Trump: Live Press Conference Now

Nailed the issue of the illegality of the leaks.

Who is releasing the content of Oval Office phone calls to Mexico/Australia as an example.

He needs to open a can of whoop ass.
 
  • Like
Reactions: abizdafuzz
Crushing the press now by defining how Wikileaks releasing info hacked from an unsecure server is distinctly different than leaks from secure Oval Office phone lines.

The press only implicates itself when it asks questions that will expose their complicit support of the Dems.
 
  • Like
Reactions: abizdafuzz
He needs to speak more in person. He is so much better than his surrogates. He is schooling the press.

I expect an absolute shitstorm on the evening news. Before this is over he will be falsely accused of having killed puppies mid presser.
 
  • Like
Reactions: abizdafuzz
Yeah, we do, and Trump needs to stop campaigning. I don't know that Hillary-mentioning is worth it at this point.

It exposes the hypocrisy of the press.

He is being crucified for a phone call while she actually sold uranium to Putin.

as well it exposes the difference between leaks of a private server vs Oval Office phone lines.

Like most things left...if they accuse you of something it is likely the answer is in their mirror.

Listening now I observe how the press is beginning to kowtow to him. Art of the Deal I guess.

One thing for the biased press to be shut out but he better be wary of silencing legitimate journalism.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: abizdafuzz
Gauntlet thrown down to Congressional Black Caucus.

I doubt they would risk their ability to racially divide and risk having the Trump admin make a difference in Philly or Chicago.
 
  • Like
Reactions: abizdafuzz
It exposes the hypocrisy of the press.

He is being crucified for a phone call while she actually sold uranium to Putin.

as well it exposes the difference between leaks of a private server vs Oval Office phone lines.


I get it. What I'm driving at is that I find it ridiculous to continue to have to outline their hypocrisy, no matter how poorly informed and disinterested the majority of Americans are. The time for politely rule-bound fisticuffs is over. Anarchists are in the streets, the lower decks of .gov are full of mutineers, and the Fourth Estate are printing lies.

What next?

 
I get it. What I'm driving at is that I find it ridiculous to continue to have to outline their hypocrisy, no matter how poorly informed and disinterested the majority of Americans are. The time for politely rule-bound fisticuffs is over. Anarchists are in the streets, the lower decks of .gov are full of mutineers, and the Fourth Estate are printing lies.

What next?

Agreed the fact that by now people dont get it reflects poorly on our society.

I live in MA so alot of this is masked by the fact people up here think D means the party of John F Kennedy. They have no idea that even that offensive version of the D party was a better alternative to what the present D party represents.

I wonder also how many D supporters are psychologically unable to come to terms with what they have been supporting.

If they accept what we see I think many realize the end of the road if D continues on its path will lead to civil war which is a very scary prospect for both sides. When I consider it I have to recall the words of Lt Speirs in BOB when asked how he functions in combat and his reply is that he has already accepted that he is dead.

The other alternative is to accept D for what D represents with the full knowledge you are part of the criminal machine.

Members of the Soviet revolution had to make a similar choice --- They either had to continue with their crimes believing it would in the end result in a better world or they had to accept that their actions were criminal and accept that they are abominable people. Getting a prospective supporter to commit a small crime is a good way to create a rabid supporter. By breaking that taboo in the belief it is for good the person must either continue to commit crimes in order to bring about that good that will never be obtained or they must come to terms that they are a bad person.

How many Germans put the innocent soldier on the edge of the trench pistol in hand, persecuted on their knees, than goaded him on so that they would feel better about the crimes they have committed prior to that moment? By having the innocent soldier join their ranks it psychologically justified their crimes.




 
Saturday night, my wife was having dinner with a friend. Politics came up in the conversation and my wife brought up about how something needs to be done with Soros and his paid henchmen. My wife's friend asked "Who is Soros"? she and her husband claimed they never heard of him. Unbelievable!!!
 
When his popularity goes up ten points tomorrow they wont make the connection that he was elected because we are tired of the press fed BS and we actually want a Constitutional Republic run under the rule of law.