I get to read threads on this subject at least once a year here. Today, while going through the responses and agreeing with many, I realized that we may be missing the forest for the trees. I see comparisons to other shooting sports, racing and others but we are missing the other obvious comparisons. Sports like golf, biathlon, Tour de France, and similar that are very long format and boring to watch the whole thing.
To my point:
Further comparing to Golf:
The average racing fan sucks at driving, the average golfing fan sucks at golf. Same with all the sports. Shooting is no different.
All that matters is whether or not big money is interested in making it work or not. Because it will take big money to do it right.
To my point:
- You film the popular competitors and or teams. Amateurs only if they’re known or peak interest in another way.
- You don’t make the program 6-8 hours long. You focus on key stages or competitors/teams that are neck and neck.
- Use multiple cameras and angles, including go pros or occasionally trigger cams, but make sure you’ve got capable production crews that quickly adapt from one angle or competitor or location to another.
- Don’t expect that people will want to see all competitors and all stages.
Further comparing to Golf:
- A golf tournament is five days long, but most people tune in on Sunday for the final stretch where they focus on the players that are on the top of the leaderboard and key holes (stages).
- Regular informed commentators that have knowledge and style.
- Quick replays of big shots or big misses.
The average racing fan sucks at driving, the average golfing fan sucks at golf. Same with all the sports. Shooting is no different.
All that matters is whether or not big money is interested in making it work or not. Because it will take big money to do it right.