Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
neither. just stating who the patent you listed was filed byIs that good, bad, or potentially both?
You can get it here: https://patents.google.com/patent/USD943050S1/en?oq=OP,+D943050
It is a design patent, not a utility patent. He basically patented what the sight picture looks like through the scope, i.e. the patent examiner, esteemed Mojtaba Tehrani who grants 98% percent of patents he sees, is either a blithering imbecile or simply didn't look at it.
Here is the entirety of the claim: "The ornamental design for a gun sight reticle, as shown and described"
The examiner looked at this BDC reticle and completely ignored the fact that it is as different looking from many other BDC reticles as swiss cheese is from another block of swiss cheese.
ILya
In defense of their patent, I will provide my services to the honorable Quigley Ford pro bono, good sir!As always, a patent is only as good as your willingness and ability to enforce it. QF might be willing, but their actual ability is going to be lacking.
I respectfully request the thread change to how awesome chinese food is...if I may.Workers prepare to make the glass:
I love me some chinese food too.I respectfully request the thread change to how awesome chinese food is...if I may.
Because that looks awesome.
Or maybe i am just hungry.
Do you need a patent when your idea sucks enough no one will knock it off?
In this case, the idea is perfectly reasonable, it is the implementation and the presentation that are a little questionable.Do you need a patent when your idea sucks enough no one will knock it off?
There’s nothing inherently wrong with a FFP bdc scope like a Burris 2-10 veracity as long as you understand that past 400 yards the errors will start to compound but I mean for a short range less than 400 yards hunting role, its decent. It’s also generally a 300-400$ scope and not 2000$In this case, the idea is perfectly reasonable, it is the implementation and the presentation that are a little questionable.
There are dual focal plane scopes out there and have been for a while. There are BDC scopes out there and have been for a while. I am not a big BDC fan, but you can make them work.
It is the shamelessness and the gall that are annoying.
ILya
How I imagine @koshkin reacting to a QF scope that he discovers lounging atop one of his rifles.In this case, the idea is perfectly reasonable, it is the implementation and the presentation that are a little questionable.
There are dual focal plane scopes out there and have been for a while. There are BDC scopes out there and have been for a while. I am not a big BDC fan, but you can make them work.
It is the shamelessness and the gall that are annoying.
ILya
Well can you give even a limited review or test of the scope and some info like where they're made?No I am just/was a writer, reloader, shooter and hunter.
Yes, straight trade for a QF. Deal? Now where can I find these bad boys?Rocket Mountain Elk Foundation called, they said they'll take 100 of em to raffle off.
I will also be calling to order one. Fuck a Tangent, I need this beast on my rifle. @MNTC, you do refunds on them shit tier Tangents? Clearly this QF scope is far superior and for 40% less, is a no brainer.
/s
Deal, I'll be down that way tomorrow if you can secure me oneYes, straight trade for a QF. Deal? Now where can I find these bad boys?
Probably more like this...How I imagine @koshkin reacting to a QF scope that he discovers lounging atop one of his rifles.
View attachment 7883236
ILya is represented by the painting, of course…
I think…
I hope…
I pray…
What about LEOs who do concrete work on the side?! Double discount?Is there a mil, leo, or concrete worker discount?
No I am just/was a writer, reloader, shooter and hunter.
Retired now but I think Long Range Hunting still has a couple articles.Who do you write for?
Who do you write for?
Who do you write for?
Retired now but I think Long Range Hunting still has a couple articles.
That reticle looks amazing for shooting in the wind.
Are you with the prestigious law firm of Dewey, Screwem, and Howe?In defense of their patent, I will provide my services to the honorable Quigley Ford pro bono, good sir!
-
Montgomery Shambels VI, Barrister ESQ.
Man, I started reading this thread again, and I just snotted and woke my wife up with this post. Again…..FFS.......
Dear 8 pound 6 ounce newborn infant Jesus......
.
look at the reticles, 'features' and claims. then the price tagI've read the Buddly thread a couple years ago and seen QF mentioned mockingly for years but does anyone have a rundown of what the story is behind these? Just some scam artist who re-brands Chinese OEM scopes and up-sells them as premium?
Oh no no I get all that lol. And I recognize the scope bodies as being a Chinese OEMs just from the turret tower assembly. I've just been wondering if anyone knew the full story on the company.look at the reticles, 'features' and claims. then the price tag
aside from the whole putting a custom BDC to 1k yards and saying it's better than dialing thing
They are the overpriced "school fundraising" candy bar/scented candle/cookie batter of the scope world.Oh no no I get all that lol. And I recognize the scope bodies as being a Chinese OEMs just from the turret tower assembly. I've just been wondering if anyone knew the full story on the company.