What do you guys think of grabbing one of these and tossing the stock for a new HS precsion or McMillan A5? I previously had my eyes set on the the Remington 700 police LTR model, but that costs $1,000 and comes with an even worse stock than the SPS Varmint, so I was pushed toward the Tikka T3xs and Bergara B-14s. Having tested both those actions in person at my LGS, the bergara had an infinitely better action in terms of the cocking mechanism, so smooth that you could almost do it with your finger. Maybe the Tikkas break in better overtime or can be worked on to get rid of the stickyness. I thought for a second that maybe it was due to the heavier weight of the Bergara vs the Lite hunter stock on the Tikka, so I held the stock in place as firmly as I could and tried again but to no avail. That pretty much made my decision for me, cosidering the Tikka lite stock is kind of crappy compared to the rigid A5-style bergara (for a benchrest shooter gun), but yet they cost the same amount, so buying the tikka in 308 I would inevitably fill it with lead or toss it for KRG- pushing my total up to about 15/1600$, rather than 1000$ out the door for the bergara.
(note: to be fair the bolt cycling* forward-back was better on the Tikka action, just as everyone has said, its just got a very sticky cocking mechanism, compared to the Bergara which was smooth in both ways but only ever so slighty less in the forward-back cycling)
Now to be clear I am almost certainly still going to get that Bergara, I'm aware that its a much better gun than the 700 in many other way, but is that SPS a good deal to get for me to do a more custom build and learn more about gunsmithing? The 700 seems to be the Ford F-150 of the gun world and everyone hates on them yet they have 4 in thier safe.
And with a better stock can that 700 start to compete with the bergara in accuracy? I've read guys saying they went from .75 min avg to .5 min avg just from throwing the SPS varmint into a better stock.
Is it an issue that the Bergara is only 20" and the SPS Varmint is a wieldy 26"? (for me shooting out to about 7-800 yds)
another thing to consider the ability to have it rebarreled, pre-fit 700 barrels are everywhere but Bergara is rather new to the scene and when I called the guy was kind of an ass about even telling me if I could have the barrel replaced by them. He said they aren't made to allow for rebarreling despite marketing themselves as a "Remington 700 footprint"
The other option I had for a budget build was the Savage 110 tactical, for its MSRP ($800) I'd rather go for the Remington instead, but when they are around $5-600 then I get more curious. Another accurate budget rifle that gives you a heavy contour 308 threaded barrel + the added benefit of running AICS magpul 10 rounders right out the box
So for a total of about 12-1500$ after upgrades, is that Remington a decent buy over a Savage 110 tactical, for a build specific target gun?- meaning I don't intend to keep either of them the way they come
(note: to be fair the bolt cycling* forward-back was better on the Tikka action, just as everyone has said, its just got a very sticky cocking mechanism, compared to the Bergara which was smooth in both ways but only ever so slighty less in the forward-back cycling)
Now to be clear I am almost certainly still going to get that Bergara, I'm aware that its a much better gun than the 700 in many other way, but is that SPS a good deal to get for me to do a more custom build and learn more about gunsmithing? The 700 seems to be the Ford F-150 of the gun world and everyone hates on them yet they have 4 in thier safe.
And with a better stock can that 700 start to compete with the bergara in accuracy? I've read guys saying they went from .75 min avg to .5 min avg just from throwing the SPS varmint into a better stock.
Is it an issue that the Bergara is only 20" and the SPS Varmint is a wieldy 26"? (for me shooting out to about 7-800 yds)
another thing to consider the ability to have it rebarreled, pre-fit 700 barrels are everywhere but Bergara is rather new to the scene and when I called the guy was kind of an ass about even telling me if I could have the barrel replaced by them. He said they aren't made to allow for rebarreling despite marketing themselves as a "Remington 700 footprint"
The other option I had for a budget build was the Savage 110 tactical, for its MSRP ($800) I'd rather go for the Remington instead, but when they are around $5-600 then I get more curious. Another accurate budget rifle that gives you a heavy contour 308 threaded barrel + the added benefit of running AICS magpul 10 rounders right out the box
So for a total of about 12-1500$ after upgrades, is that Remington a decent buy over a Savage 110 tactical, for a build specific target gun?- meaning I don't intend to keep either of them the way they come