Spotting Nation State/Agitator Accounts

[MadDuner]

Personally I try to avoid being like the people who made the darkest history.

And I don’t want a list anyways, I don’t need, want, or think I have a right to know ones personal details just because I don’t agree with them, I simply don’t have a fuck to give, as a properly raised man I can have a debate without losing control of my emotions and having violent outrage that I just subject on some other person.

I would settle for honest elections and term limits....
and the rest of it would sort itself out.

 

[Fig]

Socialism and Communism are based on violence and force. That they resort to violence is inevitable if they actually believe the ideology they espouse and aren't garden variety thieves, like most Democrats, just looking to steal something. To be a "Socialist" or a "Marxist" is to want violence, and to invite hatred into your heart on purpose. Hard work is not for the revolutionary, and make no mistake, they're all revolutionaries. No matter how stupid or insignificant a person is they all think they're going to be in-charge and not a member of the proletariat.

This is part of the reason why they are so gobsmackingly ignorant. In practice their ideology is noting but unrequited toil, and yet that is precisely what it promises to free them of... You have to be a total moron to believe any of it, and they are.

“Within the capitalist system all methods for raising the social productiveness of labour are brought about at the cost of the individual labourer; all means for the development of production transform themselves into means of domination over, and exploitation of, the producers; they mutilate the labourer into a fragment of a man, degrade him to the level of an appendage of a machine, destroy every remnant of charm in his work and turn it into a hated toil; they estrange from him the intellectual potentialities of the labour process in the same proportion as science is incorporated in it as an independent power; they distort the conditions under which he works, subject him during the labour process to a despotism the more hateful for its meanness; they transform his life-time into working-time, and drag his wife and child beneath the wheels of the Juggernaut of capital. But all methods for the production of surplus-value are at the same time methods of accumulation; and every extension of accumulation becomes again a means for the development of those methods. It follows therefore that in proportion as capital accumulates, the lot of the labourer, be his payment high or low, must grow worse. The law, finally, that always equilibrates the relative surplus population, or industrial reserve army, to the extent and energy of accumulation, this law rivets the labourer to capital more firmly than the wedges of Vulcan did Prometheus to the rock. It establishes an accumulation of misery, corresponding with accumulation of capital. Accumulation of wealth at one pole is, therefore, at the same time accumulation of misery, agony of toil slavery, ignorance, brutality, mental degradation, at the opposite pole, i.e., on the side of the class that produces its own product in the form of capital.”​

― Karl Marx, Capital, Vol. 1: A Critical Analysis of Capitalist Production

 

[TurboTrout]

I would settle for honest elections and term limits....
and the rest of it would sort itself out.

What does the election matter when the gov is indoctrinating the kids via “free education”, controlling the media, and the police will enforce ANYTHING gov says.

Politicians are vetted to the point that it’s the illusion on choice, just look how Bush jr vs Obama was marketed, yet they were practically the exact same product.

Besides there is a damn good reason elections have never been regulated nearly as much as any of our other rights.

 

[SilentStalkr]

I just want to know 6 Creedmoor, 6.5Creedmoor or .308Win?

 

[silentwoods]

What does the election matter when the gov is indoctrinating the kids via “free education”, controlling the media, and the police will enforce ANYTHING gov says.

Politicians are vetted to the point that it’s the illusion on choice, just look how Bush jr vs Obama was marketed, yet they were practically the exact same product.

Besides there is a damn good reason elections have never been regulated nearly as much as any of our other rights

I agree.

Fluffer?

I'll probably get a horses head delivered by special courier within 36 hours.

Yes @THEIS I am joking.

 

[TriggerJerk!]

 

[The King]

Socialism and Communism are based on violence and force. That they resort to violence is inevitable if they actually believe the ideology they espouse and aren't garden variety thieves, like most Democrats, just looking to steal something. To be a "Socialist" or a "Marxist" is to want violence, and to invite hatred into your heart on purpose. Hard work is not for the revolutionary, and make no mistake, they're all revolutionaries. No matter how stupid or insignificant a person is they all think they're going to be in-charge and not a member of the proletariat.

This is part of the reason why they are so gobsmackingly ignorant. In practice their ideology is noting but unrequited toil, and yet that is precisely what it promises to free them of... You have to be a total moron to believe any of it, and they are.

