Q
QuickNDirty
Guest
Damn, Greg. Good shit.The 2A is not like other judicial issues.
It's not about it being Constitutional; it's about it being the actual Constitution, in and of itself.
You cannot argue about whether the Constitution is Constitutional. That question is moot.
Infringement is not about an Amendment; it is about whether the Constitution applies to everything, or even anything.
The gun grabbers do not need to be made to understand about infringement.
They already understand. What they are doing is attacking the Constitution itself.
In my book that's not just treason, it's blatantly deliberate treason with a side dish of sedition.
Stop trying to get the SCOTUS to interpret whether the Constitution guarantees the validity of the Constitution itself.
It is the 2A that validates and defends the Constitution.
Use it or lose it; and not just the 2A, but the entire Constitution itself.
It's get off the F'n dime time, guys; and has been for a long time.
It's amazing how many of us just don't get that core part about having the 2A in the first place.
It ain't about hunting ducks, guys; or about pointing a shotgun out the window and firing it to scare away robbers, no matter how hard they try to tell you it is.
Roberts isn't the problem. Defending the Constitution itself is not his job.
It's ours. We took those oaths to defend the Constitution, as did the current members of our armed forces. We're not doing that job, and neither are they.
THIS is what martial law is supposed to be about. There's an insurrection going on, hot and wet. It's going on inside the Congress. This is not about SCOTUS making a ruling. WE make the ruling.
Are we all getting it yet...?
I believe it is incumbent upon, and time for it to happen, that the President to declare martial law. If he does, I'm with him, as I believe we all should be.
Greg