How do people not know about cheddarwursts? I literally have 3 different brands in my freezer. Two jalapeno cheddar and a white cheddar variety. Sometimes I forget how sad the food scene is outside of Wisconsin.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Wisconsin has an epic cheese game. That’s something I miss about growing up in northern ILHow do people not know about cheddarwursts? I literally have 3 different brands in my freezer. Two jalapeno cheddar and a white cheddar variety. Sometimes I forget how sad the food scene is outside of Wisconsin.
Like by itself, or all together? No pizza? What about lasagna?Fun fact: I dislike cheese and only suffer it to be polite
Yankee food.How do people not know about cheddarwursts? I literally have 3 different brands in my freezer. Two jalapeno cheddar and a white cheddar variety. Sometimes I forget how sad the food scene is outside of Wisconsin.
How do people not know about cheddarwursts? I literally have 3 different brands in my freezer. Two jalapeno cheddar and a white cheddar variety. Sometimes I forget how sad the food scene is outside of Wisconsin.
Too bad, the Salmon in Alaska is awesome!I absolutely hate fish too and just tell people I am allergic to avoid it
Smoked boudin and regular, both are good!Yankee food.
We have da boudin down here.![]()
Good. More for meLOL, I would not eat that shit.
I hope people 'edumacate' that writer"High BC bullets might be important for long-range shooting, but they’re not the only thing that matters. Velocity—just as it always has been and always will be—is important, too. For example, 6.5 Creedmoor is generally touted as being a better long-range cartridge than the .260 Rem., even though the .260 Rem. has more powder capacity and can push bullets faster. The reason for this is that factory rifles for the Creedmoor are built with a 1:8-inch twist as opposed to the 1:9-inch rifling twist of the .260. Because of this, factory Creedmoor ammo can be loaded with higher BC bullets."
And the entire article..... https://www.shootingillustrated.com...l&utm_campaign=020223email&utm_id=020223email
Yeah my reason for the thread was his logic. But it turned in a 6.5cm vs thing, not my intention.I hope people 'edumacate' that writer
that's because the 'adults' here can't control themselves and act like 5yr olds lololololYeah my reason for the thread was his logic. But it turned in a 6.5cm vs thing, not my intention.
It is "The Bear Pit"!that's because the 'adults' here can't control themselves and act like 5yr olds lolololol
Uh, you’re not new here so you must be lost. Let’s find you a hall monitor to get you to the proper subforumthat's because the 'adults' here can't control themselves and act like 5yr olds lolololol
lol well playedUh, you’re not new here so you must be lost. Let’s find you a hall monitor to get you to the proper subforum
Don't forget the boudin balls.Smoked boudin and regular, both are good!
That's written as is Rumsfeld wrote it...you know..."There are known knowns, things we know that we know; and there are known unknowns, things that we know we don't know. But there are also unknown unknowns, things we do not know we don't know.""High BC bullets might be important for long-range shooting, but they’re not the only thing that matters. Velocity—just as it always has been and always will be—is important, too. For example, 6.5 Creedmoor is generally touted as being a better long-range cartridge than the .260 Rem., even though the .260 Rem. has more powder capacity and can push bullets faster. The reason for this is that factory rifles for the Creedmoor are built with a 1:8-inch twist as opposed to the 1:9-inch rifling twist of the .260. Because of this, factory Creedmoor ammo can be loaded with higher BC bullets."
And the entire article..... https://www.shootingillustrated.com...l&utm_campaign=020223email&utm_id=020223email
Back before this PRS thing, back before the cheapskate lazies ruined innovation with stupid speed limits, back before Creedmore was a must have name at the end of every type of caliber, back before 30 pound rifles shooting light cartridges, folks in competitions were running custom chambered .243 rifles, shooting 105gr or similar rounds, loaded hot at over 3k fps to sometimes a fair bit over 3k fps and doing very well with them.
.243 Winchester is still my favorite cartridge. 107 SMK over a case full of retumbo in a 26 inch barrel. H4831SC for the 24 inch barrels.
A well built accurate large frame MSR platform rifle in .243 can also be pretty sweet.
Still using my Stiller action. A good action never goes out of style. Though the current trend has been tight smooth nitrided actions/bolts. I’ve never ever had a hitch or hiccup with the Stiller, over many, many barrels and all kinds of conditions.My .243’s are heavy. 1 is built on a FN SPR, and one is my old F-Class gun built on a Stiller action from 2012.
