I will say this is not my expertise so I will rely on you to break down the actual crime that was committed.
Not a part of the machine.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I will say this is not my expertise so I will rely on you to break down the actual crime that was committed.
It's not mine either, just READ THE FUCKING INDICTMENT instead. They lay it out pretty clearly.I will say this is not my expertise so I will rely on you to break down the actual crime that was committed.
He just did.I will say this is not my expertise so I will rely on you to break down the actual crime that was committed.
Guiliani, Sidney Wood, John Eastman, Jeffrey Clark, maybe Jenna Ellis...?
Rudy Giuliani – Co-conspirator 1, an attorney who was willing to spread knowingly false claims and pursue strategies that the Defendant’s 2020 re-election campaign attorneys would not
John Eastman – Co-conspirator 2, an attorney who devised and attempted to implement a strategy to leverage the Vice President’s ceremonial role overseeing the certification proceeding to obstruct the certification of the presidential election.
Sidney Powell – Co-conspirator 3, an attorney whose unfounded claims of election fraud the Defendant privately acknowledged to others sounded “crazy.” Nonetheless, the Defendant embraced and publicly amplified Co-Conspirator 3’s disinformation
Jeffrey Clark – Co-conspirator 4, a Justice Department official who worked on civil matters and who, with the Defendant, attempted to use the Justice Department to open sham election crime investigations and influence state legislatures with knowingly false claims of election fraud.
Kenneth Chesebro – Co-conspirator 5, an attorney who assisted in devising and attempting to implement a plan to submit fraudulent sales of presidential electors to obstruct the certification proceeding.
Co-conspirator 6, a political consultant who helped implement a plan to submit fraudulent slates of presidential electors to obstruct the certification proceeding.
Point to the part of this doll where he hurt your feels.You guy’s whining about this rigged or that was rigged, this is because of Hunter, give me a break. You sound like millennials. Seriously. Trump is a blow hard and you guys continue to support it. He was spoiled by his daddy, dodged the draft and continues to act like he is above the law. Fucking move on people.
It’s like trying to spoon feed a fucking baby. This is the problem right here. You people are too stupid and fucking lazy to review the facts and charges and so just jump to ‘oh, it’s the swamp, it’s the deep state!’It's not mine either, just READ THE FUCKING INDICTMENT instead. They lay it out pretty clearly.
Id rather do more important things like take the trash out ... No point in reading it.. it has no substance.. Just like the rest of them..It's not mine either, just READ THE FUCKING INDICTMENT instead. They lay it out pretty clearly.
You guy’s whining about this rigged or that was rigged, this is because of Hunter, give me a break. You sound like millennials. Seriously. Trump is a blow hard and you guys continue to support it. He was spoiled by his daddy, dodged the draft and continues to act like he is above the law. Fucking move on people.
You guy’s whining about this rigged or that was rigged, this is because of Hunter, give me a break. You sound like millennials. Seriously. Trump is a blow hard and you guys continue to support it. He was spoiled by his daddy, dodged the draft and continues to act like he is above the law. Fucking move on people.
Id rather do more important things like take the trash out ... No point in reading it.. it has no substance.. Just like the rest of them..
Now if you can Break down your Expert Opinion on the laws supposedly broken? Obviously you are in the Know.... You read it..
Thanks
He’s going to laugh at you thinking you misspelled chief…The head in the sand approach is...<chef's kiss>
I'd rather only property be allowed to vote.It’s like trying to spoon feed a fucking baby. This is the problem right here. You people are too stupid and fucking lazy to review the facts and charges and so just jump to ‘oh, it’s the swamp, it’s the deep state!’
That there is no IQ test for the right to vote is a crime…
Think that one through a little. Bill Gates owns most of Idaho. You good with that?I'd rather only property be allowed to vote.
No head in the ground... Just understand whats going on is all.. All this comes too is to keep him from running.. Plain and simple... WHen you have a corrupt system its not hard to get the things done you need too.. Same with the Classified docs case... Its already been settled in court... Whatever happened to that nuclear secrets he was keeping... Came down to Papers with govt titles on them is all.. Again no substance but most would never know as all they hear is ....Ohhh Trump Indicted.. Russia Russia Russia... WHatever..The head in the sand approach is...<chef's kiss>
That gives him 1 vote.Think that one through a little. Bill Gates owns most of Idaho. You good with that?
Seems to happen... Is Hillary right?
They had pictures of BOXES AND BOXES!!! [/sarcasm] In reality wasn't it about 125 pages total for Trump? However, O'biden actually had BOXES AND BOXES, in multiple non-secure locations.No head in the ground... Just understand whats going on is all.. All this comes too is to keep him from running.. Plain and simple... WHen you have a corrupt system its not hard to get the things done you need too.. Same with the Classified docs case... Its already been settled in court... Whatever happened to that nuclear secrets he was keeping... Came down to Papers with govt titles on them is all.. Again no substance but most would never know as all they hear is ....Ohhh Trump Indicted.. Russia Russia Russia... WHatever..
