Thomas Hardimann for the Supreme Court...YES!

Somebody has gotten you all mixed up with their modern philosophy and excusing away criminals.
They have been pumping out this idea of propaganda for a long time.
This is what comes from when you try to re-invent the basis of right and wrong to suit a SJW agenda.

Religion did a decent job thousands of years ago under Moses of explaining the difference and providing examples.
The Mosaic law has very strict respect for "the circle of life" (which like so much of the religion has been turned into a lawyers joke as if an omnipotent being would be impressed with loopholes people create for themselves). It also had no problems eliminating those who proved unworthy to be in society. Nor was there any issue when a group was considered bad enough to erase completely.

The simple way goes:
Everybody gets a chance to be born and try to become a decent human, your lease on life begins at conception
(sometimes you don't make it past the initial stages due to problems and that's just tough no guarantees you won't get culled by nature / accidents. The body itself culls out many anomalies without intervention)
God despises abortion and baby killing (which has existed for thousands of years) because killing the innocent without a chance is an affront to the circle of life & ultimately a selfish act, killing an innocent being of your own species for your own comfort or convenience when they caused you no harm.

That being very different from once you have the ability to think and understand your actions.
"Child" or Adult it didn't matter, death penalty for anyone and everyone who was evil.
(If you are a kid and kill your classmate on purpose or rape them... junior sized rock concert).
The laws were simple, very few and strict, don't do xxx and you won't die.. Do xxx and you get a rock concert in your honour.
If you turn out to be evil, it is the duty of everyone to put a permanent stop to your evil ways, so no questions about it, end of story, try again next life, we aren't going to let you mess up things for others.
If a whole area or group turns out way too evil, time to sterilize the area and keep the evil contagion from spreading.

Part of the problem today is that the "state" or "Justice system" hides people and protects them when they knowingly carry out miscarriages of justice. Previously everybody involved could be held accountable from lying witnesses, to evil prosecutors, to corrupt judges, to evil prison guards and wardens. Then they gave themselves blanket immunity that nobody said no to and now they don't worry... if they mess up they'll just pay off somebody with the tax money of their family and neighbors. Now if in a miscarriage of justice every single person involved was criminally and civilly responsible and the family or extended family group of the wronged / killed person had the right to seek vengeance, people would be a lot more careful.

It's kind of simple in the end:
Babies deserve their chance at life because that's how it is supposed to be.
If you prove evil to others and a danger to others in a significant and uncorrectable way, you get booted from the game permanently.
If you say somebody is going to prison for life, then you must enslave somebody else to pay for it, how is that fair to the others?
Now if you can send them on a 1 way ticket to a different planet all by themselves or dimension for just them... no problem we'll update policies once you get that capability built.
Stellar post.
 
36937317_1942981449111407_4443477060253384704_n.jpg
 
In 2011 he penned a 52-fucking-page dissent fuck you when the appeals court, by a 2-1 vote, upheld a District of Columbia ordinance that prohibited semiautomatic rifles and magazines holding more than 10 rounds. The judges in the majority, both Republican appointees, noted that several large states, including California and New York, enforced similar laws.

But Kavanaugh said the ban on semiautomatic rifles was unconstitutional because the weapons are in common use in this country. He wrote:

"As one who was born here, grew up in this community in the late 1960s, 1970s and 1980s, and has lived and worked in this area almost all of his life, I am acutely aware of the gun, drug and gang violence that has plagued all of us…. But our task is to apply the Constitution and the precedents of the Supreme Court, regardless of whether the result is one we agree with as a matter of first principles or policy,”.

https://www.nationalreview.com/bench-memos/judge-kavanaughs-record-on-second-amendment-gun-rights/
 
Then Buh hired him, and he clerked for Kennedy, and worked for Kagan, that dissent was just a front to get to where he can do the most damage.

This is how insidious Ivy League commies are.

There you go again, W also appointed Hardiman. So if Hardiman is out (and probably every decent candidate after you napalmed pretty much the whole field), who the fuck is left?
 
Im thankful the dumbass republicans finely decided they need to vet these justices for what they believe. We're playing catchup in that regard. Dumbasses...
 
No ivy leaguers, they are toxic anti Constitutionalists. They are 1% of the JD holders yet make up way too many on the court, and the court has been reflecting the indoctrination of those leftist institutions. Better off doing a raffle with all the state schools, hell random joe blows would work better too.

There you go again, W also appointed Hardiman. So if Hardiman is out (and probably every decent candidate after you napalmed pretty much the whole field), who the fuck is left?
 
No ivy leaguers, they are toxic anti Constitutionalists. They are 1% of the JD holders yet make up way too many on the court, and the court has been reflecting the indoctrination of those leftist institutions. Better off doing a raffle with all the state schools, hell random joe blows would work better too.

Raffle and random. No two words better capture the degree of solemnity with which you regard the entire topic.