Good to hear
I actually run a March FX 4.5-28 on my 30 Nos, it's an awesome scope but I cant afford another.
Which reticle?
ILya
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Good to hear
I actually run a March FX 4.5-28 on my 30 Nos, it's an awesome scope but I cant afford another.
I don't know about your application, but I had one side by side with a 18x XTR3 earlier this week and preferred the LHT's IQ. The lighter weight is nice, doesn't make an AR feel too top heavy. The LHT needs a throw lever, but so does the XTR3.I've been looking at scopes that would work on an AR15 SPR that would be at home both in the field as well as shooting some Quantified Performance or IWI gas gun matches. This definitely looks like it could bridge those two well. I had been leaning heavily toward an XTRIII, but with this scope being nearly 1/3 lighter, I think this scope with an offset dot would be a pretty damn good setup for a lighter SPR that could still do work on the square range. Has anyone here run this scope in a similar setup?
I run this same scope on a 6.5 and 300 SS switch barrel in a FML TR-1Which reticle?
ILya
Thanks! My only real concern about it is the reported zero shift with impacts, as I tend to not be particularly easy on stuff. Got some thinking to doI don't know about your application, but I had one side by side with a 18x XTR3 earlier this week and preferred the LHT's IQ. The lighter weight is nice, doesn't make an AR feel too top heavy. The LHT needs a throw lever, but so does the XTR3.
I used one at a dusty NRL Hunter match with no issues whatsoever. I did add an offset throw lever from MK machining that worked great.Anymore feedback on this?
I know it gets raised a bit - but money no object, would you take the 5oz weight penalty for the better glass and controls of a TT Hunter or Marksman 3-15?For what it's worth, I have been running one on the Fix since February 2021 and I have not been tempted to replace it with anything.
Make what you will out of that.
ILya
If you can afford a tt get a tt…. Because if you don’t you’ll always have doubts if the tt was gunna be better…. Or maybe that’s just me lolI know it gets raised a bit - but money no object, would you take the 5oz weight penalty for the better glass and controls of a TT Hunter or Marksman 3-15?
Still trying to talk myself in to a TT…
Along this same line, how does the LHT stack up to the AMG?I know it gets raised a bit - but money no object, would you take the 5oz weight penalty for the better glass and controls of a TT Hunter or Marksman 3-15?
Still trying to talk myself in to a TT…
I have had both. I prefer the LHT as the AMG really didn't offer anything more for my purposes. I have several of the LHT scopes and use them on my loaner rifles for hunters and they have been great.Along this same line, how does the LHT stack up to the AMG?
I'm tempted to upgrade another rifle to a LHT, but also leads to thoughts of a used AMG as weight is less important. I've poured over the specs and AMG should have a much wider FOV. But I haven't seen much comment about differences in image quality other the AMG is better.
Thanks.
I know it gets raised a bit - but money no object, would you take the 5oz weight penalty for the better glass and controls of a TT Hunter or Marksman 3-15?
Still trying to talk myself in to a TT…
I have also been harassing Blaser periodically to add a modern reticle to their B1 2.8-20x50 telescope.If you can afford a Tangent, get a Tangent. I have a TT315M that is going on the 8.6Blackout Fix, most likely.
Whether the weight is worth the price premium really depends on what you are looking to accomplish and whether you have the weight budget.
ILya
I have the mk machining unit, works well.What exact throw lever are most guys using?
Is there a specific one? Heard there was one that needed to be offset a little bit?I have the mk machining unit, works well.
https://www.mkmachining.com/product/vortex-lh-throw-lever/ is the one I use. No problems running on my 65 saum bolt gun all hunting season last year.Is there a specific one? Heard there was one that needed to be offset a little bit?
Specs on the website say this model has the ”Rev stop” [same as strike eagle] not the “RZR Zero stop” like earlier Razor models. Vortex isn’t making a point of how much elevation adjustment range you lose when you install the ring [and the shills doing youtube reviews are staying away from that drawback also].It is the same turret and zero-stop as all the HD-LHT scopes use. Vortex has a patent on it, so you see it in different proucts.
ILya
Install the zero stop ring and you get 2 revs 12 mils from zero. The scope is a long range hunting scope hence the LHT name. I have a 3-15 and a 4.5-22. They're extremely light, clear glass, good reticle, non finicky eyebox or parallax. The parallax and mag knobs are quite stiff and the turrets a very soft. They do track tho. Don't drop your gun, zero WILL shift, mine was almost 3" at 100y when it fell off the end gate.Specs on the website say this model has the ”Rev stop” [same as strike eagle] not the “RZR Zero stop” like earlier Razor models. Vortex isn’t making a point of how much elevation adjustment range you lose when you install the ring [and the shills doing youtube reviews are staying away from that drawback also].
Still, looks like a good choice for a long range shooting class.
Apparently the reticle changes from .5 mil hash marks to .1 mil out past 4 mil to the left or right, making it less busy in the center, and only the cross illuminates, not the christmas tree.
You get two revolutions from the zero stop shim. Since the zero stop ia 0.5mil below the turret zero, you get 11.5 mils of up once it's set.Web specs suggest that its 6 mil per turn , 22.4 mil total, thats 11.2 mil up or down — so what’s the new limit with the stop ring installed?
