Virginia McDonald's bans amish teens

Also, TBH, I'm not sure I can call that sufficiently "muttish." All of those aren't so far removed from each other, genetic wise. Now, if you also included some Asian (including Native American), Latin and/or African ancestry in that, you'd definitely qualify as a "mutt." :D
And thank you for giving me the reason to say, "Now look who's racist." You are saying I cannot be a mutt because I don't have the right shade and type of melanin.
 
And thank you for giving me the reason to say, "Now look who's racist." You are saying I cannot be a mutt because I don't have the right shade and type of melanin.

Not at all. Remember the very definition of "racism." It is the belief that one's race/ethnicity is superior to all others. Did I say that? I wasn't saying that your "mutt mix" is inferior. I was saying only that the elements are so similar that I can't call it a full mutt mix. I'm not saying that that's bad or inferior, not at all. It would be stupid of me to say that it's inferior, as a portion of my mutt mix is also Scotch-Irish.
 
Not at all. Remember the very definition of "racism." It is the belief that one's race/ethnicity is superior to all others. Did I say that? I wasn't saying that your "mutt mix" is inferior. I was saying only that the elements are so similar that I can't call it a full mutt mix. I'm not saying that that's bad or inferior, not at all. It would be stupid of me to say that it's inferior, as a portion of my mutt mix is also Scotch-Irish.
Two things. Scottish ancestry is scot or scottish. Not scotch. In fact, that is the pet peeve of one my favorite actors, Ewan MacGregor, from Scotland.

"Scotch is a drink, not a heritage."

Second, if we really want to get specific, mutt is a dog breeding term. A cross breeding of any two purebreds is a mutt. Any more than that is a mongrel. So, technically, you and I are mongrels.

As for superiority, you just got done saying that I am not really a mutt because I am the wrong mix of ethnic heritage. So, I am denied the privilege of being a mutt or mongrel? That makes me lower or second class.
 
Last edited:
Two things. Scottish ancestry is scot or scottish. Not scotch. In fact, that is the pet peeve of one my favorite actors, Ewan MacGregor, from Scotland.

"Scotch is a drink, not a heritage."

Second, if we really want to get specific, mutt is a dog breeding term. A cross breeding of any two purebreds is a mutt. Any more than that is a mongrel. So, technically, you and are mongrels.

As for superiority, you just got done saying that I am not really a mutt because I don't am the wrong mix of ethnic heritage. So, I am denied the privilege of being a mutt or mongrel? That makes me lower or second class.
Makes you a mutt with white privilege
 
Two things. Scottish ancestry is scot or scottish. Not scotch. In fact, that is the pet peeve of one my favorite actors, Ewan MacGregor, from Scotland.

"Scot-Irish" then.

Second, if we really want to get specific, mutt is a dog breeding term.

I'm aware of that. But it doesn't mean we can't use if "figuratively," now does it?

A cross breeding of any two purebreds is a mutt. Any more than that is a mongrel. So, technically, you and I are mongrels.

FIFY. I'd still prefer my figurative use of "mutt." "Mongrel" has, Historically (AFAIK) also implied behavioral disorders in dogs (bad tempers, etc.).

As for superiority, you just got done saying that I am not really a mutt because I don't am the wrong mix of ethnic heritage.

No, I just got done saying I couldn't refer to you that way. Doesn't mean you are or are not. You decide what makes you a mutt/mongrel or not. I do the same for myself. We just have different standards as to what's what. But I never said "you're inferior" because the standard is not the same..

So, I am denied the privilege of being a mutt or mongrel?

No, you are not. You decide that for yourself. Doesn't matter what I think.
 
"Scot-Irish" then.



I'm aware of that. But it doesn't mean we can't use if "figuratively," now does it?



FIFY. I'd still prefer my figurative use of "mutt." "Mongrel" has, Historically (AFAIK) also implied behavioral disorders in dogs (bad tempers, etc.).



No, I just got done saying I couldn't refer to you that way. Doesn't mean you are or are not. You decide what makes you a mutt/mongrel or not. I do the same for myself. We just have different standards as to what's what. But I never said "you're inferior" because the standard is not the same..



