Rifle Scopes Spuhr One Piece or Two?

[Pete B]

Can anyone please put up a solid argument/reasoning that one is better than the other?
At face value, the single rings would appear to offer a more versatile set-up in regards to scope placement, though the one piece mount certainly seems more popular.
Thanks for the input.
Regards
Pete

 

[PinesAndProjectiles]

I haven't used the two piece rings, but I do have the mount. I prefer it because of the ease of leveling the scope in the mount. I can see how the rings would be beneficial as far as mounting options go.

 

[Threadcutter308]

The Spuhr one piece mounts are line bored as part of the machining/manufacturing process, which eliminates any possibility of (dual/individual) ring misalignment. I have multiple SP 4006’s and absolutely love them. There is no improvement possible with them. No more rings for me.

 

[RyanM]

I have both, had is more accurate I guess. I think if you are running a tubular fore-end the one piece mounts are the way to go as you need that extra bit of height anyways. I had SP-4001s on my AI and then now run customs in a regular style stock and don't need the height and now run the 1" rings.

I have high cheekbones so the lower the better for me overall.

The bubble level in the 1 piece mounts are much easier to see than in the really low rings though.

 

[gnatmm]

As far as I know the two piece rings are recommended by Spuhr himself just for really big scopes like the s&b 5-45. You can’t go wrong with any of the one piece mounts in all other configs.

 

[RTH1800]

If it says Spuhr, you will love it.

 

[Scotch_egg]

Which is the lowest 34mm Mount that will accommodate a PM11.