program. Im not saying that guides don't work hard or earn their money i just think its a flimsy argument to say that that money is going towards protecting the animal.
<span style="color: #FFFF66">Is non of that 3000 going to habitat. I know where i help guide pheasants we are planting trees and making sure the birds have a viable food source all winter and the last 2 have been tough. But with alot of time and money the numbers are alot better than places that dont take time to improve cover and food. </span>
2) I kill those cute little mule deer for 2 reasons. One, i love the meat. It feeds my family all year and it is ethical to kill to eat. In fact i personnaly feel that if a man wants to eat meat its better to go harvest it yourself than to buy meat from the store from an animal that has most likely been mistreated or pumped with things that i don't want in my body or my kid's body. The second, I'll admit the racks are beautiful to look at and i never get tired of looking at antlers, but its a side benefit not primarily what im after (not to mention mature bucks equal bigger bodies equals more meat) but i would not kill something for the soul purpose of punching a knotch in my belt, or for the adreniline rush, or the excitement of killing, or putting my life in danger. Not to mention that it puts me outside in some beautiful country for days on end with spectacular scenery.
<span style="color: #FF0000">That was me being a smart ass i will admit i eat the shit out of deer, goats, pheasants, ducks,geese,grouse.
The same can be said going to africa it is beatiful i have heard never been and a whole differnt experience than what you get in NA</span>
3) Prarie dogs. If i owned a ranch and my lively hood was tied up in the welfare of my cattle or horses and my livestock were breaking ankles in prarie dog holes than yes, i would shoot them and get rid of them like any other pest or like rats in my home. Would i drive miles away and line up on a prarie dog town and spend a weekend exterminating them just because they are 'fun to kill', NO. I don't go out into the woods and shoot anything that moves either. If i had a friend that owned a ranch and needed help with his pest problem then ya, i would help.
<span style="color: #FF0000">I only have to drive 2 miles and i do just go out to shoot them as they are pests. Also it is fun just to shoot with freinds at other than steel. I can say alot more stuff got killed when i was 10 roaming the country with a .22 but as i got older the kill is less. Also shooting pdogs from far away is a great challenge</span>
4) What makes one animal more important than another? Good question. We should be good stewards of our natural recources. Where one animal threatens the extinction of another should we step in? I think so but i think it could also be handled locally. To me its like the Wolf population that is getting out of hand in the states. Do we have a responsibility to the animals that the wolves are decimating to step in? I think so. Should we spend a fortune just to kill several animals for no <span style="text-decoration: underline">useful</span> purpose other than bragging rights or for the thrill? No i don't think we should. Emotions have nothing to do with it. Ethics are vital. It's what seperates us from psycho's. If you have no Ethics or Emotions what are you?
<span style="color: #CC0000">Being good stewards of animals would manageing the population ie taking only old males that are not helping the species reproduce any more. If you let big cats go over the lands carry capacity then problems with unwanted human interaction would take place. Then knee jerk reactions take place and more is hurt in the end. Ethics do play a small part but emotion plays no role people look at lions like in the cartoon lion king not as an animal thats needs management the same as deer</span>5) <span style="color: #FF0000">Now if they have the box of the truck filled with simba than hang them buy there balls.</span> Careful dude because that sounds like your personal Ethics.
<span style="color: #FF0000">That breaks the law that was set buy biologists so i guess you could say it was un ethical as law as unlawful</span>To sum up. I think a man should only hunt to feed his family or protect his way of life. To hunt for the thrill of the kill to ME (again i know people don't agree with me) is wrong. I am not putting myself on a pedestal as a moral authority either. I think everyone has the right to make there own decisions but i also believe we will be held accountable for them. If most of the guys that go over there are being honest with themselves they go for the danger or thrill of it. That is why they call it the Dangerous Five. I don't think we should treat our lives or the lives of animals with disrespect. Its an issue to me of Sanctity of life, both mine and theirs. If the ruling government decides through science and ethics (i think the two go hand in hand) that they have a predator problem and a responsibility to fix it why cant it be handled locally like we do in our local states? I think those guys go over there for the thrill and then to make it politicly correct, or so they can feel justified, they say they are doing it for conservation, which i think is BS. We don't have to agree but i only defended my position because i felt like i was expected to.
<span style="color: #FF0000">There is nothing pc about killing an animal in todays pussified culture. It is like having to say harvest, you harvest plants you kill animals simple as that. In the end if we keep bickering amongst our selves all hunting be it big cats deer birds will not be enjoyed buy the future youth. We need a strong front to combat the likes of peta and hsus. We can all have our beliefs of what we like and dont but in the end if we start taking a little here and a little there in the end we will have nothing left. Dont take this as a personal attack just a discusion on the internet i am sure on 99% of other things outdoors i would agree with you. It is also fun to have a discusion on different points of view some times. Another thing i will agree with i love a set of big muley antlers.</span>

p.s. I only commented on this subject further after getting the green light from the OP. </div></div>
 
Re: Shoot Slow----as fast as you can

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Whats next beating puppies with kittens? </div></div> That would be an extremely effective method for calling coyotes.