Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I propose four additional site rules:During WWI the germans loaded regular bullets backward to penetrate the armor (6 to 12mm) of the british MKI tanks. They also increased the charge significantly. This ended up causing rifles to blow up occasionally. The backward bullet got some of the blame for this. But it was likely the powder increase that blew the guns up.
Bullet stability is not just a twist rate, length, weight calculation. It also has a meaningful variable for muzzle velocity. a 1:12 twist at 3000 fps is 3000 rpm. the same bullet may likely still be well over 1100 rpm by the time it slows down to transonic speeds through air drag. However, when it has a 1100 fps muzzle velocity the bullet is only 1100 rpm. 1100 rpm will absolutely not stabilize the bullet as well at 1100 fps as 3000 rpm will stabilize it at 3000 fps. Bullets slow down at in air faster then they spin down. Nowhere close.
Rearward flying bullets, especially OTM with a shallow taper boat tail do have better balance than forward bullets. However, there are a lot of additional considerations. If you are inclined to work up a load you should also be inclined to test it for results. The bigger challenge is how to get uniform muzzle velocity with a case that has a tiny powder charge that might be distributed anywhere when the primer goes off. That is the challenge.
Oh My... Resurrected a 5 year old thread. Oops.
What!?!?
Think again. There's more than that wrong with the information in your post.But the rest of the issue about why subsonic bullets require a tighter twist rate to stabilize is correct.
Wouldn't it be easier to simply turn the rifle backwards? Or does that not work because then you have to stay out of the way of the muzzle? ?I have tried 175 SMK's loaded backwards with trailboss. They left the barrel, but they made a hell of a strange noise...
All that experiment proves is that crappy ammo does not shoot accurately at short range either.Here's some entertainment for you. I can neither confirm nor deny--just gonna leave it laying here.
The Box O' Truth #50 - Shooting Bullets Backwards - Page 1
Did your load achieve minute-of-German-tank-bullshit-story?
During WWI the germans loaded regular bullets backward to penetrate the armor (6 to 12mm) of the british MKI tanks. They also increased the charge significantly. This ended up causing rifles to blow up occasionally. The backward bullet got some of the blame for this. But it was likely the powder increase that blew the guns up.
Bullet stability is not just a twist rate, length, weight calculation. It also has a meaningful variable for muzzle velocity. a 1:12 twist at 3000 fps is 3000 rpm. the same bullet may likely still be well over 1100 rpm by the time it slows down to transonic speeds through air drag. However, when it has a 1100 fps muzzle velocity the bullet is only 1100 rpm. 1100 rpm will absolutely not stabilize the bullet as well at 1100 fps as 3000 rpm will stabilize it at 3000 fps. Bullets slow down at in air faster then they spin down. Nowhere close.
Rearward flying bullets, especially OTM with a shallow taper boat tail do have better balance than forward bullets. However, there are a lot of additional considerations. If you are inclined to work up a load you should also be inclined to test it for results. The bigger challenge is how to get uniform muzzle velocity with a case that has a tiny powder charge that might be distributed anywhere when the primer goes off. That is the challenge.
Oh My... Resurrected a 5 year old thread. Oops.