No, you are not. You decide that for yourself. Doesn't matter what I think.
Again, mongrel may be behaving badly but mongrel is a breeding term and I learned this from dog breeders. I used to belong to a dog forum and the resources of those who show and compete with dogs from the breeding shows to the agility shows. That's how I know what mongrel means.
 
Again, mongrel may be behaving badly but mongrel is a breeding term and I learned this from dog breeders. I used to belong to a dog forum and the resources of those who show and compete with dogs from the breeding shows to the agility shows. That's how I know what mongrel means.
All I know is I am definitely not 1/1024 American Indian like a certain US senator.

What-the-hey
 
Tucker had a vid about his corruption by another black preacher with a bunch of stuff that was known but has been heavily suppressed by the MSM. the question arises should the FBI have killed him? i believe they did and that is in danger of coming out-LOL. i don't think that is a good precedent seeing as how the FBI is and has been weaponized against anyone not on the deep stages page.
 
Tucker had a vid about his corruption by another black preacher with a bunch of stuff that was known but has been heavily suppressed by the MSM. the question arises should the FBI have killed him? i believe they did and that is in danger of coming out-LOL. i don't think that is a good precedent seeing as how the FBI is and has been weaponized against anyone not on the deep stages page.

Yeah, I have a different view than some. I always saw him as a true believer and committed to the Civil Rights movement. He started to have socialist leanings because they fit with some of his Utopian views. But he wasn't a commie. Hoover despised him (and was racist as hell, in addition to being a cross-dressing Peter Puffer)... and was utterly against the Civil Rights movement. So tapped him, collected dirt... and, yes, spied on his affairs. King wasn't a saint. Who is?

The people I regard as lower than whale shit at the bottom of the Marianas trench were his immediate Acolytes... People like Sharpton, Jesse Jackson and a whole coterie of race-baiting garbage who turned his legacy into far left identity politics. All while riding his dead coat-tails into huge bank accounts and a penchant for blackmailing anyone and everyone to increase their power and bank accounts. King had really poor taste in picking members of his inner circle. Or maybe he didn't pick them? Maybe he was stuck with them because (as they do with everything and have for 60 years) they stuck their noses in the trough and would not take it out.

No.... I think King was the real thing. Same as Malcolm-X. Who was all about bootstrapping and 'separation' which would lead to independence and success for the black community.

Remember that the FBI has re-written a lot of history to make those they persecute look bad. You know, like the evil white supremacists and veterans and patriots who they have turned into 'The greatest domestic threat in America' while ignoring leftist pieces of shit who burn cities and have pallets of bricks delivered to them... Oh and laptops, Russia Hoaxes and, of course, shooting people and burning their churches when a non-kinetic approach would have sufficed. But, hey, not TV-worthy.

So maybe I'm Naif. But I am pretty sure that had King lived, the 'identity politics' mess would have been put off or avoided.

And look at his daughters (and late wife) who were sort of 'Kennedy-level' conservatives. Liberal at the time, but by today's standards, they'd be to the right of Atilla the Hun.

That's why I'll respectfully disagree with the legacy of King as a commie or a POS. I think he was the real deal. And in almost every way that counts, on the right side of history. Which took a nasty turn after the Long Hot Summer and because of a dumber-than-a-stump POS with a deer rifle.

But that's just me.

Sirhr
 
  • Like
Reactions: plong
So, the government compiles stats, as well.
The government stats have been BLM'ed for well over a decade. Ever see all those collages of blacks and mexican arrests all tagged as "white"?
Likewise, they often seem to fail to show the violent side of the "non-amish," because they know on which side of that narrative their bread is buttered.
Either you mistyped this, or the "What are you drinking now" thread wants an update.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mosin46
Yeah, I have a different view than some. I always saw him as a true believer and committed to the Civil Rights movement. He started to have socialist leanings because they fit with some of his Utopian views. But he wasn't a commie. Hoover despised him (and was racist as hell, in addition to being a cross-dressing Peter Puffer)... and was utterly against the Civil Rights movement. So tapped him, collected dirt... and, yes, spied on his affairs. King wasn't a saint. Who is?

