Hello, Any input regarding the info. below is Greatly Appreciated.
Has anyone tried this or does anyone know if this will clear: ARMS #22 LOW 30mm w/ Leupold 40mm Obj. Scope & SWAN Sleeve, SPR Mod 0. Anyone using a really long riser with a similar setup?
ARMS #22 LOW 30mm
.925 Center of Optic to Base Height
w/
Leupold 40mm Obj. Scope & SWAN Sleeve or Extended Riser
<span style="text-decoration: underline"><span style="font-style: italic">
My measurements are:</span></span>
Leupold Obj. Dia. = 1.831"
Tube Dia. = 1.182" = .649" difference / 2 = .3245"
Tube Dia. 1.182" / 2 = .591"+.3245" = .9155"
<span style="font-weight: bold">The ARMS #22 LOW Height .925"-.9155" = .0095 of room from base to objective. [ ??? ]</span>
Reason I ask, Sometimes Manuf. are +/- with their #(s), so wondering if anyone has successfully used #22 LOW with an extended rail under the scope objective. Also, I have already put in consideration of the Obj. Flip Cap. I am using a 2.5" sunshade with Flip Caps. I am using a Riser thats REALLY Long, so I have put the BC Flip Cap into consideration. The Sunshade with Flip Cap extends far enough forward to clear the long riser/rail.
I dont want to use any higher rings then needed as I find this height perfect; 1.425" w/ riser/rings.
I am trying to find out the exact amount of space there is below the Objectives Largest OD portion "without" flip cap to the top of the ARMS SWAN Sleeve/Ext. Riser.
Thank you for the help,
FTK
Has anyone tried this or does anyone know if this will clear: ARMS #22 LOW 30mm w/ Leupold 40mm Obj. Scope & SWAN Sleeve, SPR Mod 0. Anyone using a really long riser with a similar setup?
ARMS #22 LOW 30mm
.925 Center of Optic to Base Height
w/
Leupold 40mm Obj. Scope & SWAN Sleeve or Extended Riser
<span style="text-decoration: underline"><span style="font-style: italic">
My measurements are:</span></span>
Leupold Obj. Dia. = 1.831"
Tube Dia. = 1.182" = .649" difference / 2 = .3245"
Tube Dia. 1.182" / 2 = .591"+.3245" = .9155"
<span style="font-weight: bold">The ARMS #22 LOW Height .925"-.9155" = .0095 of room from base to objective. [ ??? ]</span>
Reason I ask, Sometimes Manuf. are +/- with their #(s), so wondering if anyone has successfully used #22 LOW with an extended rail under the scope objective. Also, I have already put in consideration of the Obj. Flip Cap. I am using a 2.5" sunshade with Flip Caps. I am using a Riser thats REALLY Long, so I have put the BC Flip Cap into consideration. The Sunshade with Flip Cap extends far enough forward to clear the long riser/rail.
I dont want to use any higher rings then needed as I find this height perfect; 1.425" w/ riser/rings.
I am trying to find out the exact amount of space there is below the Objectives Largest OD portion "without" flip cap to the top of the ARMS SWAN Sleeve/Ext. Riser.
Thank you for the help,
FTK