• Frank's Lesson's Contest

    We want to see your skills! Post a video between now and November 1st showing what you've learned from Frank's lessons and 3 people will be selected to win a free shirt. Good luck everyone!

    Create a channel Learn more
  • Having trouble using the site?

    Contact support

UTG Max Strength Quick Detachable rings 4 rimfire

TOP PREDATOR

Gunny Sergeant
Full Member
Minuteman
Jul 19, 2008
4,591
83
54
SCRANTON AREA PENNSYLVANIA
I was looking at several sets of rings for a CZ 455 build and came across the UTG “Max Strength” detachable rings. I know they are not Burris, Leopold, or Badger Ordinance, but I though they wouold still be worth a try.

http://leapers.com/prod_detail.php?mitem...amp;mtrack=12m7

They had the “tacticool look” I was going for (matte finish, choice of 4 or 6 mounting screws each, a solid appearance) they were priced very reasonably, (around $20.00 for two) plus they detach with a turn of a lever, giving the option of removing the optic for storage / transport or to swap out with a different optic. They are available in several heights and 1” & 30mm tube dimensions. Depending on the height, there is a cut out area providing a see through option, though on a 1 piece picatinny or Weaver base rail may be too high to see the iron sights.

UTG1RINGTFBSVIEW.jpg


They arrived in a nice package and included an Allen wrench, an extra mounting screw, and well illustrated color instructions. Though packaging should not be a real consideration, they did a good job of “dressing them up”.

I had gotten the medium height 30mm 6 screw Quick detachable (lever) version. Mounted upon a 20 MOA 1 piece base and using a 56mm objective and lens cover, there was just enough clearance with the barrel. It’s my guess that low height will be fine for 50 mm and below with the base. The construction is aluminum, and they are very weighty. The inside of the ring sports a gasket like material glued in which tend to help with the optic slipping and doesn’t mark up the finish on the optic. After mounting several different scopes, the finish of the optics were not harmed.

Once applied on the picatinny scope base (will also work on a weaver base) there is some adjustment required so that the levers can be put into the “locked” position and not being to loose when engaged. I found the clamping to be quite solid, and using a ring alignment tool, the alignment between the two rings to be spot on.

UTG2RINGS500100VIEW.jpg


I do not have a contricity gauge, so I cannot confirm the “roundness” of the ring. However after looking at the several optics that I had mounted, it appeared no damage or marring was evident.

Once the optic was zeroed in at 50 yards, I removed the ring / scope combo, then put it back on. The POI remained the same. I did the same at 100 and 200 yards where a little deviation produces big results, the POI remained the same.

Although I can’t vouch for a centerfire application, for rimfire use these rings seem to be functional and good looking, at a price that’s manageable.

UTG2RINGSTSVIEW.jpg

UTGRINGSWSCOPEMOUNTED.jpg



They seem to also be able to work out fine on my Savage MKII that is pulling double duty. For most things I'm hooked on mildots, but for my smallbore silhouette pursuits love a target dot. A simple "throwing" of the 2 levers, remove the one scope, replace with the other zeroed for the different application with no effect on the point of impact.
 
Re: UTG Max Strength Quick Detachable rings 4 rimfire

didn't try to "abuse" them. they are going on what is going to be a bench queen, so are not going to be in a hunting / field use type of thing either.

don't know how they'll stand up to centerfire recoil, or if the springs in the lever cams will eventually lose tension. but so far decent rings for around $20.00, appear to be on par with or better than other rings in that price range and a good value for use on a rimfire in that price range.

looked at a multitude of reviews on them before the purchase, with only a fraction found to be unfavorable, nothing out of the ordinary complaints shown for more expensive rings.

i too shared the utter total garbage opinion, but then again:
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: TOP PREDATOR</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I know they are not Burris, Leopold, or Badger Ordinance, but I though they would still be worth a try.
</div></div>
some of the other utg offerings are better used as sinkers for your next fishing trip, but this line / model of rings seems to have been better constructed, used better materials, and a step above the usual utg stuff.

i hate to compare air rifles to "regular rifles" and still a novice when speaking of them, however, i found a lot of information, especially when it comes to springers that have a punishing forward and rearward spring recoil that tears up alot of sub-par equipment. the recoil of modern air rifles can actually meet and surpass that of a rimfire, especially .22lr standard velocity ammos.

