Re: Single Stage Press Advice
I've been using a Dillon RL550B since I started handloading close to two decades ago. While I can easily concede that with all stacking tolerances, etc., considered, the single stage press has less going on than the progressive; I still recommend the press I have, for the applications I favor.
If I were a BR shooter, I wouldn't.
I shoot F Class and was once deeply committed to High Power National Match Course.
It's my conclusion that for these disciplines, a SAAMI chamber spec is both adequately effective, and easier to load for. Consequently, I have also concluded that whatever deviations from the ideal a progressive press introduces into my ammunition are of negligible harm.
While many will feel that the only degree of ammunition fabrication quality that is acceptable is the highest achievable, I find that most of the ammunition I fabricate on my press performs, in my hands, at least as well ammunition from any other, presumably more precise, source.
I think it's very easily possible to take this stuff too seriously, and that reasonable diligence will thoroughly suffice. I also think that options and ease of use constitute more significant advantages than infinitesimally anal concentration on the smallest details.
The Dillon tool head, and the Hornady Lock-N-Load bushings, allow dies to be adjusted to a closely ideal degree, and then be kept at that ideal adjustment through separate loading sessions. The Dillon 550's manual advance allows some, or all, assembly stages to be performed in a manner which is functionally very similar to a single stage press' operation. Properly adjusted and operated; the shell plate and priming systems provide, at least for me, quite adequate 'feel' to determine factors and issues that are critical to good ammunition fabrication.
The Dillon powder measures are not ideal with stick powders, but I weigh all charges anyway, so this is not the detractor many might consider it to be.
I strongly urge consideration of the Dillon RL550B press.
Greg