Ffp is dumb in this scope. Hope there’s a 2fp version
I too am not fussed on FFP below 10x (even up to 15x I can live with).
I personally don't see any situations that I'll be holding in the reticle and would he on anything other than max magnification.
A typical LVPO is arguably used 99% of the time on min or max magnification, a 2-10x roughly falls into that category also.
For quick up close shooting you will be on very low magnification and won't be doing any holds (FFP won't be able to see the holds anyway) and more extended ranges 100yards+ you will more than likely be on max magnification.
In 22lr practical matches I'll use less than 10x at 100yards and FFP has been useful, but we are usually talking comparatively small targets, much smaller than a person or game animal which is what most of these scopes will be used for.
On the other hand if the reticle is designed properly the illuminated dot should make up the short comings of FFP at lower magnifications.
I think there's a case to be made for both SFP and FFP in this style of scope, but manufacturers seem to cock it up both ways.
They'll put a thin reticle in FFP that's almost useless on minimum magnification or they won't put a killing reticle in a SFP scope and only offer a standard duplex.
I'm hoping that the Gen 3 Razor 1-10 gets the reticle right and forces some change in this space, as it seems to be a gripe many people have.