The people I regard as lower than whale shit at the bottom of the Marianas trench were his immediate Acolytes... People like Sharpton, Jesse Jackson and a whole coterie of race-baiting garbage who turned his legacy into far left identity politics. All while riding his dead coat-tails into huge bank accounts and a penchant for blackmailing anyone and everyone to increase their power and bank accounts. King had really poor taste in picking members of his inner circle. Or maybe he didn't pick them? Maybe he was stuck with them because (as they do with everything and have for 60 years) they stuck their noses in the trough and would not take it out.

No.... I think King was the real thing. Same as Malcolm-X. Who was all about bootstrapping and 'separation' which would lead to independence and success for the black community.

Remember that the FBI has re-written a lot of history to make those they persecute look bad. You know, like the evil white supremacists and veterans and patriots who they have turned into 'The greatest domestic threat in America' while ignoring leftist pieces of shit who burn cities and have pallets of bricks delivered to them... Oh and laptops, Russia Hoaxes and, of course, shooting people and burning their churches when a non-kinetic approach would have sufficed. But, hey, not TV-worthy.

So maybe I'm Naif. But I am pretty sure that had King lived, the 'identity politics' mess would have been put off or avoided.

And look at his daughters (and late wife) who were sort of 'Kennedy-level' conservatives. Liberal at the time, but by today's standards, they'd be to the right of Atilla the Hun.

That's why I'll respectfully disagree with the legacy of King as a commie or a POS. I think he was the real deal. And in almost every way that counts, on the right side of history. Which took a nasty turn after the Long Hot Summer and because of a dumber-than-a-stump POS with a deer rifle.

But that's just me.

Sirhr
agree with all of that. not a huge fan but... i don't think king was a commie . many of his crew were by belief and action if not card carriers. yes,the cross dressers had dirt on anybody that his boys could get it on. is how he stayed in power and office so long. the FBI is obviously 1 of the biggest challenges to personal freedom in this country. needs to be totally dismantled-LOL.
yes,i think if he had lived we would be way better off in race relations and would have missed Obama and the identity politics abortion we are suffering with. Sharpton and Jackson are about as corrupt as the Clintons,just not quite as successful. they do help feed into the white guilt narrative that the white libs love. in truth his sexual misbehavior was no worse than JFK's and Clintons. he and JFK didn't kill their bimbos. but it seems that the ones that killed JFK prob killed a couple of his.
as an aside i think that if JFK had lived we would all be better off and safer not nirvana but much more stable and prosperous.
surprised to find another Malcolm X fan on here. he was a separatist not quite a radical as Randy Weaver. i like to believe that he and King could have come together and put the blacks on a path that would have produced true benign integration and avoided the current disastrous racial divide. the response of many blacks to MGAG could be a + sign that things can be fixed. i doubt it,however,too entrenched and supported by too many deranged people.
 
BTW, I'm seeing reports of this story on Newsmax. Absolutely no mention of race in their accounts. None.
hate to say it but black violent crime is rampant and increasing. same with Hispanic crime thanks to the Obiden imports. yes most black violent crime is black on black. but,random unprovoked attacks on whites is increasing. this is not new. i have seen it personally several times as far back as 40 years. # 1 problem in the manipulated reporting is who is white,who is black and who is Hispanic. we have all seen examples of those gov lies. just something else from your rulers to not believe. because of where i live,what i do and where i go; i see little rascism either direction. but i don't go many likely places.
 
It also should be noted that mexicans became white hispanics after George Zimmerman. They thought they had the perfect white on black hate crime and it turns out a mexican guy was getting beaten to a pulp by a black guy until he managed to get a shot off.

Also, my other point I want to reiterate.

It is cultural. Some of the smartest and kindest people I know are from Nigeria and another caregiver from Ethiopia. They happen to have black skin which doesn't mean a damn thing. They come from a good culture of people who work and study hard and want to achieve good things.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mosin46
You know you want it.

iu