many are using "top shelf premium grade rings" for just that reason, and many are also using what is considered the lower end of the spectrum. many of the reviews i've read and email / PM questions to many of those folks using these rings on such air rifles have found them up to the task of prolonged use.

also found that most of the reviews of folks using them on lower & middle caliber centerfires are favorable.

i generally only use product reviews for any product as a trend analysis, as for example when it comes to rings, many fail to grasp that the slots in a picatinny cut base (.206") are larger than that of a weaver slot (.180), and rings that are designated to "fit" both will not precisely fit both without some play in the pic rail application as the smaller weaver slot sized crossbar doesn't completely engage the picatinny slot, needing the picatinny rail application to have the rings securely bumped up to the ridge in opposing directions to avoid them from slipping or moving around in the picatinny slot. so when many mount rings that are able to "fit" both, they actually have space on the picatinny slot causing problems and a bad review for a secure fit. this also happens with top shelf rings that "fit" both. so many reviews have to be taken with a grain of salt.

the only true fit for a picatinny rail is a ring that specifies that it will only fit a picatinny rail. on the flip side, those rings will not fit into a weaver slotted base.

for a quick analogy, much like a 15" tire, though just about any size will "fit" a 15" rim, a different tire dimension may rub or cause complications in other places.


sorry about the tangent, and want to also add that I do not work for UTG or any distributor their products, nor has any consideration been given for any review of this product or any product that I have put two cents in on.

of course if any problems develop with tese rings, i'll be sure to update the review.
 
Re: UTG Max Strength Quick Detachable rings 4 rimfire

I am always looking for a a way to save a bit of money, and keep the grandkids up and shooting with quality, reliable rifle parts. It hurt heavy last month when I dropped $200 bucks for Mark IV rings on the granddaughters rifle. But I figured worth it in the long run for her. But now with the others getting into shooting as much is getting pricey to keep up with all of them.

I may pick up a set and when I run the stress shooting test on the new stock core material, pop a set on the test action. A thousand rounds, ran through the rifle, may show any weakness on the rings. Kill two birds with one stone. I am going to check it out just for clarity of mind and curiosity sakes.

I am not a cheapskate. I outlay for the best quality and then alot more sometimes. But keeping up with 6 grandchildren shooting is eating my budget for shooting and upgrades. And yes each one of them has their own rifle, and the one granddaughter has three. So you figure the math on my shooting budget.

Thanks Top will for bringing this to light. I will check them out and put them through their paces. Who knows maybe you just saved me a coupld grand over the next 2-3 years.
 
Re: UTG Max Strength Quick Detachable rings 4 rimfire

8-32 accushot, it was a loaner from a guy here that wanted to sell it. those scope pics were from a few months ago.

he suspected it was losing it's ability to hold a zero, it was confirmed by me, since then i put a several different ones on it, settled on and pleased with this one (hopefully the last):

http://www.snipershide.com/forum/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=3546516&gonew=1#UNREAD

during the 5-6 times swaping of optics during this exchange, the rings left no marks on the scope, mounting / top strap screws stayed solid, nothing seemed to be stripping out.

on my current rig, i didn't want to go cheap either and do things "the right way", but figured these rings were worth a shot at 20.00. turns out they will probably remain on.

if anything funky hapens with them over time, i'll be sure to update the thread.
 
Re: UTG Max Strength Quick Detachable rings 4 rimfire

I have these exact rings mounted on a Hatsan .25 cal magnum springer air rifle and they are holding up well. This particular gun has significant double recoil, yet the rings haven't moved or loosened. The recoil is much more than a .22 rimfire, so these should do well on that application.
 
Re: UTG Max Strength Quick Detachable rings 4 rimfire

thanks for a nice rundown on those rings. i have a real hard time buying anything cheap, even for rimfires. my logic is that if i need to i can always move the rings and glass from my rimfires around to other centerfire rifles without issue. my last pruchase for a rimfire was seekiins rings and a swfa s10x42. i'm actually swapping that scope to another rifle that i mainly use irons on just to see what it's capable of with glass......then it's back on my 455. the review seems favorable. keep us posted on the longterm, and perhaps i'll have to rethink my rimfire gear. could free up somesubstial money that way.