• Win a RIX Storm S3 Thermal Imaging Scope!

    To enter, all you need to do is add an image of yourself at the range below!

    Join the contest

Suspicion about child births

Smokeshot

Sergeant of the Hide
Full Member
Minuteman
Supporter
Oct 8, 2024
360
2,946
Illinois
This might sound crazy but my gut feeling is that something crazy is going on.

Okay, so my wife gave birth to our daughter in 2022. It was her last appointment 2 weeks before the due date and her doc said that our baby girl’s not gonna grow in the womb anymore so they’re gonna induce the labor. It took 35 hours to get the dilation to 10cm and then my girl was out in 20 minutes. I thank God for that event not turning into a c-section.

Anyways, since then, five friends of ours had kids and every single one of them was either induced or c-section. And I keep hearing about the same thing happening to friends of friends. So, what in the fuck is going on? Out of those five friends, one’s in California and one’s in Texas, so it’s not just Illinois. My theory is either hospitals and insurance companies scamming or something more sinister.

I don’t know if this has happened to people you know or anyone here experienced this and thinks that something’s up. Just wondering.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Eddystone
This might sound crazy but my gut feeling is that something crazy is going on.

Okay, so my wife gave birth to our daughter in 2022. It was her last appointment 2 weeks before the due date and her doc said that our baby girl’s not gonna grow in the womb anymore so they’re gonna induce the labor. It took 35 hours to get the dilation to 10cm and then my girl was out in 20 minutes. I thank God for that event not turning into a c-section.

Anyways, since then, five friends of ours had kids and every single one of them was either induced or c-section. And I keep hearing about the same thing happening to friends of friends. So, what in the fuck is going on? Out of those five friends, one’s in California and one’s in Texas, so it’s not just Illinois. My theory is either hospitals and insurance companies scamming or something more sinister.

I don’t know if this has happened to people you know or anyone here experienced this and thinks that something’s up. Just wondering.
Same thing…. 2015 induced on a Sunday at noon son was born by c section Tuesday at 5:30 pm.

Daughter born C section in 2019… my understanding once they have a c section that’s the only way it happens again?

My brothers 2 daughters same thing.

In Texas.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Smokeshot
Follow the money. It’s totally a money grab. If they induce early there’s a higher chance of a c section and once you go that way most can’t have a v-back in the future. They make more money on a c section. The insurance companies have so squeezed health care that your care is now predicated on how much money it makes the hospital, not on what’s best for the patient.
 
my understanding once they have a c section that’s the only way it happens again?
Your understanding is incorrect. Google “vaginal birth after c-section”. Or VBAC, if you like.


The reasons c-section births are so common are multitude but mostly revolve around parents wanting to have babies at a specific time, with a specific dr. attending, and docs that are under tremendous, and understandable pressure, to control the variables (most docs are owned by their hospital and and thusly accountable for their time and the resources used and natural births take more time) and ensure a positive outcome (measured by low infant and mother mortality rates). Sections are much less common at births attended by doulas or midwives and vary depending on which “academy” the doc is a member of, OB/GYN, family med, etc. Stanford and Harvard have done expensive studies on section rates and the factors involved… but they’re obviously just commies and should be defunded. Have the birth experience you voted for.
 
Your understanding is incorrect. Google “vaginal birth after c-section”. Or VBAC, if you like.


The reasons c-section births are so common are multitude but mostly revolve around parents wanting to have babies at a specific time, with a specific dr. attending, and docs that are under tremendous, and understandable pressure, to control the variables (most docs are owned by their hospital and and thusly accountable for their time and the resources used and natural births take more time) and ensure a positive outcome (measured by low infant and mother mortality rates). Sections are much less common at births attended by doulas or midwives and vary depending on which “academy” the doc is a member of, OB/GYN, family med, etc. Stanford and Harvard have done expensive studies on section rates and the factors involved… but they’re obviously just commies and should be defunded. Have the birth experience you voted for.
Like I said…. That was my understanding… not saying right or wrong. I didn’t vote for any type of experience… I got what I got. Have 2 healthy children and couldn’t be happier.

Just stating my experience.
 
It's rare to get sued for a C-section with a healthy baby. It's common to get sued and lose for a vaginal birth with any problem. If an ultrasound, or even physical exam, shows that fetal growth had stopped or that there is low amniotic fluid, most Obstetricians will at least induce labor if not do a C-se lction.
 
This might sound crazy but my gut feeling is that something crazy is going on.

Okay, so my wife gave birth to our daughter in 2022. It was her last appointment 2 weeks before the due date and her doc said that our baby girl’s not gonna grow in the womb anymore so they’re gonna induce the labor. It took 35 hours to get the dilation to 10cm and then my girl was out in 20 minutes. I thank God for that event not turning into a c-section.

Anyways, since then, five friends of ours had kids and every single one of them was either induced or c-section. And I keep hearing about the same thing happening to friends of friends. So, what in the fuck is going on? Out of those five friends, one’s in California and one’s in Texas, so it’s not just Illinois. My theory is either hospitals and insurance companies scamming or something more sinister.

I don’t know if this has happened to people you know or anyone here experienced this and thinks that something’s up. Just wondering.
Shantilla went to the toilet to take a shit. Had a baby instead. She named him Barack. She din even know she was pregnant👍
 
Fuck the '1st world' medical establishment. Women should give birth squatting, or on all 4's in a room lit by candles or equivalent color and Intensity lights like what we've been doing for thousands of years, oh and don't cut the umbilical cord. It's will detach itself naturally.... like what's been going on for thousands of years.

This lithotomy position (on back, legs up, going AGAINST gravity) is absolutely retarded and a product of the want of a King Louis XIV wanting to witness the birth. It was opposite what all the midwives were used to (squatting or all fours) up to that point.

