Re: Unertl M40A1 Scope on fleabay 1 day left
Well, an old argument for sure but here we go again; the parts of the "T" are Unertl and originally built by the Unertl company at least and all parts of the "T" series are of the original contract, original drawing and blueprint design. All the MST-100s and T Unertls bought today by civilians were not used by the Marine Corp, the designs were. The USO MST100s are a copy of the original Unertl design. AGAIN, NONE of the USO or Unertl scopes(except for a few original "USMC Snipers" and USN "10x Snipers" in collections) owned today were ever used by the Marines or SEALS. However, the Marine Corp did use USO MST100s and "Unertl Snipers" and the NAVY/FBI did use "10x snipers."
Reference: My persoanl experiences and discussions with John Unertl 1986-88. Discussions with "Aaron Davis" owner of the present Unertl Scope Company and Unertl scope technician and historian who built scopes and worked with John Unertl (October 2012).
<span style="font-weight: bold">NOT my opinion, FACT.</span>
The original argument of "originality" and value is subjective. The comparative value of the MST100 vs "T" series value is ridiculous at best, it's all personal opinion. Personally I'd rather have a Unertl "T" series or original Unertl "10x Sniper" or "USMC sniper." The USO MST100 and the mount whether used by the Marine Corp at one point or not is still a copy of the original design, the Unertl 10x sniper or "T" series scope...period. One could argue(and I am) that the "T" series is closer to the original than the USO version but again, even that arguement is a useless argument, no one except for a few lucky collectors have ORIGINALS!
<span style="font-weight: bold">Just my opinion.</span>
R/Mark