I expected that to be your response. It is a one note song.I’ll waste just enough time responding to this stupidity to say I’m not going to waste any time responding to this stupidity.![]()
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I expected that to be your response. It is a one note song.I’ll waste just enough time responding to this stupidity to say I’m not going to waste any time responding to this stupidity.![]()
What can I say to a man that believes government violence should be utilized at all times and for everything including how close to the store some old bastard can park.I expected that to be your response. It is a one note song.
Trust me, and I do mean this from the bottom of my heart, the few moment it took to respond to you are precious time that I will never recover.What can I say to a man that believes government violence should be utilized at all times and for everything including how close to the store some old bastard can park.
I don’t like that you are a big gov’t supporter/advocate. I don’t like that you defend authoritarianism every chance you get. I don’t like that you devolve conversation just as you did in this case from either dishonesty and/or low level intelligence. The side you align with every time is the side that wants to and is doing harm to me and mine. I don’t like you at all. What more do I need to say?
That's a sweet story for someone that has never served .This is quite possibly the dumbest thing posted on the hide ever.
WE get it you hate police with a serious unhealthy mental condition. The fact that you fail to recognize the role that politicians and prosecutors play in this is laughable.
You think I'm gonna sell out my friends and family because of their job? Guys who I helped bury the bodies. People who have gone to war with me.
Guys who are 100X the man you'll ever be?
Yeah dumbest post ever.
Nobody has said completely abandon some sort of security force, this is a weak straw man argument.If we get rid of police, how do we handle the day to day problems like that? If we don't, it seems to me that this then becomes a neverending tribal war.
That is almost an answer. So, how do you pay for the security force? They will be busy protecting you and not have time to grow corn or potatoes.Nobody has said completely abandon some sort of security force, this is a weak straw man argument.
The argument is that “the police” cannot be funded by stolen tax money.
Answer the question, please.Are you telling me there is no option other than 0 police....or overly militarized police state where every violation of the law could technically lead to you being shot?... absolutely nothing in between?
Contrary to what you think.....most of us here don't actually want 0 govt and 0 police.
We just have the crazy notion that we are more entitled to our paychecks than the pedo crackheads in our govt......that we should be able to build a deck on our houses without needing a permit......and that we should be able to own guns without fear of G-men kicking down our doors and shooting our dogs in the middle of the night.
There doesn't need to be a law for everything that inconveniences us
The police don't need to be involved in every dispute
And there is 0 reason cops should have more rights than your average citizen.
If a cop can drive down a highway in a car with limo tints and a M16....why it it a crime when i do it?
...and alright fine....you want to argue they need those abilities to do their jobs....sure, ill agree with that for arguments sake.
But why are they allowed to carry across state lines while I'm not?
More importantly, why are RETIRED police allowed to carry across state lines?
You cant have a country where "all men are created equal" ...then pull rights away from anyone who doesn't serve the crown.....and expect that not to lead to resentment, especially when it's the kings men who are all too happy to enforce those laws.
That is almost an answer. So, how do you pay for the security force? They will be busy protecting you and not have time to grow corn or potatoes.
And you say security force. Would that not involve transportation that is identifiable? Clothing to tell them apart from bad guys? And how do they protect? With guns? Should they have a set of rules to work by?
So, everyone pays in a neighborhood and to be legitimately fair, no one gets a free ride, all have to pay. So, if it is compulsory, is it not like a tax?How do you pay for any goods or services that you want?
I’m using “police” and “security force” interchangeably. Technically they’re the same, or they should be. The actual difference is how they are funded. A private police force contract could be divided and funded hundreds of ways. No matter how many I list there are still numerous creative ways to do it
There are plenty of articles about neighborhoods, towns, or cities that have implemented some sort of system like this. There are also plenty of articles about how and why it works better than a state run system. I’ll link to just one individual story
Private Security: Policing at Half the Cost | Mises Institute
KHOU reports that a Houston subdivision has hired private security to replace government police. The result? Half the crime for half the cost. And while it’smises.org
And I’ll also link to a list of search results of different articles.
