Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
But it makes such a great thread title.We're not doomed. Except the 401K's of everyone who invested in this garbage.
But it makes such a great thread title.
One things for sure, thetes a total lack of it in DC.So the million dollar question.....what is "real intelligence" ?
We have "AI" right now that can create novel artwork.....
....now sure, the argument is "well they dont actually create anything, they just reference other work and rearrange it"
....but isn't that what a person does?.....I can't draw a car if I have no reference for what a car looks like.....so technically everything I create is a variant of something I've seen before.....
But let's assume we create a learning model that is so advanced, that it is practically indestinguisable from "true AI".......does it really make a difference that its only a learning model?
The expectation of the observer may affect the outcome of the experiment.Its not just about intelligence, AI can mimic intelligence via mass relational computation, but AI will never have consciousness.
Look up presentations from Roger Penrose, who seems to side with consciouness being outside of known physics. And how the human brain is computational but only to a point.
And how studies are revealing that consiousness may impact matter and measurement,..collasping wave functions etc.
The expectation of the observer may affect the outcome of the experiment.
Immanuel Kant wrote an exhaustive discussion of reason and logic, concluding that it can only take you so far. At some point you need to make a leap of some sort.
Zeno and Parmenides got into a lot of that kind of thought 2500 years back.Its not only the expectation but also in general, that the observer exists. It gets really bizarre and is so counter to our traditional "wiring" because we do not interact with these things in our macro-scale "physical reality".
I tend to think what's missing is that physical reality is "analog" and can be subdivided infinitely. This runs counter to what physicists believe and what we know with sub-sub atomic particles and the subsequent standard model. We rely on mathematics to explain the world as we can see it, or theorize how things behave. And while this is extremely helpful, its still an approximation of the actual behavior. Sure, 30 decimal places of accuracy can get you to the moon and beyond, but does it explain 1/3 in its totality?
But this is a long ways from the original OP.
To digress a bit further, the more I dig, the more sure I am that God exists.
In the arrow paradox, Zeno states that for motion to occur, an object must change the position which it occupies. He gives an example of an arrow in flight. He states that at any one (durationless) instant of time, the arrow is neither moving to where it is, nor to where it is not.[16] It cannot move to where it is not, because no time elapses for it to move there; it cannot move to where it is, because it is already there. In other words, at every instant of time there is no motion occurring. If everything is motionless at every instant, and time is entirely composed of instants, then motion is impossible.If everything when it occupies an equal space is at rest at that instant of time, and if that which is in locomotion is always occupying such a space at any moment, the flying arrow is therefore motionless at that instant of time and at the next instant of time but if both instants of time are taken as the same instant or continuous instant of time then it is in motion.[15]
— as recounted by Aristotle, Physics VI:9, 239b5
Interesting.Wouldn't it something if AI eventually concluded that:
Men are Men and Women are Women.
The complexity of the human body make evolution mathematically impossible even over millions of years.
The stars in the heavens are indeed countless.
The Bible is right.
Zeno and Parmenides got into a lot of that kind of thought 2500 years back.
One of Zeno's thoughts was that 'If you launch an arrow, at any given instant in time, it is suspended in space and not moving so it will never reach its goal. Not a good example by me. Interesting stuff though.
Arrow paradox[edit]
The arrow
Not to be confused with other paradoxes of the same name.
In the arrow paradox, Zeno states that for motion to occur, an object must change the position which it occupies. He gives an example of an arrow in flight. He states that at any one (durationless) instant of time, the arrow is neither moving to where it is, nor to where it is not.[16] It cannot move to where it is not, because no time elapses for it to move there; it cannot move to where it is, because it is already there. In other words, at every instant of time there is no motion occurring. If everything is motionless at every instant, and time is entirely composed of instants, then motion is impossible.
Whereas the first two paradoxes divide space, this paradox starts by dividing time—and not into segments, but into points.[17]
Other paradoxes
Been there, done that.When you said “singularity” I was hoping you meant the universe was going to undertake the “Big Crunch” and compress back down into a single point of infinite density/energy/heat. Now that would be cool
That’s interesting because I tend to agree with you! Funny thing is, I have a number of friends that said, the more they studied religion the more they didn’t believe and made a point that many that went into the faith ultimately came out doubting their beliefs, you know quite the opposite of what was supposed to happen. Now this is all their claims and they can back it up but for everyone of these I can back up with the opposite claim as there are plenty of scientists and physicists who’s faith only grew stronger.Its not only the expectation but also in general, that the observer exists. It gets really bizarre and is so counter to our traditional "wiring" because we do not interact with these things in our macro-scale "physical reality".
