Re: Torque Tool for Scope Rings
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: kortik</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: 77Bronc</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I want to order either a or Wheeler Engineering torque wrench/driver...Which one do you think is the best and more accurate.
I have a Seekonk for my LMT MRP barrel and its built like a tank, and I use it very often, will not use the one for the rings often, so I cant really justify a 15 and 30 in-lbs individual wrenches from Seekonk for minimal use.
77 </div></div>
Any mechanical type fixed (or pre-set) torque tool is always more accurate than the mechanical adjustable one, assuming that adjustment is done correctly. This applies to Seekonk, Mountz, Borka preset torque tools, which are actually adjusted to specs and do not rely on theoretical spring load/deflection relationship. Fixed torque tools are also always more repeatable and consistent, because there is no adjustment scale for dynamic adjustment by the user, and user adjustment error is eliminated as a matter of principle. Some adjustable torque tools are better than the others, but unless you take such tool and check it with the torque meter, there is no way to be sure that actual torque tool output matches adjustment scale values. In addition, spring has certain limitations, and does not typically has linear load output proportional to spring deflection from 0 to solid height. When I came to understanding of this limitation of the adjustable torque tools when compared to fixed torque tools, I've developed my multi torque driver, which is fixed type torque driver, adjusted to exact specs only once during production. I also started checking every one of my imported ATD-1080 adjustable torque screwdrivers on torque meter prior to shipping them to the customers, to elimite the ones which were out of specs. On the other hand, I would say that adjustable torque tools with electronic scale and load cells are probably highly accurate, but very expensive. Just be aware that mechanical, spring based tools like HF 20-200 inch-lbs. ones for $20 are very likely off the scale quite a bit at the low and high end of the scale. I have my doubts that any responsible spring manufacturer can claim to be able to mass produce a compression spring having linear load characteristics in such wide range. So, I would certainly not use $20 torque tool with 1-to-10 adjustment ratio for anything like scope rings.
</div></div>
Well put and I agree, that is why I have a $160 Seekonk dedicated to 140 in-lbs for my LMT MRP uppers/barrels, it is much easier/cheaper than drilling out a broken stud in an expensive upper.
I am a mechanical engineer and I work with machinery that requires very precise assembly and torquing for reliable operation. The Borka is a very simple design that requires an exact placement of the fingers for the spring to break in the handle, from what I can see. It is a simple F x D mechanism and for my limited use, I feel will do the job. In the long run, if I was doing this daily, I would have a collection of Seekonks on my bench
Once again thanks for the replies
77