I hear a lot of people using a Slik 700DX and I'm wondering if that isn't awfully heavy? I've got a PRST tripod ([video]http://stores.hogsaddle.com/prst-carbon-fiber-tripod/[/video]) that I use with my Hog Saddle that only weighs 4.1 pounds, bare, plus the weight of the ball head and saddle (3.4lbs) and it's not something I'd want to carry into the back country. The Slik 700DX is heavier. Also, they both seem pretty bulky. Wouldn't something really light, say 2.5-3lbs be better for holding a spotting scope while scouting/hunting?
I've been using a Meopta 65mm on a BogPod tripod for years and it's been OK. Very easy to carry and if I broke it, no big deal - they're cheap. I just ordered a Swarovski ATX 85mm, though, and I'm considering buying a new/better tripod. Is it a stability issue that leads people to use these bigger heavier tripods?
There are often times where I'm actually using 2 tripods these days - my PRST for my rifle and (currently) my BogPod for my scope. This way I can sit on the ground and watch a giant oat field or a 800yd sendero (wide Ranch Road for non-Texans, lol!). This way I can run both with very little movement. I'd rather not have to switch out my rifle and the spotter on a single tripod in situations like this - the movement is too risky and potentially to loud. Besides, if an animal is moving and you need to shoot quickly, the time lost could mean an opportunity lost.
Has anyone tried the something like the Slik Lite CF-422? [video]https://slikusa.com/product/lite-cf-422/[/video] 2.3lbs carbon fiber with a 6.6lb weight rating and a minimum height of 8" (great for prone shooting) and a max of 70". I'm thinking a bungee cord to a pack or a tent stake would keep it plenty stable.
Thoughts?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk