When asked about gun ban shit:
"Thank you for contacting me about gun safety in our country. I appreciate you taking the time to share your thoughts with me.
Over the years that I’ve been honored to serve as your representative, I’ve gotten calls and emails on this issue more than perhaps any other. I’ve heard from responsible, law-abiding folks who follow the laws and own guns for sport, hunting, hobby, or home protection. And I’ve heard from folks who are heartbroken after a tragedy has occurred or who have been personally affected by a shooting. I respect all of those perspectives. Like most folks in our area, I don’t support legislation that would take away guns from law-abiding citizens or infringe on their Second Amendment right to own and buy firearms. I am a strong supporter of the Second Amendment and understand that the vast majority of gun owners follow the laws.
There are common-sense steps Congress could take to address the problem of gun violence that respect the Second Amendment rights of law-abiding Americans. Recently, the House of Representatives took up such legislation, the Bipartisan Background Checks Act (
H.R. 8) and the Enhanced Background Checks Act (
H.R. 1446). In my view, this legislation – which is consistent with current law in our state as passed by the voters via initiative – doesn’t impede the rights of responsible gun owners but can make it harder for felons and those with a serious mental illness to acquire a weapon.
Ultimately, everyone agrees that we want to live in safe communities where we don’t have to fear going to concerts, or malls, or church, or movies, or school, or work. I am hopeful that our country will continue to engage in a constructive and respectful conversation on this issue.
I encourage you to continue to share your views with me on this topic or any other issue. Thank you for reaching out. I am honored to serve as your representative."
So what do you all make of it? Placating? I don't agree and my reply centered on "So then, when does it stop?" with a promise to follow up. In fact, I'm gonna step it up --I'm going to make appointments to visit them in their office. A visit is worth more than ten thousand letters and a thousand phone calls I understand.
He's right in that neither of these bills will much affect WA sales --we already got stuck with that over the initiative (which was numbered confusingly next to a no tax on groceries and antis were able to get signatures for one initiative by selling it as the other --when that came to light, oops! "But we're not fixing it"; bullshit).
I somehow doubt this will be all he votes on, I noticed he didn't mention Frankenfeinstein's bill, which passed the senate of course.
What do you guys think? Discuss away.
But please, write these bastards. If for no other reason than to say you did all you could in the event this goes south, which it looks like they're hellbent on doing.