Re: USO SN3-S or Nightforce 2.5-10x24
I've never had an SFP variable scope so my choice would be based on familiarity and wishing to standardise one way or the other across my scopes.
Schmidt and Bender offers the following as an assessment of the pros/cons of both:
"We now offer two systems of reticle placement, each equally precise. The decision upon which system is "best" depends upon the scope and its intended application.
The two possible locations for placement of the reticle are within the objective image plane or the eyepiece image plane.
A typically European design positions the reticle at the first (objective) image plane. In this configuration, the reticle and the image of the target are enlarged or reduced simultaneously as the magnification is changed. The relationship between target and reticle remain unchanged, regardless of the chosen magnification. The advantage to this design is that point of impact will not change at different magnification levels, as can happen with a lower-quality scope.
Positioning the reticle in the second (eyepiece) image plane is referred to as the "American" design. The reticle is independent from the magnification system, which means as magnification of the target is enlarged or reduced, the apparent size of the reticle remains the same. To use this system in a riflescope while preventing any possible shift of point of impact is extremely demanding, requiring the utmost precision of mechanical components.
These two design principles offer different advantages to the hunter. The European design allows the reticle to be used for estimating distance, because it always covers the same proportion of the target, regardless of magnification. Consistent point of impact across the entire magnification range is virtually 100%.
The American design allows the hunter to shoot very well at small targets at long distances, because the reticle obscures only a tiny portion of the image at high magnifications. Riflescopes with low magnification, such as those used for rapid shooting at short ranges, are also well suited to this application. This is because the reticle retains the desired amount of coverage when the smallest magnification is selected, in order to obtain the largest possible field of view."