Once workd got out that "the royals" were having baby's that way, then the commonfolk followed suit, because "omg the royals."

Fuck the royals.
 
Fuck the '1st world' medical establishment. Women should give birth squatting, or on all 4's in a room lit by candles or equivalent color and Intensity lights like what we've been doing for thousands of years, oh and don't cut the umbilical cord. It's will detach itself naturally.... like what's been going on for thousands of years.

This lithotomy position (on back, legs up, going AGAINST gravity) is absolutely retarded and a product of the want of a King Louis XIV wanting to witness the birth. It was opposite what all the midwives were used to (squatting or all fours) up to that point.

Once workd got out that "the royals" were having baby's that way, then the commonfolk followed suit, because "omg the royals."

Fuck the royals.
Women everywhere now love you😂😂😂😂👍
 
  • Like
Reactions: oneshot86
Same for DIL in 20, 23 and 24. All three were induced about two weeks early. Supposedly some condition she has. The last one was born around five AM. The doc delivered him, walked down the hall and delivered her best friend’s son…induced about two weeks early.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Smokeshot
Have you seen his hair? He's the short hair version of Fabio.
d2fd5603eee7cd7521a56cee2bc763dbca01b8d4r1-435-250_hq.gif
 
My father delivered all 5 kids at home in a dirt floor cabin with no electricity or running water in Homer Alaska, myself among them. People used to ask how they could do that, and he used to say "it's pretty simple really, you just kinda let it happen". They thought that hospitals were making a killing complicating a completely normal human process with drugs and surgeries, so they put their money where their mouths were.
 
This might sound crazy but my gut feeling is that something crazy is going on.

Okay, so my wife gave birth to our daughter in 2022. It was her last appointment 2 weeks before the due date and her doc said that our baby girl’s not gonna grow in the womb anymore so they’re gonna induce the labor. It took 35 hours to get the dilation to 10cm and then my girl was out in 20 minutes. I thank God for that event not turning into a c-section.

Anyways, since then, five friends of ours had kids and every single one of them was either induced or c-section. And I keep hearing about the same thing happening to friends of friends. So, what in the fuck is going on? Out of those five friends, one’s in California and one’s in Texas, so it’s not just Illinois. My theory is either hospitals and insurance companies scamming or something more sinister.

I don’t know if this has happened to people you know or anyone here experienced this and thinks that something’s up. Just wondering.
Sex is the problem, our coach told us if the kid is late get in their and tap it on the head, so we went a week late and finally the wife put me to work and one hour later her water broke., she did not want to be induced. Sometimes the old ways are the better ways.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: Smokeshot
My girls are 16 and 20, oldest was induced (at my wifes request because she was tired of being pregnant, on daughters due date), youngest was c-section because she was a massive baby, and she was breach anyway. At 35 weeks they did a sonogram and estimated her weight at just over 10lbs already, and at that point in the pregnancy they put on 1/2lb a week, so they were like "lets get this baby out before you split open", and they did, at 36 weeks. She was only 9lbs 3oz, and my wife was hella pissed.

I don't really know if there's something going on, I thought all the hollywood whores did c-section because they didn't want their front butts to look like arby's roast beef sammiches after pushing out kids. They needed it to be nice for the casting couch or something like that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Smokeshot
Early on a Thursday morning in March of 1964, my mother got up to get some orange juice to drink. While in the kitchen, she felt her water break. And then she could feel something sticking out down there.

She waddled back to the bedroom to wake up my father and asked him if he could see something like a leg or arm down there. Nope, it was tubular. My umbilical cord. And it was grey instead of purple. So, he got her into his Ford Galaxy 500 and got her to the hospital (Whitehead Memorial Hospital in Los Angeles, California.)

Her doctor was a big ole farmboy with a great sense of humor.

I was in the breach position and pressing on my own umbilical cord. He told to get on her hands and knees and stick her butt up on the air. She laughed, thinking he was being silly again. So, he picked up and turned her over and told her to stay that way.

So, I was born by c-section. Biblically, not born of woman.

Later, almost two years, my younger brother would be born, also by c-section. That was the predominant thinking then.

She was also pregnant between the two sons and miscarried. That one would have been a sister.

My mother would be plagued by scar tissue from the surgeries.
 
Your understanding is incorrect. Google “vaginal birth after c-section”. Or VBAC, if you like.


The reasons c-section births are so common are multitude but mostly revolve around parents wanting to have babies at a specific time, with a specific dr. attending, and docs that are under tremendous, and understandable pressure, to control the variables (most docs are owned by their hospital and and thusly accountable for their time and the resources used and natural births take more time) and ensure a positive outcome (measured by low infant and mother mortality rates). Sections are much less common at births attended by doulas or midwives and vary depending on which “academy” the doc is a member of, OB/GYN, family med, etc. Stanford and Harvard have done expensive studies on section rates and the factors involved… but they’re obviously just commies and should be defunded. Have the birth experience you voted for.
getting a "good" baby is one of the reasons,less risk/law suits if any risks. yea,more $s,easier to schedule,less work really,often less time. the lithotomy position lets the DR stay in a "superior" position. getting underneath for a "catch" makes them in an "inferior" position. ego matters.
i can tell you that c-section is not seen as a major surgical procedure by many. it damn sure is. dealt with several-usually obese multi parturient welfare queens. managing nipride and magnesium drips can be fun. bleeding can be a management problem. vigorous fundal massage on fresh abd wounds doesn't get much cooperation.
at 1 time regional blocks for delivery did lead to many sections. the block would slow the fetal heart to emergent levels. that led to emergency sections. long time ago. i don't know about things now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UKDslayer