Does all the big copy and paste take the edge off your TDS?Sounds like a lazy bad faith argument to me, but ok I'll show you the answers in the indictment....
View attachment 8195450
View attachment 8195451
So that's the basic part: he knew that he lost the election and spread lies to convince the public that he didn't lose. And DOJ basically says that's not the illegal part; some of the lies are protected speech, and...
View attachment 8195452
...he had the right to use legal means to challenge his loss, all of which failed in court.
View attachment 8195459
But he also tried unlawful means, and that's what he's being charged for.
View attachment 8195460
View attachment 8195461
So this is where the conspiracy starts. This is Rudy, Powell, Clarke, Eastman, etc playing a part in the conspiracy.
How did they do it? Keep reading....
Says the guy F'n this and F'n that.. IF it needs explained... Maybe a little above your head. Things were cheated .. Plain and simple. Even a Reddit Retard can see that.So when they did it, it was fucking stupid and when we do it it fucking stupid. What’s your point? Grow up.
Well ... If this opens the door ?? so let it be..
Since no court would hear the issue... Let me say again... SINCE NO COURT WOULD HEAR THE ISSUE... He now has a chance to bring the issues forward.
Yes, but it’s one vote with a highly disproportionate weighting within a small group.That gives him 1 vote.
it would give him one vote in one county. I would say that anyone who owns a house, anyone who owns land would get a vote. No more welfare votes, no more ballot harvesting.Yes, but it’s one vote with a highly disproportionate weighting within a small group.
At local and state level it could be an autocracy.
That's not how it works.Yes, but it’s one vote with a highly disproportionate weighting within a small group.
At local and state level it could be an autocracy.
It was good enough for the Founding Fathers.So veterans with no property can’t vote? People born and raised here but without the means or desire to buy property are effectively not citizens? Does simple ownership of property grant citizenship? That opens it all up to foreign intervention.
Here’s the facts: the two states with the highest welfare burdens are actual NET contributors to Federal coffers. Every other state benefits from those two states.
I’m not suggesting that because they have welfare burdens they’re economically good, rather your focus on welfare doesn’t solve anything. Causation vs correlation.
So were wooden teeth.It was good enough for the Founding Fathers.
You’re confusing state budget with federal income.Commiefornia has a $32 billion deficit and NY state has a $9 billion deficit for next year. They were bailed out with Covid bucks and right back to where they were. But they help out so much don’t they?
FFS.So were wooden teeth.
If you are not retired. Not a veteran. Cannot prove earned income in any of the last 3 years. Have not paid real estate taxes in any of the last three years. Then no. You should not be allowed to vote.So veterans with no property can’t vote? People born and raised here but without the means or desire to buy property are effectively not citizens? Does simple ownership of property grant citizenship? That opens it all up to foreign intervention.
Here’s the facts: the two states with the highest welfare burdens are actual NET contributors to Federal coffers. Every other state benefits from those two states.
I’m not suggesting that because they have welfare burdens they’re economically good, rather your focus on welfare doesn’t solve anything. Causation vs correlation.
I’m pointing out that with all that “income” they still are broke. Sure they pay out a lot in federal tax but they also have a lot of income that stays instate and they still overspend. Everybody gets a cut that’s why a permit is needed to wipe your ass.You’re confusing state budget with federal income.
So having access to guns is an inalienable right but voting isn’t?FFS.
Why should anyone with no skin in the game, veteran or not, have any say in how much I pay in taxes?
You are correct. Very well done. Voting is not a right. If you think it is, please forward some links to the Constitution that describes it.So having access to guns is an inalienable right but voting isn’t?
You want to have the majority of this country who don’t own property being armed but with no say in their govt.
Do you have any sense of history in how that plays out?
Hint: Boston, tea, white dudes pretending to be Indians.
You might want to look up the 14th, 15th, 17th, 19th and 26th amendments to the constitution.You are correct. Very well done. Voting is not a right. If you think it is, please forward some links to the Constitution that describes it.
As is the case in many respects to this great nation, there are many superstitions and misconceptions. This is another one.
24th Amendment.You are correct. Very well done. Voting is not a right. If you think it is, please forward some links to the Constitution that describes it.
As is the case in many respects to this great nation, there are many superstitions and misconceptions. This is another one.
The smartest group of guys the world has ever seen got together and came up with a plan to run this country. Things went along just fine until worthless fucksticks started changing things up.So having access to guns is an inalienable right but voting isn’t?
You want to have the majority of this country who don’t own property being armed but with no say in their govt.
Do you have any sense of history in how that plays out?
Hint: Boston, tea, white dudes pretending to be Indians.
Foxnews doesn’t even consider Trump part of the Republican presidential debate.
Right.As if anybody is going to tune in to watch those stiffs. They want to see Trump.