Testing three spotting scopes(Vortex and Meade)

Matteman

Private
Minuteman
Feb 27, 2021
14
18
Sweden
I have been looking for a good spotting scope for a while, but was unsure what to get. Today a few of the club members brought their spotting scopes to the range and i did a quick comparison. It should be said that all of the images were taken with my Iphone, and that they looked slightly better IRL. EU prices.

Meade Wilderness 20-60x80 320$, had a lot of chromatic aberration(blueish tint on sides of dark/white parts), small field of view, sharpness good in middle of image but gets soft too the edges, image a bit fish-eye distorted. Not very easy to see bullet holes in paper from 330 yards.

Vortex Diamondback 20-60x85 700$, better image, not so much chromatic aberration and better sharpness. Bullet holes can bee seen from 330 yards.

Vortex Razor 27-60x85 1900$, a lot better than the two others, but amlost three times as expensive as the diamondback. Much less chromatic aberration and the field of view is a lot wider. Bullet holes can be seen easily on new targets without too many stickers on them. Contrast is also better.

I hope this test is of use to someone woundering about what you get for your money when buying a spotting scope, its a big investment with the more expensive ones.

Spottingscope test2.png
 
Last edited:
Bottom pic says Razor 27-60, which is the newer version of this scope. The earlier model was 20-60.

BTW - Midway is currently selling the 20-60 version for $999, which is $600 off of list ... if you can live with the discontinued model.

OP - probably doesn't help you if you're in Europe.
 
You must be at least 18 years of age to use this site
You confirm that you are at least 18 years of age by continuing to use the site.