Without opening a whole can of worms…Install the zero stop ring and you get 2 revs 12 mils from zero. The scope is a long range hunting scope hence the LHT name. I have a 3-15 and a 4.5-22. They're extremely light, clear glass, good reticle, non finicky eyebox or parallax. The parallax and mag knobs are quite stiff and the turrets a very soft. They do track tho. Don't drop your gun, zero WILL shift, mine was almost 3" at 100y when it fell off the end gate.
Nightforce ultra lite 4 screw rings. To be fair, the zero shifted upon drop of my 3-15x42 hd lht, not my 4.5-22. There is a thread either on here or Rokslide where as user took his rifle with an hd lht on it and dropped it to a padded mat from 1-2' and the poi was wildly all over the place.Without opening a whole can of worms…
What rings/mount set up were you using? Is it feasible the rings contributed?
It’s a hard thing to replicate without destructive testing, anything anecdotal can help.
That test, and that particular user you mention, has had some commentators from this side of the shooting community cast dispersions on its legitimacy. Your experience seems to match though, so it is what it is.Nightforce ultra lite 4 screw rings. To be fair, the zero shifted upon drop of my 3-15x42 hd lht, not my 4.5-22. There is a thread either on here or Rokslide where as user took his rifle with an hd lht on it and dropped it to a padded mat from 1-2' and the poi was wildly all over the place.
My rifle was leaned on tailgate, it fell left onto ground hitting windage turret, my poi was around 3" R on first shot, next 3 made a tight cluster approx 2" right of point of aim. I don't try make a habit of dropping my rifles, but it's happened 4x times now. The nx8 and gen2 razor took it like a champ. The march and hd lht however did not.That test, and that particular user you mention, has had some commentators from this side of the shooting community cast dispersions on its legitimacy. Your experience seems to match though, so it is what it is.
I have a 4.5-22, and so far haven’t dropped it - but my confidence hasn’t been shaken and it’s shot true every time it’s gone on and off my Blaser R8.
Do it, I love mine!Yall are going to convince me to buy one of these and cost me some money.....
I bought a 4.5-22 earlier this year despite all the hearsay and regurgitation and I still really like it. I personally haven’t had a better optic at its price point and I’ve had hundreds of optics. Mine had a hell of a lot harder spill that 6” into a padded case on snow (LOL) and it didn’t shift so I continue to think that’s pure BS. I’m going down to shoot it again in the next couple hours, perhaps I’ll strap it down to the flat bed and let it bounce around down the property and across the creek.
I'm very close to doing it. I have an Ares 1-10, which I like a lot on my CLE AR, but the reticle isn't my favorite. Have you run this scope with any clip ons?Do it, I love mine!
Yall are going to convince me to buy one of these and cost me some money.....
I sell them for $15/ea to Hide members as well.Is the magnification ring super easy to turn? No. Do you have to be the hulk to operate it? Also no. A MKM throw lever makes it a complete non issue either way. The biggest issue is really just a lack of a great area to grab.
I bought a Burris XTRIIIi 3.3-18 and wish I would have gone with the LHT 4.5-22. Not real thrilled with the optical quality at higher magnification.I bought a 4.5-22 earlier this year despite all the hearsay and regurgitation and I still really like it. I personally haven’t had a better optic at its price point and I’ve had hundreds of optics. Mine had a hell of a lot harder spill that 6” into a padded case on snow (LOL) and it didn’t shift so I continue to think that’s pure BS. I’m going down to shoot it again in the next couple hours, perhaps I’ll strap it down to the flat bed and let it bounce around down the property and across the creek.
Send it back to Burris, my first XTR III 3.3-18 was a disappointment, I sent it to Burris and they sent me a new one that was much better, I would say the 2nd Burris was every bit as good as my LHT and maybe even slightly better in certain areas. Burris has quite a bit more FOV at similar magnification which I like too.I bought a Burris XTRIIIi 3.3-18 and wish I would have gone with the LHT 4.5-22. Not real thrilled with the optical quality at higher magnification.
Appreciate you putting your scope through a much more realistic torture test for usThis is far from a torture test but surely far more than dropping it onto a pad in the snow from less than a foot.
Strapped it to my bed and drove it down 3/4 mile of washed out mountain roads that haven’t been maintained for 3+ years that required 4 low and two very violent washed out creek crossings with steep rocky embankments on each side. It was bad enough I could feel my guts rearranging.
It’s zero’d with Barnes 127gr LRX and I shot the first two rounds of that which cut the center out of the target. The subsequent 5 rounds lower are Winchester 129gr that didn’t fair so well.
So it held zero through that.
Send it back to Burris, my first XTR III 3.3-18 was a disappointment, I sent it to Burris and they sent me a new one that was much better, I would say the 2nd Burris was every bit as good as my LHT and maybe even slightly better in certain areas. Burris has quite a bit more FOV at similar magnification which I like too.
I may reach out to them. I had a XTRII years ago that looked better than this one does. I used it calling coyotes the other night and could hardly make out a deer at 800 yards.Send it back to Burris, my first XTR III 3.3-18 was a disappointment, I sent it to Burris and they sent me a new one that was much better, I would say the 2nd Burris was every bit as good as my LHT and maybe even slightly better in certain areas. Burris has quite a bit more FOV at similar magnification which I like too.
Definitely reach out, I too had an XTR II 4-20 and the XTR III 3.3-18 is a definite upgrade in optical quality, it "should be" so if you have a III that is not as good as the older II, something is definitely awry.I may reach out to them. I had a XTRII years ago that looked better than this one does. I used it calling coyotes the other night and could hardly make out a deer at 800 yards.