Take on these groups and where to go from here(6.5CM)?

Bilc0

Private
Minuteman
Jan 22, 2018
7
1
I have this cross posted on the 65creedmoor forums and am trying to get as much input as possible before I sit down at the bench again in the next few days here. That po st can be found here: http://www.65creedmoor.com/index.php?topic=9701.0

I'm still having trouble finding a load that this barrel likes, I feel like I should be able to consistently get 0.5MOA or better out of it.
The first post I made with the load development for it can be found here:

http://www.65creedmoor.com/index.php?topic=9424.msg100795#msg100795

The excel spread sheet with groupings taken after 5.11.18 can be found here:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Y7GXfurnYqparltGcvGzbtlSHVQCAoQjy03_NYcJvs8/edit?usp=sharing

Since the first posting I made some additions to my reloading bench:

K&M VLD neck reamer: I noticed some copper dust around the inside of the neck where it met the bullet after seating ad the seating felt "stagey."

A&D FX-120i to rule out any powder variances from the RCBS charge master

Sinclair runout gauge - found the original rounds had anywhere from 1-2.5 thou R/O(runout) at neck and 2.5-5 thou R/O at ogive

K&M 0.0015 & 0.002 expanding mandrels - I found the neck run out seemed to be induced by the neck tension sizing process using a Redding bushing die. Now I currently use the bushing dies followed by these which seem to help(Should I just get a non bushing resizing die here now to further reduce runout?)

K&M Arbor press & Wilson inline die in attempt to reduce runout and seat consistently.

I was able to half the run out at the necks and ogive by half in most instances.


A member suggested I play with the seating depth a bit and during that loading session is when I noticed the copper jacket powder from the 45degree chamfer. I stopped half way through that loading session with only one increment up and went out and shot what I had loaded down the road.

The last session in the excel spreadsheets is with some berger Hybrids I was able to chase down and a 4 string shot from batch of 140gr eld-m over 42gr loaded with all the new toys. Out of about 25 loaded I got the following runout: 18 had less than 0.0015, 5 at 0.003, the rest between 0.004 and 0.005.

I'm shooting off a cadwell rock and have a nice protektor rear bag, gun recoils straight back and glides in the bag with ease.
I feel as if I am definitely getting back on the gun consistently between shots(I would just sit there and dry fire and practice doing so with each 2-4 hour range session), and have been giving the barrel 5-8 minutes to come back down to near ambient temp with a chamber chiller in the action.

The single digit ES/STD for some powder increments do not seem to always coincide with tight groups here so I find it hard to believe the fliers are me.

With all the data in the excel sheet here I am wonder what the nodes are and what I should try exploring with seating depth for the ELD-Ms and Bergers.

For the bergers 42.0 and 42.4 seem really promising and the 42.0gr group shot from the ELD-M batch with low runout seems good as well. Am I on the right track here and can anyone give any more insight?

Edit: it has been brought to my attention the embedded group pictures are not rendering for everyone, thr attached pdf should clear that up(or downloading and opening the file from Google drive).
 

Attachments

  • 5.11.18 140gr h4350 work up.pdf
    669.3 KB · Views: 41
Last edited:
.694 is not a bad group at all. Generally speaking, load development is a 3 day process for me. Day one is gross measurement changes .4 gr. Day 2 is minor .1gr. Day 3 is seating depth adjustment. I also shoot days 2 and 3 at 200 yards to open the groups up a bit for easier annalysis.

Not knowing you i would ask if youve tracked your velocities across a range of charge weights to identify differences and consistancies in you Averages and SDs to help identify your Optimal charge weight. once you know that its just a matter of reloading for precision and consistency.

Do you turn your necks?
Maybe try a different powder/primer combo?
I resize my brass and seat my bullets twice to help with the consistency and uniformity of those processes. (because some guy on youtube said it worked).

Best of luck to you
 
  • Like
Reactions: BlackFenix
.694 is not a bad group at all. Generally speaking, load development is a 3 day process for me. Day one is gross measurement changes .4 gr. Day 2 is minor .1gr. Day 3 is seating depth adjustment. I also shoot days 2 and 3 at 200 yards to open the groups up a bit for easier annalysis.

Not knowing you i would ask if youve tracked your velocities across a range of charge weights to identify differences and consistancies in you Averages and SDs to help identify your Optimal charge weight. once you know that its just a matter of reloading for precision and consistency.

Do you turn your necks?
Maybe try a different powder/primer combo?
I resize my brass and seat my bullets twice to help with the consistency and uniformity of those processes. (because some guy on youtube said it worked).

Best of luck to you

I would agree. I saw a huge difference when I moved from Winchester Large Primer and FGGM in my 308 load development.
 
The other thing that I thought was it may be that certain barrels don't like certain bullets and when you find the barrel bullet combination that works than you will know it. It is not Voodoo but close to it... ;-)
 
I turned all the lapua brass to take off the high spots. Using h4530 and cci small bench rest. I didn't anneal the virgin brass. This is the first firing for this brass.

What do you mean by resizing and seating the bullet twice?

The data in the excel sheet is all for 140gr ELD-Ms with the exception of the last outing which I am using 140gr berger hybrid targets. The last group from the outing on 7.27 was a retest of the 140gr eld-m over 42.0gr of 4350. Those shots I did not wait for the barrel to cool, probably running all 4 in less than 30s, they gave pretty good groups(you can see the shot to shot delta in the labradar data).

Are these groups for this powder and these two bullets too random to bother trying to play with seating depth and it's time for different bullets or different powder?
 
Last edited:
It has been brought to my attention the embedded group pictures are not rendering for everyone, the attached pdf should clear that up(or downloading and opening the file from Google drive). Each set of Chrono data should have a picture of the grouping now.
 

Attachments

  • 5.11.18 140gr h4350 work up.pdf
    669.3 KB · Views: 31
BlackFenix brings up a good point. Bullet choice is also very important. Additionally the lighter bullets usually stabilize faster and ultimately give better groups at shorter ranges. But because of there low BCs those groups will open up the further you go out. Thats why in high power matches, many shooters change their bullet weights as the match progresses and they get further out.