I tend to think what's missing is that physical reality is "analog" and can be subdivided infinitely. This runs counter to what physicists believe and what we know with sub-sub atomic particles and the subsequent standard model. We rely on mathematics to explain the world as we can see it, or theorize how things behave. And while this is extremely helpful, its still an approximation of the actual behavior. Sure, 30 decimal places of accuracy can get you to the moon and beyond, but does it explain 1/3 in its totality?
But this is a long ways from the original OP.
To digress a bit further, the more I dig, the more sure I am that God exists.
This is what I initially thought based on the title alone! Ha.When you said “singularity” I was hoping you meant the universe was going to undertake the “Big Crunch” and compress back down into a single point of infinite density/energy/heat. Now that would be cool
Yes....everything that we know and understand is an agreement for us to exist. Math is just another form of agreement.Fun stuff, and yet if you simply use d=vt it "solves" that paradox, right? Many mathematicians believe maths was "always there" and we discovered it - as if it were some divine gift (the egos of these fellas). I disagree. I believe man created maths in an attempt to provide description.
The 'singularity' is coming.
A Scientist Says the Singularity Will Happen by 2031
View attachment 8268290
Popular Mechanics
https://www.popularmechanics.com › technology › when...
If your color blind how do you know they are red heads?Yes....everything that we know and understand is an agreement for us to exist. Math is just another form of agreement.
I have colorblindness issues, but I really think my entire world looks different than everyone else. We just agree a shape has meaning and words have
meaning. My square, might be your circle. Color blindness, in my mind is just a confirmation that my world looks different than yours. Colors too close is just a product of my world view not being the same as yours.
Another example, some find red heads hot as fuck, Im utterly disgusted by their appearance. Ive never seen a hot redhead!!!!!!
If you consider the light spectrum we can actually see.....think about the massive amount of things occuring around you right now.
Ive never tried mushrooms, but I think it bends your mind to something we arent supposed to see....or maybe we are.
The next major break through for man will not be AI, but the creation of something to shift your mind into the next higher gear!
What if you could heal chronic pain, just by tweaking some nerves ever so slightly!
The singularity is also when a star turns into a black hole and even light cant excape its gravity.How can you take these bozos seriously when they don't correctly define the singularity?
The singularity: The singularity is also the point at which machines' intelligence and humans would merge;
I dodnt know about the formula, but I agree with the rest. 'D= distance,'. Id reckon V = velocity and T = time? I appreciate math and its potential, but being somewhat numerically dyslexic, its been difficult for me. I'd guess even Zeno didnt take it really serious, but like Socrates, he enjoyed fucking with lesser minds. Regardless, thinking outside the box is a win.Fun stuff, and yet if you simply use d=vt it "solves" that paradox, right? Many mathematicians believe maths was "always there" and we discovered it - as if it were some divine gift (the egos of these fellas). I disagree. I believe man created maths in an attempt to provide description.
AI means Accuracy Internecinal, right? Wheres the problem?Yesterday I could not spell AI
Today I are one
That's a singularity not The Singularity. The definition I posted is from Ray Kurzweil who coined the term in his book "The singularity is near"The singularity is also when a star turns into a black hole and even light cant excape its gravity.
Kurzweil was a bright guy. I remember his keyboards were the hot shit in their day.That's a singularity not The Singularity. The definition I posted is from Ray Kurzweil who coined the term in his book "The singularity is near"
Indeed. And around the time of the book he had a website Kurzweilai.net where he and others published inciteful articles and papers and hosted discussions open to all.Kurzweil was a bright guy. I remember his keyboards were the hot shit in their day.
Not saying you might be gay... But..Another example, some find red heads hot as fuck, Im utterly disgusted by their appearance. Ive never seen a hot redhead!!!!!!
Not saying you might be gay... But..