Id get multiple barrels chambered at the same time from the reamer I purchased. Sent the gunsmith a new reamer every time it was time to do a batch of barrels.
Normally Obermeyer barrels, but my last batch of barrels are Schneider barrels. 7.5 twist.
Don’t shoot as much anymore.
Still using my Stiller action. A good action never goes out of style. Though the current trend has been tight smooth nitrided actions/bolts. I’ve never ever had a hitch or hiccup with the Stiller, over many, many barrels and all kinds of conditions.
Well, I’m a cheap ass shooting mid velocity rounds and stretching barrels to 3500-4500 rounds, but still through 4 barrels myself and this was a used comp action when I bought it.Same here. My stiller has been through 8 burnt barrels. Not a high round count though since I’d usually end up rebarreling between 800-1,000 rds when accuracy fell off.
I knew you were short, I didn’t know you were a baby.all the above
I hate it on all of that stuff but eat all of that stuff because I have too
I knew you were short, I didn’t know you were a baby.
Do not tell him something like that!
Bend it like Bender!
Well, I’m a cheap ass shooting mid velocity rounds and stretching barrels to 3500-4500 rounds, but still through 4 barrels myself and this was a used comp action when I bought it.
Came here to say this.It's funny how many times they have tried to reinvent the 6.5×52mm Carcano. 130 years old and designed for long bullets. You'd think now that we know JFK was smoked by a 221 fireball from an xp100, it would be time for a resurgence of the 6.5 Italian round.
Came here to say this.
After all, All roads lead to Rome.
Fun fact: I dislike cheese and only suffer it to be polite
Pepper jack housing balls at Best Stop. MmmmmmmmmmmmmmmDon't forget the boudin balls.![]()
Is that The Best Stop in Breaux Bridge? I think I’ve been there, but it’s been a few years.Pepper jack housing balls at Best Stop. Mmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
I love the venerable .243..243 Winchester is still my favorite cartridge. 107 SMK over a case full of retumbo in a 26 inch barrel. H4831SC for the 20 to 24 inch barrels.
Off I-10 by Scott. And Boudin balls, not housing. Stupid auto correct.Is that The Best Stop in Breaux Bridge? I think I’ve been there, but it’s been a few years.
I like to stop at Prejean’s in Lafayette.![]()
That seems to be the trend. It's easier to "invent" a new cartridge using the latest bullet technology and optimized twist than it is to get the average person to understand the benefits of using them. Comparing the cartridges based on the decisions of rifle manufactures is intellectually dishonest, but I guess it gets clicks.Not a thing wrong with the 243, if anything it was the gun manufacturers and not the bullet side that limited it.
They twisted it wrong, if you long range twist it like any other 6mm its not much different than a 6CM
Doesn't 243 suffer from magazine length problems when using high BC bullets like the 115's? I'm pretty sure that was the reason Tubb invented the 6XC, so the bullet could be seated above the neck shoulder junction without OAL preventing use of magazines. Or do cartridges with steeper shoulder angles like 243 and 260 not suffer from donut problems?Not a thing wrong with the 243, if anything it was the gun manufacturers and not the bullet side that limited it.
They twisted it wrong, if you long range twist it like any other 6mm its not much different than a 6CM
Doesn't 243 suffer from magazine length problems when using high BC bullets like the 115's? I'm pretty sure that was the reason Tubb invented the 6XC, so the bullet could be seated above the neck shoulder junction without OAL preventing use of magazines. Or do cartridges with steeper shoulder angles like 243 and 260 not suffer from donut problems?
I disagree, unless you start reaming them. The whole point is to be able to seat the entire bullet in the neck above the neck-shoulder junction where the donut forms. If your brass is like 243 with long sloping shoulders, that junction is further from the case head. Seat the bullet above that point, and you have an OAL that exceeds what a standard AI mag can handle, right?Case neck donuts are a different issue than seating length.
I disagree, unless you start reaming them. The whole point is to be able to seat the entire bullet in the neck above the neck-shoulder junction where the donut forms. If your brass is like 243 with long sloping shoulders, that junction is further from the case head. Seat the bullet above that point, and you have an OAL that exceeds what a standard AI mag can handle, right?