“Within the capitalist system all methods for raising the social productiveness of labour are brought about at the cost of the individual labourer; all means for the development of production transform themselves into means of domination over, and exploitation of, the producers; they mutilate the labourer into a fragment of a man, degrade him to the level of an appendage of a machine, destroy every remnant of charm in his work and turn it into a hated toil; they estrange from him the intellectual potentialities of the labour process in the same proportion as science is incorporated in it as an independent power; they distort the conditions under which he works, subject him during the labour process to a despotism the more hateful for its meanness; they transform his life-time into working-time, and drag his wife and child beneath the wheels of the Juggernaut of capital. But all methods for the production of surplus-value are at the same time methods of accumulation; and every extension of accumulation becomes again a means for the development of those methods. It follows therefore that in proportion as capital accumulates, the lot of the labourer, be his payment high or low, must grow worse. The law, finally, that always equilibrates the relative surplus population, or industrial reserve army, to the extent and energy of accumulation, this law rivets the labourer to capital more firmly than the wedges of Vulcan did Prometheus to the rock. It establishes an accumulation of misery, corresponding with accumulation of capital. Accumulation of wealth at one pole is, therefore, at the same time accumulation of misery, agony of toil slavery, ignorance, brutality, mental degradation, at the opposite pole, i.e., on the side of the class that produces its own product in the form of capital.”​

― Karl Marx, Capital, Vol. 1: A Critical Analysis of Capitalist Production

The hard part of the Marx/Engel work is that it was a direct response to industrialization in the early days.

And at that time, the Governments that were were 0 help, the brutality of private police hired by factory owners was legendary, and the conditions were appalling. Inhuman even.

If the captains of industry of the day had backed the fuck off of that last .10$ and treated folks with decency we wouldn’t have ever had two of the most destructive forces in modern times - labor unions and Marxism.

Instead they pushed as hard as they could, and for the most part the benefits of industrialization hadn’t fully landed yet and it created quite the power vacuum that Marx was able to step into.

Today, Marx himself would have calmed down and read a book, browsed the internet, spanked it to PornHub, and ate a Filet Mignon every afternoon until dying comfortably of old age in what he considered a society so close to perfect it needed no tampering.

The growth of modern Marxism is an intentionally destructive paradigm driven by our enemies - all of whom nearly wrecked their nations with Marxism and mostly view it as a disease.

Modern Chinese economic policy is only inches away from American policy, and our domestic police state is growing into its own Social Scoring System and camps for our Uighurs and Tibetans.

 

[W54/XM-388]

The hard part of the Marx/Engel work is that it was a direct response to industrialization in the early days.

And at that time, the Governments that were were 0 help, the brutality of private police hired by factory owners was legendary, and the conditions were appalling. Inhuman even.

If the captains of industry of the day had backed the fuck off of that last .10$ and treated folks with decency we wouldn’t have ever had two of the most destructive forces in modern times - labor unions and Marxism.

Instead they pushed as hard as they could, and for the most part the benefits of industrialization hadn’t fully landed yet and it created quite the power vacuum that Marx was able to step into.

Today, Marx himself would have calmed down and read a book, browsed the internet, spanked it to PornHub, and ate a Filet Mignon every afternoon until dying comfortably of old age in what he considered a society so close to perfect it needed no tampering.

The growth of modern Marxism is an intentionally destructive paradigm driven by our enemies - all of whom nearly wrecked their nations with Marxism and mostly view it as a disease.

Modern Chinese economic policy is only inches away from American policy, and our domestic police state is growing into its own Social Scoring System and camps for our Uighurs and Tibetans.

I would suggest if you look at how "Big Tech" and the "Big multinationals" (such as Amazon) are acting right now, you'll start seeing parallels with what happened in the late 1800s.

The Rich want it all, want do destroy any competition and want to be as brutal and evil to their workers as possible.
Amazon specifically seems to be trying to bring back the bad old days of tyrannical industrialists.

Once again, the seeds are being sown for a fanatical rebirth of an even more brutal form of Communism as the "solution" to the destruction of the working class / middle class.

 

[The King]

I would suggest if you look at how "Big Tech" and the "Big multinationals" (such as Amazon) are acting right now, you'll start seeing parallels with what happened in the late 1800s.

The Rich want it all, want do destroy any competition and want to be as brutal and evil to their workers as possible.
Amazon specifically seems to be trying to bring back the bad old days of tyrannical industrialists.

Once again, the seeds are being sown for a fanatical rebirth of an even more brutal form of Communism as the "solution" to the destruction of the working class / middle class.

I’m pretty sure tyrannically motivated industrialists are natural feature of technic society.

 

[Bender]

Hi,

Shhhh not yet, lolol

Sincerely,
Theis

Lmfao!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[Snipe260]

Lmfao!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

View attachment 7834121

Is this still available?

 

[DarnYankeeUSMC]

I'll tell you exactly why these douchnozzles are here. They fetishize the government murdering all the citizens they disagree with (they literally can't stop talking about it, or accusing us of doing the same against the communists), and from their basements playing first person shooting games they wish it was more than just a fantasy. They don't know jack about guns or shooting or war, but they fantasize about being a mass murdering asshat:

They don't live in the real world.

Theirs is an online only one where everyone is a woketard.

Looks like a few decided that they were ready for the big show and jumped a flight to Ukraine.
What a difference a year makes