Mises Search | Mises Institute
mises.org
There are answers to all of your questions on this list. All you need to do is be curious and honest enough to start reading
It is only compulsory if it’s contractually obligated.So, everyone pays in a neighborhood and to be legitimately fair, no one gets a free ride, all have to pay. So, if it is compulsory, is it not like a tax?
THis should work great on the commune.It is only compulsory if it’s contractually obligated.
This argument is common as well, it’s called the “free rider” problem. To some degree it can’t be avoided no matter what
I was going to say that it reminds me of the young people who think that communism works, it just has not been implemented correctly until they came along.THis should work great on the commune.![]()
So, you have a police force with uniforms, codes of conduct, rules for them to enforce and it is paid for, quite fairly, by a no free ride clause. (Ass, gas, or grass, no one rides for free.)It is only compulsory if it’s contractually obligated.
This argument is common as well, it’s called the “free rider” problem. To some degree it can’t be avoided no matter what
The thing you’re overlooking is there will be no public union to act as a political arm of any certain party or protect shitbag cops. Something else that can be possible would be holding individual people accountable for any negligent behavior.So, you have a police force with uniforms, codes of conduct, rules for them to enforce and it is paid for, quite fairly, by a no free ride clause. (Ass, gas, or grass, no one rides for free.)
Sounds like re-inventing the wheel. But thank you for being honest and answering directly. Seriously, that is admirable, even if a compliment from me means nothing.
Public union or HOA or board of directors, either way, we have a power structure to hold accountable. So, I don't see it as all that different.The thing you’re overlooking is there will be no public union to act as a political arm of any certain party or protect shitbag cops. Something else that can be possible would be holding individual people accountable for any negligent behavior.
And I can already hear an objection to that last sentence so here’s the rebuttal
Yes, I’m sure there will be cops(whatever you want to call them in my fantasy, freedom-centered scenario) that have complaints levied towards them. They may actually be shitbags or they may just get caught up in the moment. But whatever the scenario, it will be up to the business and its customers who ultimately deal with the problem. This could mean this cop who is a tad too energetic getting fired. But it could also mean he gets sent to a shittier part of town that may need a little heavier hand. The takeaway is that it will be dealt with quicker and more efficiently than a public union could ever dream of
Aye, there be danger. Danger everywherePublic union or HOA or board of directors, either way, we have a power structure to hold accountable. So, I don't see it as all that different.
Who decides what security company to use? How are those people held accountable? Or the person or persons who made the decision to hire them? It's not that the institution of government is corrupt, per se. It is the humans who are corrupt. Never underestimate the tendency of a human to be a bag of shit.
So, you take away political elected institutions and supplant it with "corporate" style leadership.
To me, it is the same song, second verse, terse as the first.
You are going to have shitbags in your scenario and it will be just as hard to get rid of them.
How big is a group. Are we talking cities? Or neighborhoods? And how do the neighborhoods cooperate? Or not? It's like the magic scene where one person goes fractal and now you have a thousand of them?
The danger of a dictatorship is the idea that one guy is smarter than a lot of people.
The danger of democracy is the idea that a million people are smarter than one.
There be danger. Democracy is a bad form of government and yet it's crappiness is superceded by all other forms of government.
And a board of directors or HOA or however the citizens interact in your scenario is still a form of government. And there will be corruption and handshake deals. There will be wars and rumors of wars. It is what humans do, the nature of the beast.
It's the same on bases, the worst of which I've found in the medfac parking lot.... MED/CC and Base Chrome Chicken parking is closer than the Expecting Mother spotsGovern me harder
I'm special and I need special treatment so I will get the government to provide it for me and those like me.
The government standing there like a used car salesman with a big smile and rubbing his hands seeing the next sucker walking on his lot.
Walk around your local courthouse and see if it is like the ones around me. The handicap parking is further from the door than the judges reserved parking and the on duty police reserved parking. Hmmm, wonder why that is?