Re: Surgeon action prices?
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: selfbowhunter</div><div class="ubbcode-body">cartman,
you are so high speed that looks make no difference in your decisions? i hope you were not referring to me airing out dirty laundry. i did no such thing. i made an honest assesment IN MY OPINION. i would be willing to bet that jerry took absolutely no offense to anything i said. FOR ME, it simply boils down to looks and a couple of nice features. FOR YOU, it may be something entirely different. if i gave ANY impression i was bashing jerry i am sorry. that is absolutely not the case. were i to build two rifle, one on a surgeon and one on a stiller, and both shot the same, i would take the surgeon for looks. if the stiller shot lights out and the surgeon didnt, i would take the stiller. EVERY TIME.
chuck </div></div>
No dude, you've got it wrong. It did give me pause that looks was that big of a deal and no, it's never crossed my mind regarding a receiver. A nice piece of walnut for a hand-fitted stock? Yes, looks matter.
What I was warning about had nothing to do with you but with the shit storm that so regularly happens when a manufacturer or their rep gets on this board, folks start making wild claims usually based on hearsay or their own error, tempers flaring as people start fighting about it, the thread gets locked, and the maker refusing to ever return depriving us of a great resource. You've never noticed?
My bad for not making the effort to distinguish exactly what I was getting at. Hopefully that clears it up.