Re: Sslaughter in Norway
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Bondoscustomz1</div><div class="ubbcode-body">
I agree with you in a sense and understand where you are coming from. But He said he was targeting Muslims correct? If in fact he was targeting Muslims, he missed his calling. He wasn't killing Muslims. It was a bunch of kids. I want to point out that he had one hell of a plan to pull this off but still failed to target the right group ,if in fact that was who he was truly targeting. Now this is only from what I have seen and read and I was not there. Again, I understand your point but I BELIEVE that when a man or a group acts in a manner of terrorism against any group or person they sould NOT be allowed quarter,they should be executed if caught in the act by legal responders or even a legal concealed carry person responding to said act of terrorism. Am I wrong in my belief's? </div></div>
Kill them in the act, to protect people, sure. Kill them after the fact, no. Lets say you come on the scene but it had taken place in the US instead of there, and you see a bunch of dead people and a guy holding a gun, and you kill him. Good job. Now I come on the scene and see a bunch of dead people and YOU holding a gun, and I kill you. And on down the line. Those concealed carry people you speak of would be indistinguishable from the the bad guy in this case.
As long as nobody is in immmanent danger, I say slow down and sort things out, make sure you got the right guy, find out what his deal is, what makes him tick, so we can prevent future attacks, and then kill him legally, or put him in prison forever, whichever.
As far as his targets, A lot of the survivors had Muslim names. It sounds like that political party pandered to immigrants, and a lot of them were members. He targeted kids, which is not right. But I'll bet more of the people than you would expect were muslim, and the ones who were not were family of the people who let them in.
He probably didn't feel he could target the right group. There would be too much security. Also, liberals have a history of caving in to violent attacks.
The important thing to remember, is that this guy was wrong. But the problem he was agitated about isn't going away, and will kill far more people than he ever did.
We have 4,380 murders here in the US every year by immigrants. To say nothing of the rapes, assaults, robberies, and car accidents involving immigrants not licensed to drive. Why don't we care?
I know for sure that if someone showed the potential to attack my kids, I'd get out of politics.
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Bondoscustomz1</div><div class="ubbcode-body">
I agree with you in a sense and understand where you are coming from. But He said he was targeting Muslims correct? If in fact he was targeting Muslims, he missed his calling. He wasn't killing Muslims. It was a bunch of kids. I want to point out that he had one hell of a plan to pull this off but still failed to target the right group ,if in fact that was who he was truly targeting. Now this is only from what I have seen and read and I was not there. Again, I understand your point but I BELIEVE that when a man or a group acts in a manner of terrorism against any group or person they sould NOT be allowed quarter,they should be executed if caught in the act by legal responders or even a legal concealed carry person responding to said act of terrorism. Am I wrong in my belief's? </div></div>
Kill them in the act, to protect people, sure. Kill them after the fact, no. Lets say you come on the scene but it had taken place in the US instead of there, and you see a bunch of dead people and a guy holding a gun, and you kill him. Good job. Now I come on the scene and see a bunch of dead people and YOU holding a gun, and I kill you. And on down the line. Those concealed carry people you speak of would be indistinguishable from the the bad guy in this case.
As long as nobody is in immmanent danger, I say slow down and sort things out, make sure you got the right guy, find out what his deal is, what makes him tick, so we can prevent future attacks, and then kill him legally, or put him in prison forever, whichever.
As far as his targets, A lot of the survivors had Muslim names. It sounds like that political party pandered to immigrants, and a lot of them were members. He targeted kids, which is not right. But I'll bet more of the people than you would expect were muslim, and the ones who were not were family of the people who let them in.
He probably didn't feel he could target the right group. There would be too much security. Also, liberals have a history of caving in to violent attacks.
The important thing to remember, is that this guy was wrong. But the problem he was agitated about isn't going away, and will kill far more people than he ever did.
We have 4,380 murders here in the US every year by immigrants. To say nothing of the rapes, assaults, robberies, and car accidents involving immigrants not licensed to drive. Why don't we care?
I know for sure that if someone showed the potential to attack my kids, I'd get out of politics.